Skip to main content

Government Land Use Interventions: An Economic Analysis

  • Chapter
Urban Land Markets

Abstract

Government interventions affect land use outcomes in cities around the world. These interventions are often well meaning, being designed to achieve ends that are thought to be socially desirable. However, since urban real estate markets are complex systems, land use interventions often generate subsidiary effects that are unanticipated by policy makers. These effects can be undesirable, offsetting the benefits that the interventions were intended to capture. The result can then be a net social loss, so that the land use intervention leaves the urban economy in a worse position than where it started.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alonso, W. (1964). Location and land use. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnott, R. J., & MacKinnon, J. G. (1977). Measuring the costs of height restrictions with a general equilibrium model. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 7(4), 359–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Au, C. C., & Henderson, J. V. (2006). How migration restrictions limit agglomeration and productivity in China. Journal of Development Economics, 80(2), 350–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertaud, A., & Brueckner, J. K. (2004). Analyzing building-height restrictions: Predicted impacts, welfare costs, and a case study of Bangalore, India. Policy Research Working Paper 3290. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bertaud, A., & Brueckner, J. K. (2005). Analyzing building-height restrictions: Predicted impacts and welfare costs. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 35(2), 109–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertaud, A., & Malpezzi, S. (2001). Measuring the costs and benefits of urban land use regulation: A simple model with an application to Malaysia. Journal of Housing Economics, 10(3), 393–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertaud, A., & Malpezzi, S. (2003). The spatial distribution of population in 48 world cities: Implications for economies in transition. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin, School of Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brueckner, J. K. (1996). Welfare gains from removing land-use distortions: An analysis of urban change in post-apartheid South Africa. Journal of Regional Science, 36(1), 91–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brueckner, J. K. (1999). Modeling urban growth controls. In A. Panagariya, P. Portney, & R. M. Schwab (Eds.), Environmental and public economics: Essays in honor of Wallace E. Oates(pp. 151–168). London: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brueckner, J. K. (2001). Urban sprawl: Lessons from urban economics. In J. R. Pack & W. G. Gale (Eds.), Brookings Wharton Papers on Urban Affairs(pp. 65–89). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brueckner, J. K., & Lai, F.-C. (1996). Urban growth controls with resident landowners. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 26(2), 125–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlino, G. A., Chatterjee, S., & Hunt, R. M. (2007). Urban density and the rate of invention. Journal of Urban Economics, 61(3), 381–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheshire, P., & Sheppard, S. (2002). The welfare economics of land use planning. Journal of Urban Economics, 52(2), 242–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciccone, A., & Hall, R. E. (1996). Productivity and the density of economic activity. American Economic Review, 86(1), 54–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaeser, E. L., Gyourko, J., & Saks, R. (2005). Why is Manhattan so expensive? Regulation and the rise in housing prices. Journal of Law and Economics, 48(2), 331–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaeser, E. L., & Ward, B. A. (2009 ). The causes and consequences of land use regulation: Evidence from Greater Boston. Journal of Urban Economics, 65(3), 265–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, R. K., Malpezzi, S., & Mayo, S. K. (2005). Metropolitan-specific estimates of the price elasticity of housing, and their sources. American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, 95(2), 334–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, R. K., Malpezzi, S., & Vandell, K. (1994). Urban regulations and the price of land and housing in Korea. Journal of Housing Economics, 3(4), 330–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannah, L., Kim, K.-H., & Mills, E. S. (1993). Land use controls and housing prices in Korea. Urban Studies, 30(1), 147–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ihlanfeldt, K. R. (2007). The effect of land use regulation on housing and land prices. Journal of Urban Economics, 61(3), 420–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, K.-H. (1993). Housing prices, affordability, and government policy in Korea. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 6(1), 55–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levine, N. (1999). The effects of local growth controls on regional housing production and population distribution in California. Urban Studies, 36(12), 2047–2068.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malpezzi, S., & Mayo, S. K. (1997). Getting housing incentives right: A case study of the effects of regulation, taxes, and subsidies on housing supply in Malaysia. Land Economics, 73(3), 372–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malpezzi, S., Chun, G. H., & Green, R. K. (1998). New place-to-place housing price indexes for U.S. metropolitan areas and their determinants. Real Estate Economics, 26(2), 235–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, C. J., & Somerville, T. (2000). Land use regulation and new construction. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 30(6), 639–662.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayo, S., & Sheppard, S. (2001). Housing supply and the effects of stochastic development control. Journal of Housing Economics, 10(2), 109–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mills, E. S. (1967). An aggregative model of resource allocation in a metropolitan area. American Economic Review, 57(2), 197–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muth, R. F. (1969). Cities and housing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollakowski, H. O., & Wachter, S. M. (1990). The effects of land-use constraints on housing prices. Land Economics, 66(3), 315–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quigley, J. M., & Raphael, S. (2005). Regulation and the high cost of housing in California. American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, 95(2), 323–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renaud, B., & Bertaud, A. (1997). Socialist cities without land markets. Journal of Urban Economics, 41(1), 137–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santerre, R. E., & Bates, L. J. (2001). The public demand for open space: The case of Connecticut communities. Journal of Urban Economics, 50(1), 97–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Son, J.-Y., & Kim, K.-H. (1998). Analysis of urban land shortages: The case of Korean cities. Journal of Urban Economics, 43(3), 362–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, R. (2007). Endogenous open space amenities in a locational equilibrium. Journal of Urban Economics, 61(2), 319–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheaton, W. C. (1974). A comparative static analysis of urban spatial structure. Journal of Economic Theory, 9(2), 223–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 World Bank

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Brueckner, J.K. (2009). Government Land Use Interventions: An Economic Analysis. In: Lall, S.V., Freire, M., Yuen, B., Rajack, R., Helluin, JJ. (eds) Urban Land Markets. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8862-9_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics