Skip to main content

User Attitudes Towards Facebook: Perception and Reassurance of Trust (Estonian Case Study)

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 1226))

Abstract

Privacy and security breaches have gained more attention and people’s trust in different platforms has been affected negatively. In light of the rise of data and security breaches, trust has become important to both experts and users. We are generating more data than ever before but how this data is being used or handled is unclear. The goal of this research is to understand Estonian Facebook users’ usage behavior and perception of trust in Facebook. Knowing how users perceive trust and its effect on their usage behavior, designers can create platforms that are trustworthy and thereby, user friendly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Weisbaum, H.: Trust in Facebook has dropped by 66 percent since the Cambridge Analytica scandal, April 2018. https://nbcnews.to/2vJnYZX. Accessed 17 Mar 2020

  2. Christofides, E., Muise, A., Desmarais, S.: Information disclosure and control on Facebook: are they two sides of the same coin or two different processes? Cyberpsychol. Behav. 12(3), 341–345 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dhami, A., Agarwal, N., Chakraborty, T.K., Singh, B.P., Minj, J.: Impact of trust, security and privacy concerns in social networking: an exploratory study to understand the pattern of information revelation in Facebook. In: 2013 IEEE 3rd International Advance Computing Conference (IACC), pp. 465–469. IEEE, February 2013

    Google Scholar 

  4. Christofides, E., Muise, A., Desmarais, S.: Hey mom, what’s on your Facebook? Comparing Facebook disclosure and privacy in adolescents and adults. Soc. Psychol. Personal. Sci. 3(1), 48–54 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Universal McCann: Wave 9. The Meaning of Moments. Glen Parker, New York (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lomas, N.: How Facebook has reacted since the data misuse scandal broke, April 2018. https://tcrn.ch/327pql5. Accessed 17 Mar 2020

  7. Ivanova, I.: 8 promises from Facebook after Cambridge Analytica, April 2018. https://cbsn.ws/32hl1w0. Accessed 17 Mar 2020

  8. Kokoszka, P.: #DeleteFacebook: Facebook alternatives to get your social media fix, July 2018. http://bit.ly/38M1JRC. Accessed 17 Mar 2020

  9. Buchanan, T., Paine, C., Joinson, A.N., Reips, U.D.: Development of measures of online privacy concern and protection for use on the Internet. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 58(2), 157–165 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Data Never Sleeps 6.0 (2018). http://bit.ly/3d46QiF. Accessed 17 Mar 2020

  11. Data Breaches (2019). https://www.privacyrights.org/data-breaches. Accessed 17 Mar 2020

  12. Gemalto: Data privacy and new regulations take center stage (2019). https://breachlevelindex.com/request-report. Accessed 17 Mar 2020

  13. Whittaker, Z.: 171 million VK.com accounts stolen by hackers, June 2016. https://zd.net/2IPZPnM. Accessed 17 Mar 2020

  14. MacMillan, D., McMillan, R.: Google exposed user data, feared repercussions of disclosing to public, October 2018. https://on.wsj.com/2SHCdYg. Accessed 17 Mar 2020

  15. Price, R.: Hackers stole millions of Facebook users’ highly sensitive data—and the FBI has asked it not to say who might be behind it, October 2018. http://bit.ly/2WwK4KL. Accessed 17 Mar 2020

  16. Price, R.: Facebook endured a staggering number of scandals and controversies in 2018 - here they all are, December 2018. http://bit.ly/38U8bW1. Accessed 17 Mar 2020

  17. Wathieu, L., Friedman, A.A.: An empirical approach to understanding privacy valuation. In: HBS Marketing Research Paper, (07-075) (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Livingstone, S.: Children’s privacy online: experimenting with boundaries within and beyond the family (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Cavoukian, A.: Privacy by design in law, policy and practice. A white paper for regulators, decision-makers and policy-makers (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hansen, M.: Marrying transparency tools with user-controlled identity management. In: Fischer-Hübner, S., Duquenoy, P., Zuccato, A., Martucci, L. (eds.) Privacy and Identity 2007. ITIFIP, vol. 262, pp. 199–220. Springer, Boston, MA (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-79026-8_14

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Borking, J.J., Raab, C.D.: Laws, PETs and other technologies for privacy protection. J. Inf. Law Technol. 1, 1–14 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hoadley, C.M., Xu, H., Lee, J.J., Rosson, M.B.: Privacy as information access and illusory control: the case of the Facebook News Feed privacy outcry. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. 9(1), 50–60 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wang, N., Xu, H., Grossklags, J.: Third-party apps on Facebook: privacy and the illusion of control. In: Proceedings of the 5th ACM Symposium on Computer Human Interaction for Management of Information Technology, p. 4. ACM, December 2011

    Google Scholar 

  24. Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., Straub, D.W.: Trust and TAM in online shopping: an integrated model. MIS Q. 27(1), 51–90 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kim, D., Benbasat, I.: Trust-related arguments in internet stores: a framework for evaluation. J. Electron. Commer. Res. 4(2), 49–64 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Lauer, T.W., Deng, X.: Building online trust through privacy practices. Int. J. Inf. Secur. 6(5), 323–331 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Schoorman, F.D., Mayer, R.C., Davis, J.H.: An integrative model of organizational trust: past, present, and future (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Flechais, I., Riegelsberger, J., Sasse, M.A.: Divide and conquer: the role of trust and assurance in the design of secure socio-technical systems. In: Proceedings of the 2005 Workshop on New Security Paradigms, pp. 33–41. ACM, September 2005

    Google Scholar 

  29. Sherchan, W., Nepal, S., Paris, C.: A survey of trust in social networks. ACM Comput. Surv. (CSUR) 45(4), 1–33 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Strufe, T.: Safebook: a privacy-preserving online social network leveraging on real-life trust. IEEE Commun. Mag. 47, 95–101 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Triin Oper .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Oper, T., Sousa, S. (2020). User Attitudes Towards Facebook: Perception and Reassurance of Trust (Estonian Case Study). In: Stephanidis, C., Antona, M. (eds) HCI International 2020 - Posters. HCII 2020. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1226. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50732-9_30

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50732-9_30

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-50731-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-50732-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics