Abstract
Prevalence rates for Personality Disorders are higher in psychiatric settings. Nonetheless, the presence of a personality disorder may go undetected for some time during the early phases of treatment. This is problematic as a failure to detect a Personality Disorder as part of the initial evaluation can result in less beneficial treatment plans, negative outcomes, and a more difficult treatment course. Nonetheless, the benefits of early detection must be weighed against practical considerations, including time and resources. Currently gold-standard assessment measures for Personality Disorders are lengthy and time consuming which may limit their practical utility. The present chapter reviews data on the importance of assessing for personality disorders, reviews the benefits of stage I (screening for Personality Disorders) and stage II (thorough evaluation for a Personality Disorder), and then reviews four recently developed measures that can be used as part of the personality disorder screening process. Information on more detailed measures for stage II assessment is also briefly presented and clinical implications are discussed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Lewin TJ, Slade T, Andrews G, Carr VJ, Hornabrook CW. Assessing personality disorders in a national mental health survey. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 2005; 40: 87–98.
Zimmerman M, Rothschild L, Chelminski I. The Prevalence of DSM-IV Personality Disorders in Psychiatric Outpatients. American Journal of Psychiatry 2005; 162: 1911–1918.
Newton-Howes G, Tyrer P, Johnson T. Personality Disorders and the outcome of depression: meta-analysis of published studies. British Journal of Psychiatry 2006; 188: 13–20
Reich JH. The effects of Axis II disorders on the outcome of treatment of anxiety and unipolar depressive disorders: A review. Journal of Personality Disorders 2003; 15: 387–405.
Reich JH, Vasile RG. Effects of personality disorders on the treatment outcome of Axis I conditions: An update. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 1993; 181: 475–484.
First MB, Gibbon M, Spitzer RI, Williams JB, Benjamin LS. Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV Axis II Personality Disorders. Washington, DC: American Press, 1997.
Langbehn DR, Pfohl BM, Reynolds S, Clark LW, Battaglia M, Bellodi L, Cadoret, R, Grove W, Pilkonis P, Links P. The Iowa personality disorder screen: Development and preliminary evaluation of a brief screening interview. Journal of Personality Disorders 1999; 13: 75–89.
Morse JQ, Pilkonis PA. Screening for personality disorders. Journal of Personality Disorders 2007; 21: 179–198.
Kim Y, Pilkonis PA, Barkham M. Confirmatory factor analysis of the personality disorder subscales from the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems. Journal of Personality Assessment 1997; 69: 284–296.
Trull TJ, Amdur M. Diagnostic efficiency of the Iowa personality disorder screen items in a nonclinical sample. Journal of Personality Disorders 2001; 15: 351–357.
Dohrenwend B. “The problem of validity in field studies of psychological disorders” revisited. Psychological Medicine 1990; 20: 195–208.
Moran P, Leese M, Lee T, Walters P, Thornicroft G, Mann A. Standardised Assessment of Personality Scale (SAPAS): Preliminary validation of a brief screen for personality disorder. British Journal of Psychiatry 2003; 183: 228–232.
Kim Y, Pilkonis PA. Selecting the most informative items in the IIP scales for personality disorders: An application of item response theory. Journal of Personality Disorders 1999; 13: 157–174.
Mullins-Sweatt SN, Jamerson JE, Samuel DB, Olson DR, Widiger TA. Psychometric properties of an abbreviated instrument of the five-factor model. Assessment 2006; 13: 119–137.
Massion AO, Dyck I, Shea MT, Phillips KA, Warshaw MG, Keller MB. Personality disorders and time to remission in generalized anxiety disorder, social phobia, and panic disorder. Archives of General Psychiatry 2002; 59: 434–440.
Skodal AE, Gunderson JG, Shea MT, et al. The Collaborative Longitudinal Personality Disorders study (CLPS): Overview and implications. Journal of Personality Disorders 2005; 19: 487–504.
Clarkin JF, Yeomans FE, Kernberg OF. Psychotherapy for borderline personality: Focusing on object relations. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing Inc, 2006.
Linehan, M. Skills training manual for treating borderline personality disorder. New York: Guilford Press, 1993.
Bell SA. Personality traits, problems, and disorders: Clinical application to substance use disorders. Journal of Research in Personality 2005; 39: 84–102.
Harris EC, Barraclough B. Suicide as an outcome for mental disorders. A meta-analysis. British Journal of Psychiatry 1997; 170: 205–228.
Oldham JM, Skodal AE, Kellman HD et al. Comorbidity of Axis I and Axis II disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry 1995; 152: 571–578.
Egan S, Nathan P, Lumley M. Diagnostic concordance of ICD-10 personality and comorbid disorders: A comparison of standard clinical assessment and structured interviews in a clinical setting. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 2003; 37: 484–491.
Zimmerman M. Diagnosing personality disorders: A review of issues and research methods. Archives of General Psychiatry 1994; 51: 225–245.
Mann AH, Jenkins R, Cutting JC, et al. The development and use of a standardized assessment of abnormal personality. Psychological Medicine 1981; 11: 839–847.
Moran P, Rendu A, Jenkins R, et al. The impact of personality disorder in UK primary care: a 1-year follow-up of attenders. Psychological Medicine 2001; 31: 1447–1454.
Pfohl B, Blum N, Zimmerman M. Structured interview for DSM-IV personality SIDP-IV. Iowa City, IA. The University of Iowa, 1995.
Meyer B, Pilkonis PA. An attachment model of personality disorders. New York: Guilford Press, 2005.
Horowitz LM, Rosenberg SE, Baer BA, Ureño G, Villaseñor VS. Inventory of Interpersonal Problems: Psychometric properties and clinical applications. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1988; 56: 885–892.
Pilkonis PA, Kim Y, Proietta JM, Barkham M. Scales for personality disorders developed from the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems. Journal of Personality Disorders 1996; 10: 355–369.
Embretson S. The new rules of measurement. Psychological Assessment 1996; 8: 341–349.
Lynman DR, Widiger TA. Using the Five-Factor Model to represent the DSM-IV personality disorder: An expert consensus approach. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 2001; 110: 401–42
Costa PT, McCrae RR. Domains and facets: Hierarchical personality assessment using the revised NEO personality inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment 1995; 64: 21–50.
Miller JD, Reynolds SK, Pilkonis PA. The validity of the Five-Factor Model prototypes for personality disorders in two clinical samples. Psychological Assessment 2004; 16: 310–322.
Costa PT, Widiger TA. Personality disorders and the five-factor model of personality. (2nd edition). Washington DC US: American Psychological Association, 2002.
Saulsman LM, Page AC. The five-factor model and personality disorder empirical literature: A meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology Review 2004; 23: 1055–1085.
Widiger TA, Costa PT, McCrae RR. A proposal for Axis II: Diagnosing personality disorders using the five-factor model. In TA Widiger & PT Costa (Eds.) Personality disorders and the five-factor model of personality (2nd ed., pp. 431–456). New York: Oxford University Press, 2002.
McCrae RR, Lockenhoff CE, Costa, PT. A step Toward DSM-V: Cataloguing personality-related problems in living. European Journal of Personality 2005; 19: 269–286.
Widiger TA, Costa PT, McCrae RR. A proposal for Axis II: Diagnosing personality disorders using the Five-Factor Model. In PT Cost & TA Widiger (Eds.), Personality Disorders and the five-factor model of personality (2nd edition); Washington, DC: American Psychological Association 2002; 431–456.
Samuel DB, Widiger TA. Clinicians’ personality descriptions of prototypic personality disorders. Journal of Personality Disorders 2004; 16: 55–62.
Widiger TA, Mangine S, Corbittt EM, Ellis CG, Thomas GV. Personality disorder interview-IV: A semistructured interview for the assessment of personality disorders. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, 1995.
Loranger AW, Sartorius N, Andreoli A, et al. The international Personality Disorder Examination: The WHO/ADAMHA International pilot study of personality disorders. Archives of General Psychiatry 1994; 51: 215–224.
Trull TJ, Widiger TA. Structured Interview for the five-factor model of personality (SIFFM): Professionals manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, 1997.
Hyler, SE. Personality questionnaire, PDQ-4 +. New York, NY: New York State Psychiatric Institute, 1994.
Millon T, Millon C, Davis R. Millon clinical inventory-III manual, Minneapolis MN: National Computer Systems, 1994.
Loranger AW. The OMNI personality inventories professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, 2001.
Rivas-Vazquez, R, Blais, M. Pharmacological treatment of personality disorders, Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 2002, 33, 104–107.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Humana Press, a part of Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Siefert, C.J. (2009). Screening for Personality Disorders in Psychiatric Settings: Four Recently Developed Screening Measures. In: Baer, L., Blais, M.A. (eds) Handbook of Clinical Rating Scales and Assessment in Psychiatry and Mental Health. Current Clinical Psychiatry. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-387-5_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-387-5_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ
Print ISBN: 978-1-58829-966-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-59745-387-5
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)