Skip to main content

Monitoring as a Tool to Ensure the Quality of Services Provided in the Interaction of Service Organizations and Municipal Authorities in Economy Digitalization

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 908))

Abstract

Monitoring is a tool that ensures the quality of services provided in the interaction of service organizations and municipal authorities in economy digitalization. In this regard, this contribution is aimed at identifying monitoring tools as an integral part of the management cycle. These tools make it possible to adjust the management of an object or process through the use of digital services. The results of this process determine the functional importance in providing “feedback”: the possibility of identifying the needs of the controlled object, monitoring the efficiency of the chosen methods and instruments of influence on it by the subject. To achieve the goal, the authors relied on theoretical and empirical methods of scientific research. At the same time, objective monitoring results characterizing the quality of services provided in the interaction of service organizations and municipal authorities should be determined by applying an interaction model of all participants in this process based on the method of ensuring the quality of services provided. This methodology is a leading approach to this problem, which allows a comprehensive review when monitoring the quality of services provided upon five general criteria, as well as additional indicators formed by the results of this monitoring. The contribution revealed that these monitoring criteria allow determining the efficiency of subordinate organizations, which is justified by conducting independent service quality monitoring provided in the region by the municipal committee and organizations subordinate to it according to common criteria such as: openness and availability of information about the organization, comfortable conditions for services, customer waiting time, friendliness, politeness, care when providing services, satisfaction with the quality of services. The materials of the contribution are of practical value for service organizations when interacting with municipal authorities, since they determine the results of independent monitoring conducted through digital services. Thus, the advantages and disadvantages of monitoring within the framework of this interaction model were identified. On the one hand, the interaction between them is in opposite directions to each other, which illustrates a well-structured and well-coordinated process of information transfer, where everyone understands his role and knows his functions. On the other hand, it is necessary to note, as a model deficiency, that information acquired when conducting independent monitoring, is not brought to the notice of subordinate organizations, the population, for whom this independent service quality monitoring was conducted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. About modification of separate legal acts of the Russian Federation concerning conducting independent service quality monitoring provided by the organizations in the field of culture, social service, health protection and education: the Federal law of July 21, 2014 No. 256-FZ. http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_165899. Accessed 11 Mai 2018

  2. About the approval of the plan of actions for forming of independent monitoring system of the quality of social services provided by organizations for 2013–2015: the order of the Government of the Russian Federation of 30.03.2013 N 487-p, item 9. http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_144318. Accessed 11 Mai 2018

  3. Basarangil I (2018) The relationships between the factors affecting perceived service quality, satisfaction and behavioral intentions among theme park visitors. Tour Hosp Res 18(4):415–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Candiello A, Albarelli A, Cortesi A (2012) Quality and impact monitoring for local e-government services. Transform Gov People Process Policy 6(1):112–125. https://doi.org/10.1108/17506161211214859

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Colakovic A, Bajric H (2016) Assessing customer satisfaction based on QoS parameters. Int J Qual Res 11(1):221–240. http://www.ijqr.net/journal/v11-n1/14.pdf. Accessed 11 Mai 2018

  6. Goryaeva SE (2012) Methodological and methodical bases of the study of public opinion on the quality of public services. Bull Inst Complex Stud Arid Territ 1(24):50–57

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mele C, Colurcio M, Russo-Spena T (2014) Research traditions of innovation: goods-dominant logic, the resource-based approach, and service-dominant logic. Manag Serv Qual 24(6):612–642. https://doi.org/10.1108/MSQ-10-2013-0223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pavlova VV (2011) Typology of changes in the organization and their characteristics. Actual Probl Econ Law 2:102–106

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pop AB, Ţîţu AM (2018) Implementation of an integrated management system: quality-information security in an industrial knowledge-based organization. Qual Access Success 19(166):87–93

    Google Scholar 

  10. Simakhin OG (2011) Development of the system of management of state customs services on the basis of customs monitoring: thesis of candidate of economic sciences, Moscow, p 153

    Google Scholar 

  11. Vesloguzova MV, Zemskova OA (2017) Methods of assessing customer satisfaction with the quality and comfort provided by the municipal services. In: Problems and prospects of development of social and economic potential of the Russian regions materials VI all-Russian electronic scientific-practical conference, pp 195–200

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wickramasinghe V (2015) Effects of human resource development practices on service quality of services offshore outsourcing firms. Int J Qual Reliab Manag 32(7):703–717. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-03-2013-0047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wulan IR (2017) The role of regulations on administrative and practices in improving quality of services in public organizations. Cogent Bus Manag 4:1–16. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/23311975.2017.1396952?needAccess=true. Accessed 11 Mai 2018

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. V. Vesloguzova .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Vesloguzova, M.V., Petrik, L.S., Salikhov, K.M., Bunakov, O.A. (2020). Monitoring as a Tool to Ensure the Quality of Services Provided in the Interaction of Service Organizations and Municipal Authorities in Economy Digitalization. In: Ashmarina, S., Mesquita, A., Vochozka, M. (eds) Digital Transformation of the Economy: Challenges, Trends and New Opportunities. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 908. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11367-4_33

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics