Abstract
Analysis of protein–protein interactions is important for better understanding of molecular mechanisms involved in immune regulation and has potential for elaborating avenues for drug discovery targeting T-cell motility. Currently, only a small fraction of protein–protein interactions have been characterized in T-lymphocytes although there are several detection methods available. In this regard, computational approaches garner importance, with the continued explosion of genomic and proteomic data, for handling protein modeling and protein–protein interactions in large scale. Here, we describe a computational method to identify protein–protein interactions based on in silico protein design.
Key words
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Verma NK, Kelleher D (2017) Not just an adhesion molecule: LFA-1 contact tunes the T lymphocyte program. J Immunol 199:1213–1221
Rosell M, Fernández-Recio J (2018) Hot-spot analysis for drug discovery targeting protein-protein interactions. Expert Opin Drug Discov 29:1–12
Kim Y, Benning N, Pham K, Baghdadi N, Caruso G, Colligan M, Grayson A, Hurley A, Ignatoski N, Mcclure S, Mckaig K, Neag E, Showers C, Tangalos A, Vanells J, Padmanabhan K, Burton ZF (2018) Homology threading to generate RNA polymerase structures. Protein Expr Purif 147:13–16
Verma NK, Fazil MH, Ong ST, Chalasani ML, Low JH, Kottaiswamy A, P P, Kizhakeyil A, Kumar S, Panda AK, Freeley M, Smith SM, Boehm BO, Kelleher D (2016) LFA-1/ICAM-1 ligation in human T cells promotes Th1 polarization through a GSK3β signaling-dependent notch pathway. J Immunol 197:108–118
de La Coste A, Freitas AA (2006) Notch signaling: distinct ligands induce specific signals during lymphocyte development and maturation. Immunol Lett 102(1):1–9
Miao CG, Yang YY, He X, Li XF, Huang C, Huang Y, Zhang L, Lv XW, Jin Y, Li J (2013) Wnt signaling pathway in rheumatoid arthritis, with special emphasis on the different roles in synovial inflammation and bone remodeling. Cell Signal 25(10):2069–2078
Šali A, Blundell TL (1993) Comparative protein modeling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. J Mol Biol 234:779–815
Rawat R, Kumar S, Chadha BS, Kumar D, Oberoi HS (2015) An acidothermophilic functionally active novel GH12 family endoglucanase from Aspergillus Niger HO: purification, characterization and molecular interaction studies. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 107:103–117
Fazil MH, Kumar S, Farmer R, Pandey HP, Singh DV (2011) Binding efficiencies of carbohydrate ligands with different genotypes of cholera toxin B: molecular Modeling, dynamics and docking simulation studies. J Mol Model 18:1–10
Abraham MJ, Murtola T, Schulz R, Páll S, Smith JC, Hess B, Lindahl E (2015) GROMACS: high performance molecular simulations through multi-level parallelism from laptops to supercomputers. SoftwareX 1:19–25
Acknowledgments
This work was supported in part by grants from Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University Singapore Start-Up Grant to N.K.V., the Singapore Ministry of Education (MOE) under its MOE Academic Research Fund (AcRF) Tier 1 (2014-T1-001-141) and MOE-AcRF Tier 2 (MOE2017-T2-2-004). J.C.R. acknowledges funding support from the MOE-AcRF Tier 2 grant (MOE2016-T2-1-029).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Kumar, S., Fazil, M.H.U.T., Ahmad, K., Tripathy, M., Rajapakse, J.C., Verma, N.K. (2019). Computational Analysis of Protein–Protein Interactions in Motile T-Cells. In: Verma, N. (eds) T-Cell Motility. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1930. Humana Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-9036-8_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-9036-8_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana Press, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-9035-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-9036-8
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols