Skip to main content

The Quantum Logic Formalism

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Formalisms of Quantum Mechanics

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Physics ((LNP,volume 893))

  • 4432 Accesses

Abstract

The quantum logic formalism is another interesting, albeit more abstract, way to formulate quantum physics. The bonus of this approach is that one does not need to start from the assumption that the set of observables of a physical system is embodied with the algebraic structure of an associative unital algebra. As discussed in the previous section, this assumption that one can “add” and “multiply” observables is already a highly non trivial one. This algebraic structure is natural in classical physics since the observables form a commutative Poisson algebra, addition and multiplication of observables reflect the action of adding and multiplying results of different measurements (it is the Poisson bracket structure that is non trivial).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 34.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    An eminent mathematician, not to be confused with his father, the famous G.D. Birkhoff of the ergodic theorem.

  2. 2.

    In a very loose sense, I am not discussing mathematical logic theory.

  3. 3.

    with the usual reservation on the lecturer’s qualifications.

  4. 4.

    The point discussed here is a priori not connected to the classical versus intuitionist logics debate. Remember that we are not discussing a logical system.

  5. 5.

    One should be careful for infinite dimensional Hilbert spaces and general operator algebras. Projectors correspond in general to orthogonal projections on closed subspaces.

  6. 6.

    In French: treillis orthomodulaire, in German: Orthomodulare Verband.

  7. 7.

    A module is the analog of a vector space, but on a ring instead of a (commutative) field.

  8. 8.

    A division ring is the analog of a field, but without commutativity.

Bibliography

  1. E. Artin, Geometric Algebra, vol. 3 (Interscience Publishers, New York, 1957)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. R. Baer, Linear Algebra and Projective Geometry (Dover, Mineola, 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  3. E.G. Beltrametti, G. Cassinelli, The Logic of Quantum Mechanics. Encyclopedia of Mathematics and Its Applications, vol. 15 (Addison-Wesley, Reading, 1981)

    Google Scholar 

  4. G. Birkhoff, J. von Neumann, The logic of quantum mechanics. Ann. Math. 37, 823–843 (1936)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. G. Gasinelli, P. Lahti, A theorem of Solér, the theory of symmetry and quantum mechanics. Int. J. Geom. Methods Mod. Phys. 9(2), 1260005 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  6. A.M. Gleason, Measures on the closed subspaces of a Hilbert space. Indiana Univ. Math. J. 6, 885–893 (1957)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. S.S. Holland, Orthomodularity in infinite dimensions; a theorem of M. Solèr. Bull. Am. Math. Soc. (N.S.) 32, 205–234 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  8. J.M. Jauch, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics (Addison-Wesley, Reading, 1968)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. G.W. Mackey, Mathematical Foundation of Quantum Mechanics (Benjamin, New York, 1963)

    Google Scholar 

  10. F. Maeda, S. Maeda, Theory of Symmetric Lattices. Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften (Springer, Berlin, 1971)

    Google Scholar 

  11. C. Piron, “Axiomatique” quantique. Helv. Phys. Acta 37, 439–468 (1964)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. C. Piron, Foundations of Quantum Physics (Benjamin, New York, 1976)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. M.P. Solèr, Characterization of Hilbert spaces with orthomodular spaces. Commun. Algebra 23, 219–243 (1995)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. V.S. Varadarajan, The Geometry of Quantum Mechanics (Springer, New York, 1985)

    Google Scholar 

  15. J. von Neumann, Mathematische Grundlagen der Quantenmechanik. Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften, volume Bd. 38. (Springer, Berlin, 1932)

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. von Neumann, Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. Investigations in Physics, vol. 2. (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1955)

    Google Scholar 

  17. J. von Neumann, Continuous Geometry. Princeton Mathematical Series, vol. 25. (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1960)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

David, F. (2015). The Quantum Logic Formalism. In: The Formalisms of Quantum Mechanics. Lecture Notes in Physics, vol 893. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10539-0_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics