Abstract
Antisense oligonucleotide-mediated exon skipping is a promising therapeutic approach for the treatment of various genetic diseases and a therapy which has gained significant traction in recent years following FDA approval of new antisense-based drugs. Exon skipping for Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) works by modulating dystrophin pre-mRNA splicing, preventing incorporation of frame-disrupting exons into the final mRNA product while maintaining the open reading frame, to produce a shortened-yet-functional protein as seen in milder Becker muscular dystrophy (BMD) patients. Exons 45–55 skipping in dystrophin is potentially applicable to approximately 47% of DMD patients because many mutations occur within this “mutation hotspot.” In addition, patients naturally harboring a dystrophin exons 45–55 in-frame deletion mutation have an asymptomatic or exceptionally mild phenotype compared to shorter in-frame deletion mutations in this region. As such, exons 45–55 skipping could transform the DMD phenotype into an asymptomatic or very mild BMD phenotype and rescue nearly a half of DMD patients. In addition, this strategy is potentially applicable to some BMD patients as well, who have in-frame deletion mutations in this region. As the degree of exon skipping correlates with therapeutic outcomes, reliable measurements of exon skipping efficiencies are essential to the development of novel antisense-mediated exon skipping therapeutics. In the case of DMD, researchers have often relied upon human muscle fibers obtained from muscle biopsies for testing; however, this method is highly invasive and patient myofibers can display limited proliferative ability. To overcome these challenges, researchers can generate myofibers from patient fibroblast cells by transducing the cells with a viral vector containing MyoD, a myogenic regulatory factor. Here, we describe a methodology for assessing dystrophin exons 45–55 multiple skipping efficiency using antisense oligonucleotides in human muscle cells derived from DMD patient fibroblast cells.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aartsma-Rus A, Krieg AM (2017) FDA approves eteplirsen for duchenne muscular dystrophy: the next chapter in the eteplirsen saga. Nucleic Acid Ther 27(1):1–3. https://doi.org/10.1089/nat.2016.0657
Stein CA, Castanotto D (2017) FDA-approved oligonucleotide therapies in 2017. Mol Ther 25(5):1069–1075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymthe.2017.03.023
Finkel RS, Chiriboga CA, Vajsar J et al (2016) Treatment of infantile-onset spinal muscular atrophy with nusinersen: a phase 2, open-label, dose-escalation study. Lancet 388(10063):3017–3026. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31408-8
Finkel RS, Mercuri E, Darras BT et al (2017) Nusinersen versus sham control in infantile-onset spinal muscular atrophy. N Engl J Med 377(18):1723–1732. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1702752
Gragoudas ES, Adamis AP, Cunningham ET Jr et al (2004) Pegaptanib for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. N Engl J Med 351(27):2805–2816. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa042760
Raal FJ, Santos RD, Blom DJ et al (2010) Mipomersen, an apolipoprotein B synthesis inhibitor, for lowering of LDL cholesterol concentrations in patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 375(9719):998–1006. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60284-X
Stein C, Castanotto D, Krishnan A et al (2016) Defibrotide (Defitelio): a new addition to the stockpile of food and drug administration-approved oligonucleotide drugs. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids 5:e346. https://doi.org/10.1038/mtna.2016.42
Lee JJ, Yokota T (2013) Antisense therapy in neurology. J Pers Med 3(3):144–176. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm3030144
Lim KR, Maruyama R, Yokota T (2017) Eteplirsen in the treatment of Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Drug Des Devel Ther 11:533–545. https://doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S97635
Nguyen Q, Yokota T (2017) Immortalized muscle cell model to test the exon skipping efficacy for Duchenne muscular dystrophy. J Pers Med 7(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm7040013
Hoffman EP, Brown RH Jr, Kunkel LM (1987) Dystrophin: the protein product of the Duchenne muscular dystrophy locus. Cell 51(6):919–928
Goemans NM, Tulinius M, van den Akker JT et al (2011) Systemic administration of PRO051 in Duchenne's muscular dystrophy. N Engl J Med 364(16):1513–1522. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1011367
Lu QL, Cirak S, Partridge T (2014) What can we learn from clinical trials of exon skipping for DMD? Mol Ther Nucleic Acids 3:e152. https://doi.org/10.1038/mtna.2014.6
Kesselheim AS, Avorn J (2016) Approving a problematic muscular dystrophy drug: implications for FDA policy. JAMA 316(22):2357–2358. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.16437
Nakamura A, Shiba N, Miyazaki D et al (2017) Comparison of the phenotypes of patients harboring in-frame deletions starting at exon 45 in the Duchenne muscular dystrophy gene indicates potential for the development of exon skipping therapy. J Hum Genet 62(4):459–463. https://doi.org/10.1038/jhg.2016.152
Nakamura A, Yoshida K, Fukushima K et al (2008) Follow-up of three patients with a large in-frame deletion of exons 45-55 in the Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) gene. J Clin Neurosci 15(7):757–763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2006.12.012
Taglia A, Petillo R, D'Ambrosio P et al (2015) Clinical features of patients with dystrophinopathy sharing the 45-55 exon deletion of DMD gene. Acta Myol 34(1):9–13
Aslesh T, Maruyama R, Yokota T (2018) Skipping multiple exons to treat DMD—promises and challenges. Biomedicine 6(1):1
Anthony K, Feng L, Arechavala-Gomeza V et al (2012) Exon skipping quantification by quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction in Duchenne muscular dystrophy patients treated with the antisense oligomer eteplirsen. Hum Gene Ther Methods 23(5):336–345. https://doi.org/10.1089/hgtb.2012.117
Verheul RC, van Deutekom JC, Datson NA (2016) Digital droplet PCR for the absolute quantification of exon skipping induced by antisense oligonucleotides in (pre-)clinical development for Duchenne muscular dystrophy. PLoS One 11(9):e0162467. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162467
Anthony K, Arechavala-Gomeza V, Taylor LE et al (2014) Dystrophin quantification: biological and translational research implications. Neurology 83(22):2062–2069. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000001025
Joyce NC, Oskarsson B, Jin LW (2012) Muscle biopsy evaluation in neuromuscular disorders. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 23(3):609–631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmr.2012.06.006
Paasuke R, Eimre M, Piirsoo A et al (2016) Proliferation of human primary myoblasts is associated with altered energy metabolism in dependence on ageing in vivo and in vitro. Oxidative Med Cell Longev 2016:8296150. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/8296150
Lalic T, Vossen RH, Coffa J et al (2005) Deletion and duplication screening in the DMD gene using MLPA. Eur J Hum Genet 13(11):1231–1234. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201465
Muntoni F (2001) Is a muscle biopsy in Duchenne dystrophy really necessary? Neurology 57(4):574–575
Bushby K, Finkel R, Birnkrant DJ et al (2010) Diagnosis and management of Duchenne muscular dystrophy, part 1: diagnosis, and pharmacological and psychosocial management. Lancet Neurol 9(1):77–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70271-6
Liu Z, Fan H, Li Y et al (2008) Experimental studies on the differentiation of fibroblasts into myoblasts induced by MyoD genes in vitro. Int J Biomed Sci 4(1):14–19
Davis RL, Weintraub H, Lassar AB (1987) Expression of a single transfected cDNA converts fibroblasts to myoblasts. Cell 51(6):987–1000
Saito T, Nakamura A, Aoki Y et al (2010) Antisense PMO found in dystrophic dog model was effective in cells from exon 7-deleted DMD patient. PLoS One 5(8):e12239. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012239
Echigoya Y, Duddy W, Lee J et al Exons 45–55 skipping of human dystrophin transcripts using cocktail antisense oligonucleotides. In: Molecular therapy, 2014. Nature publishing group 75 varick st, 9th flr, New York, NY 10013-1917, USA, pp S41–S42
Shimo T, Maruyama R, Yokota T (2018) Designing effective antisense oligonucleotides for exon skipping. Methods Mol Biol 1687:143–155. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7374-3_10
Lee J, Echigoya Y, Duddy W et al (2018) Antisense PMO cocktails effectively skip dystrophin exons 45-55 in myotubes transdifferentiated from DMD patient fibroblasts. PLOS ONE 13 (5):e0197084
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the University of Alberta Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Parent Project Muscular Dystrophy USA, Canadian Institutes of Health Research (grants FRN134134 and 132574), Friends of Garrett Cumming Research Funds, HM Toupin Neurological Science Research Funds, Muscular Dystrophy Canada, Canada Foundation for Innovation (grant 30819), Alberta Enterprise and Advanced Education, Women and Children’s Health Research Institute, Association Française contre les Myopathies, Alberta Innovates—Health Solutions, NIH (grants 5U54HD053177, K26OD011171, and P50AR060836-01), US Department of Defense (grants W81XWH-05-1-0616 and W81XWH-11-1-0782), and NIH NIAMS (training grant 5T32AR056993).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Lee, J.J.A., Saito, T., Duddy, W., Takeda, S., Yokota, T. (2018). Direct Reprogramming of Human DMD Fibroblasts into Myotubes for In Vitro Evaluation of Antisense-Mediated Exon Skipping and Exons 45–55 Skipping Accompanied by Rescue of Dystrophin Expression. In: Yokota, T., Maruyama, R. (eds) Exon Skipping and Inclusion Therapies. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1828. Humana Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-8651-4_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-8651-4_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana Press, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-8650-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-8651-4
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols