Skip to main content

Environmental and Social Influences on Historical County Creation in the United States

  • Chapter
  • 1071 Accesses

Part of the book series: Geotechnologies and the Environment ((GEOTECH,volume 1))

Abstract

This chapter uses a GIScience framework to explore the environmental and social factors that influenced the making of US counties from 1790 through 2000. Existing literature suggests that arbitrary political actions, carrying capacity, and time minimization explain the size and timing of county creation. These theories were examined using updated data and tested for their validity with a historical GIS and statistical analysis. The chapter found that political, sociological, and ecological factors need to be supplemented with geographical considerations, such as elevation, natural amenities, and proximity to like-sized counties to explain the evolution of county creation. This chapter is unique in that it represents a historical approach to GIScience and can be used to inform the geography of governance structures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anselin, L (1990) Spatial dependence and spatial structural instability in applied regression analysis. J Reg Sci 30(2):185–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boulding K (1968) The city as an element in the international system. Daedalus 97:1111–1123

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E (1933) Emile Durkheim on the division of labor in society. Macmillan, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Earle C, Otterstrom SM, Heppen J (1999) The historical United States county boundary files (HUSCO). Geoscience Publications, Baton Rouge, Louisiana

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox JG (1976) Tests of the size-density hypothesis: a caution. Am Sociol Review 41:567–569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant DR, Nixon HC (1968) State and local government in America. Allyn and Bacon, Inc., Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith D, Wong D, and Whitfield T (2003) Exploring relationships between the global and regional measures of spatial autocorrelation. J Reg Sci 43(4):683–710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massey D, Stephan GE (1977) The size-density hypothesis in Great Britain: analysis of a deviant case. Demograph 14(3):351–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, TP (1970) Metropolitics and the urban county. Washington National Press, Inc., Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Mycielski J, Trzeciakowski W (1963) Optimization of the size and location of service stations. J Reg Sci 5(1):59–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nationalatlas.gov (2005) http://nationalatlas.gov/ – 1 October 2008

  • Otterstrom SM, Earle C (2002) The settlement of the United States from 1790–1990: divergent rates of growth and the end of the frontier. J Interdiscip Hist. 33(1):59–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer DS (1973) The placing of service points to minimize travel. Oper Res Q 24(1):121–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuessler K (1974) Analysis of ratio variables: opportunities and pitfalls. Am J Sociol 80(2): 379–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephan GE (1971) Variation in county size: A theory of segmental growth. Am Sociol Review 36:451–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephan GE (1972) International tests of the size-density hypothesis. Am Sociol Review 37: 365–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephan GE (1976) Reply to Fox. Am Sociol Review 41:569–570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephan GE (1979) Political subdivisions and populations density. Sci 205:219–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephan GE, Tedrow LM (1977) A theory of time-minimization: the relationship between urban area and population. Pac Sociol Review 20(1):105–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephan GE, McMullin DR (1981) The historical distribution of county seats in the United States: a review, critique, and test of time-minimization theory. Am Sociol Review 46(6):907–917

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stinchcombe AL (1968) Constructing social theories. Harcourt, Brace & World, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • US Census Bureau www.census.gov – 1 Oct 2008

    Google Scholar 

  • Vining DR, Yang CH, Yeh ST (1979) Political subdivisions and populations density. Sci 205:219

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rancie, K., Otterstrom, S.M., Sanders, J.M., Donaldson, F.J. (2009). Environmental and Social Influences on Historical County Creation in the United States. In: Gatrell, J.D., Jensen, R.R. (eds) Planning and Socioeconomic Applications. Geotechnologies and the Environment, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9642-6_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics