Skip to main content

The Affective Life of Neoliberalism: Constructing (Un)reasonableness on Mumsnet

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

In this paper we make an argument for taking seriously the affective life of neoliberalism, building from a number of circulating concepts, including the idea of affective atmospheres (Gregg 2018), public moods (Silva 2013; Forkert 2018), and neoliberal feeling rules (Kanai 2019). Earlier work pointed to the need to take seriously the way in which neoliberalism shapes subjectivity through a plethora of forms of intimate governance (e.g. Brown 2015; Scharff 2016; Barker 2018). Here we argue that such governance also operates at the level of emotions and feelings, shaping what is deemed appropriate and even intelligible. In order to explore this concretely, we choose as an empirical example a well-known topic/motif on the hugely popular British parenting website, Mumsnet, in which women post with the question: Am I Being Unreasonable? (AIBU) We explore how AIBU is mobilised specifically in relation to felt inequalities in heterosexual relationships, particularly those involving parenting, arguing that it is a key site for the expression and governance of feelings, and crucial for exploring the entanglement of the personal and the political. We show that while the site is involved in ‘affect policing’ and in setting norms, it is also a place of solidarity that may at times redraw the boundaries around what it is ‘appropriate’ to feel.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adkins, L., & Dever, M. (Eds.). (2015). The Post-Fordist Sexual Contract: Living and Working in Contingency. London: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed, S. (2004). Collective Feelings. Theory, Culture & Society, 21(2), 25–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asher, R. (2011). Shattered: Modern Motherhood and the Illusion of Equality. London: Harvill Secker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banet-Weiser, S. (2015). “Confidence You Can Carry!”: Girls in Crisis and the Market for Girls’ Empowerment Organisations. Continuum, 29(2), 182–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barker, M. J., Gill, R., & Harvey, L. (2018). Mediated Intimacy: Sex Advice in Media Culture. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlant, L. (2011). Cruel Optimism. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Blackman, L., Gunaratnam, Y., & Turner (2018, June 18). Public Feeling, Dissident Acts: Dismantling Cultures of Sexual Harassment in Universities. Conference, Goldsmiths, London. https://sites.gold.ac.uk/cfrblog/2018/06/04/public-feeling-dissident-acts-dismantling-cultures-of-sexual-harassment-in-universities/.

  • Briggs, L. (2018). How All Politics Became Reproductive Politics. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, W. (2015). Undoing the Demos: Neoliberalism’s Stealth Revolution. New York: Zone Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bull, A., & Allen, K. (2018). Introduction: Sociological Interrogations of the Turn to Character. Sociological Research Online, 23(2), 392–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cederstrom, C., & Spicer, A. (2015). The Wellness Syndrome. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, J. (2008). Living With/in and Without Neo-Liberalism. Focaal, 2008(51), 135–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Couldry, N., & Littler, J. (2011). Work, Power and Performance: Analysing the ‘Reality’ Game of The Apprentice. Cultural Sociology, 5(2), 263–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crouch, C. (2011). The Strange Non-Death of Neo-Liberalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruikshank, B. (1993). Revolutions Within: Self-Government and Self-Esteem. Economy and Society, 22(3), 327–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, W. (2015). The Happiness Industry: How the Government and Big Business Sold Us Well-Being. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, W., & Gane, N. (forthcoming). Post-Neoliberalism? [Special issue]. Theory, Culture & Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, S. J., & Michaels, M. W. (2004). The Mommy Myth: The Idealisation of Motherhood and How It Has Undermined All Women. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emma. (2017). You Should’ve Asked. Available at https://english.emmaclit.com/2017/05/20/you-shouldve-asked/.

  • Favaro, L. (2017). ‘Just Be Confident Girls!’: Confidence Chic as Neoliberal Governmentality. In A. Elias, R. Gill, & C. Scharff (Eds.), Aesthetic Labour: Rethinking Beauty Politics in Neoliberalism (pp. 283–299). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Forkert, K. (2018). Austerity as Public Mood: Social Anxieties and Social Struggles. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, D. (2016). Lean Out. London: Repeater Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, N. (2016, July–August). Contradictions of Capital and Care. New Left Review, 100, 99–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedli, L., & Stearn, R. (2015). Positive Affect as Coercive Strategy: Conditionality, Activation and the Role of Psychology in UK Government Workfare Programmes. Medical Humanities, 40–41, 40–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, J. (2013). What Kind of Thing Is Neoliberalism? New Formations, 80(81), 7–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giles, D. (2016). Observing Real-World Groups in the Virtual Field: the Analysis of Online Discussion. British Journal of Social Psychology, 55, 484–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gill, R., & Orgad, S. (2015). The Confidence Culture. Australian Feminist Studies, 30(86), 324–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giroux, H. A. (2008). Beyond Biopolitics of Disposability: Rethinking Neoliberalism in the New Gilded Age. Social Identities, 14(5), 587–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregg, M. (2018). Counterproductive: Time Management in the Knowledge Economy. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, S., Massey, D., & Rustin, M. (Eds.). (2013). After Neoliberalism: The Kilburn Manifesto. London: Lawrence & Wishart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochschild, A. with Manchung, A. (2012 [1989]) The Second Shift: Working Families and the Revolution at Home (2nd ed.). London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Illouz, E. (2007). Cold Intimacies: The Making of Emotional Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, T. (2018). Parenting the Crisis. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kanai, A. (2019). Gender and Relatability in Digital Culture: Managing Affect, Intimacy and Value. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Littler, J. (2013). The Rise of the ‘Yummy Mummy’: Popular Conservatism and the Neoliberal Maternal in Contemporary British Culture. Communication, Culture and Critique, 6(2), 227–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Littler, J. (2018). Against Meritocracy: Culture, Power and Myths of Mobility. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Littler, J., & Winch, A. (2016). Feminism and Childcare Revisited: a Roundtable with Sara De Benedictis, Gideon Burrows, Tracey Jensen, Jill Rutter and Victoria Showunmi. Studies in the Maternal, 8(1). http://www.mamsie.bbk.ac.uk/articles/10.16995/sim.212/.

  • Mackenzie, J. (2017). ‘Can We Have a Child Exchange?’ Constructing and Subverting the ‘Good Mother’ Through Play in Mumsnet Talk. Discourse & Society, 28(3), 296–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madge, H., & O’Connor, C. (2004). ‘My Mum’s Thirty Years Out of Date’: the Role of the Internet in the Transition to Motherhood. Community, Work & Family, 7(3), 351–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNay, L. (2009). Self as Enterprise: Dilemmas of Control and Resistance in Foucault’s the Birth of Biopolitics. Theory, Culture & Society, 26(6), 55–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McRobbie, A. (2015). Notes on the Perfect: Competitive Femininity in Neoliberal Times. Australian Feminist Studies, 30(83), 3–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mirowski, P. (2014). Never Let a Serious Crisis Go To Waste: How Neoliberalism Survived the Financial Meltdown. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moravec, M. (Ed.). (2011). Motherhood Online. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mumsnet. (2009). Mumsnet Census. https://www.mumsnet.com/info/media/census-2009.

  • Negra, D., & Tasker, Y. (Eds.). (2014). Gendering the Recession: Media and Culture in an Age of Austerity. Durham: Duke.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, J. (1991). Enterprising Women: Images of Success. In Sarah Franklin, Celia Lury, & Jackie Stacey (Eds.), Off-Centre: Feminism and Cultural Studies (pp. 241–259). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ong, A. (2006). Neoliberalism as Exception: Mutations in Citizenship and Sovereignty. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Orgad, S. (2019). Heading Home: Motherhood, Work and the Failed Promise of Equality. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ouellette, L. (2016). Lifestyle TV. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ouellette, L., & Hay, J. (2008). Makeover Television, Governmentality and the Good Citizen. Continuum, 22(4), 471–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peck, J., & Tickell, A. T. (2002). Neoliberalizing Space. Antipode, 34(3), 380–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, S. (2016). The Good, the Bad and the ‘Good Enough’ Mother on the UK Parenting Forum Mumsnet. Women’s Studies International Forum, 59, 32–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, S., & Burnett, S. (2018). “Citizen Curation” in Online Discussions of Donald Trump’s Presidency: Sharing the News on Mumsnet. Digital Journalism, 6(5), 545–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, S., & Lupton, D. (2018). ‘What Are You Feeling Right Now?’ Communities of Maternal Feeling on Mumsnet. Emotion, Space and Society, 26, 57–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, S., & Smithson, J. (2013). Mothers with Attitude: How the Mumsnet Parenting Forum Offers Space for New Forms of Femininity to Emerge Online. Women’s Studies International Forum, 38, 97–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N. (2006). Governing ‘Advanced’ Liberal Democracies. In Aradhana Sharma & Akhil Gupta (Eds.), The Anthropology of the State: A Reader (pp. 144–162). Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rottenberg, C. (2018). The Rise of Neoliberal Feminism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rowbotham, S., Segal, L., & Wainwright, H. (1979). Beyond the Fragments. London: Merlin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandberg, S. (2013). Lean In: Women, Work, and the Will to Lead. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharff, C. (2016). The Psychic Life of Neoliberalism: Mapping the Contours of Entrepreneurial Subjectivity. Theory, Culture & Society, 33(6), 107–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Segal, L. (2018). Democracy in the Making. Soundings, 69, 113–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seyfert, R. (2012). Beyond Personal Feelings and Collective Emotions: Toward a Theory of Social Affect. Theory, Culture & Society, 29(6), 27–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silva, J. M. (2013). Coming Up Short: Working-Class Adulthood in an Age of Uncertainty. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swan, E. (2008). ‘You Make Me Feel Like a Women’: Therapeutic Cultures and the Contagion of Femininity. Gender, Work & Organization, 15(1), 88–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, R., Kehily, M. J., Hadfield, L., & Sharpe, S. (2011). Making Modern Mothers. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tincknell, E. (1991). Enterprise Fictions. In Sarah Franklin, Celia Lury, & Jackie Stacey (Eds.), Off-Centre: Feminism and Cultural Studies (pp. 260–273). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trump, I. (2017). Women Who Work: Rewriting the Rules for Success. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, I. (2013). Revolting Subjects: Social Abjection and Resistance in Neoliberal Britain. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R. (2001 [1961]). The Long Revolution. Peterborough, ON: Broadview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. (2018). Neoliberalism. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. A., & Yochim, E. C. (2017). Mothering Through Precarity: Women’s Work and Digital Media. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yvonne Ehrstein .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ehrstein, Y., Gill, R., Littler, J. (2020). The Affective Life of Neoliberalism: Constructing (Un)reasonableness on Mumsnet. In: Dawes, S., Lenormand, M. (eds) Neoliberalism in Context . Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26017-0_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26017-0_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-26016-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-26017-0

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics