Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

From Crime Policy to Victim Policy pp 80–116Cite as

Palgrave Macmillan

Methodological Issues in the Study of Victimization

  • Chapter

Abstract

Victimization surveys collect data on criminal incidents through interviews with their participants. This use of self-reports of past events raises important measurement issues. Participants in a victimization survey are more akin to observers than to respondents in traditional opinion surveys. We assume that people may or may not have been involved in events which have inter-subjective meaning, about which independent observers could agree. The task of interviewers is to elicit accurate reports of those occurrences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abt Associates (1977), Victimization in Joliet and Peoria, Illinois (Cambridge, Mass: Abt Associates).

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics (1975), General social survey – crime victims. Canberra (A.B.S.#) Catalogue no. 4105.0. 22 June 1979 (May).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailar, Barbara A. (1975), “The Effects of Rotation Group Bias on Estimates from Panel Surveys,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 70 (Mar.) 23–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailar, Barbara A. (1976), “Some Sources of Error and Their effect on Census Statistics,” Demography, 13 (May) 273–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailar, Barbara A., Bailey, Leory and Stevens, Joyce (1977), “Measures of Interviewer Bias and Variance,” Journal of Marketing Research, 14 (Aug.) 337–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, Leroy, Moore, Thomas F. and Bailar, Barbara A. (1978), “An Interviewer Variance Study for the Eight Impact Cities of the National Crime Survey Cities Sample, “Journal of the American Statistical Association, 73 (Mar.) 23–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balvanz, Bill (1979), “The Effects of the National Survey of Crime Severity on the Victimization Rates Determined from the National Crime Survey,” Washington, DC: Demographic Surveys Division, US Census Bureau, memorandum, 15 Oct.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biderman, Albert D. (1967), “Surveys of Population Samples for Estimating Crime Incidence,” Annuals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 374 (Nov.) 16–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biderman, Albert D., and Reiss, Jr, Albert J., (1967), “On exploring the ‘dark figure’ of crime,” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 374 (Nov.) 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biderman, Albert D., Johnson, Louise A., McIntyre Jennie, and Weir Adrianne W., (1967) Report on a Pilot Study in the District of Columbia on Victimization and Attitudes Toward Law Enforcement, US President’s Commission on Law Enforcement and Administration of Justice, Field Survey I. (Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office).

    Google Scholar 

  • Biderman, Albert D. (1970a), “Memos Concerning National Crime Survey Developments (Washington, DC: Bureau of Social Science Research, memoranda) 9 Apr. and 10 June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biderman, Albert D. (1970b), “Time Distortions of Victimization and Mnemonic Effects (Washington, DC: Bureau of Social Science Research, memorandum).

    Google Scholar 

  • Biderman, Albert D. (1971), “Memo Concerning National Crime Survey Developments (Washington DC: Bureau of Social Science Research, memorandum).

    Google Scholar 

  • Biderman, Albert D. (1973), “Memo Concerning National Crime Survey Developments (Washington DC: Bureau of Social Science Research, memorandum, Mar.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Biderman, Albert D. (1975), A Social Indicator of Interpersonal Harm (Washington, DC: Bureau of Social Science Research).

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth, Alan, Johnson, David R., and Choldin Harvey M., (1977), “Correlates of City Crime Rates: Victimization Survey Versus Official Statistics,” Social Problems, vol. 25, 187–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckhout, Robert (1974), “Eyewitness Testimony,” Scientific American, vol. 231 (Dec.) 23–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cahalan, Don (1968), “Correlates of Respondent Accuracy in the Denver Validity Survey,” Public Opinion Quarterly, vol. 32 (Winter) 607–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cannell, Charles F., Oksenberg, Lois, and Converse, Jean M. (1979), Experiments in Interviewing Techniques: Field Experiments in Health Reporting, 1971–77 (Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Catlin, Gary, and Murray, Susan (1979), Report on Canadian Victimization Survey Methodological pretests (Ottawa: Statistics Canada).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cirel, Paul, Evans, Patricia, McGillis, Daniel, and Whitcomb, Debra, (1977), Community Crime Prevention Program – Seattle, Washington (Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office).

    Google Scholar 

  • Clausen, Aage R. (1968), “Response Validity: Vote Report,” Public Opinion Quarterly 32 (Winter) 588–606.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corrado, Raymond R., Glackman, William, and Roesch, Ronald (1979), Interim Report One: Extent and Distribution of Victimization (Burnaby, BC: Department of Criminology, Simon Fraser University).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowan, Charles D. (1976). “Twelve and Thirteen-Year-old Interviewing Experiment” Washington, DC: Statistical Research Division, US Census Bureau, memorandum, 8 Apr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowan, Charles D., Murphy, Linda R., and Wiener, Judy (1979), “Effects of Supplemental Questions on Victimization Estimates from the National Crime Survey,” paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Statistical Association, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, Lynn A. (1974), Criminal Violence: National Patterns and Behavior (Lexington, Mass: Lexington Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • De Neufville, Janet (1975), Social Indicators and Public Policy (New York: Elsevier).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodge, Richard W. (1970), “Victim Recall Pretest – Washington, DC” (Washington, DC: US Census Bureau, memorandum, 10 June).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodge, Richard W., and Turner, Anthony G. (1971), “Methodological Foundations for Establishing a National Survey of Victimization,” paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Statistical Association, Aug.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodge, Richard W. (1975), “Series Victimizations: What Is To Be Done?” (Washington, DC: Crime Statistics Analysis Staff, US Census Bureau, memorandum, 31 Oct.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodge, Richard W., Lentzner, Harold, and Shenk, Frederick (1976) “Crime in the United States: a Report on the National Crime Survey,” in Wesley G. Skogan (ed.), Sample Surveys of the Victims of Crime (Cambridge, Mass: Ballinger) pp. 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodge, Richard W. (1977a), “Analysis of Screen Questions on the National Crime Survey” (Washington DC: Crime Statistics Analysis Staff, U.S. Census Bureau, memorandum, 22 Dec).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodge, Richard W. (1977b), “A Preliminary Inquiry into Series Victimizations.” (Washington, DC: Crime Statistics Analysis Staff, US Census Bureau, memorandum, July).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodge, Richard W., and Lentzner, Harold R. (1978), “Patterns of Personal Series Incidents in the National Crime Survey,” paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Statistical Association, San Diego, Calif., 14–17 Aug.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ennis, Philip (1967), Criminal Victimization in the United States: a Report of a National Survey, US President’s Commission on Law Enforcement and Administration of Justice, Field Survey II (Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office).

    Google Scholar 

  • Garofalo, James, and Hindelang, Michael J. (1977), An introduction to the National Crime Survey (Washington, DC: National Criminal Justice Information and Statistics Service, Law Enforcement Assistance Administration. US Department of Justice).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottfredson, Michael R., and Hindelang, Michael J. (1977), “A Consideration of Memory decay and Telescoping Biases in Victimization Surveys,” Journal of Criminal Justice, vol. 5, 202–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, Dorcas (1974), “Reasons for Differences in the Number of Crime Incidents Reported on the Original and Reinterview Survey by Type of Crime, November 1972 to June 1975 (Washington, DC: Statistical Methods Division, US Census Bureau, memorandum, 30 Oct.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, Percy G. (1955), “The Memory Factor in Social Surveys,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 50 (June) 344–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groves, Robert M. (1977), “A Comparison of National Telephone and Personal Interview Surveys: Some Response and Nonresponse Differences,” paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Public Opinion Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groves, Robert M. (1979), “Actors and Questions in Telephone and Personal Interview Surveys.” Public Opinion Quarterly, vol. 43 (Summer) 190–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hindelang, Michael J. (1976), Criminal Victimization in Eight American Cities (Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hindelang, Michael J. (1978), “Race and Involvement in Crimes,” American Sociological Review, vol. 43 (Feb.) 93–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hindelang, Michael J., Gottfredson, Michael R., and James Garofalo (1978), Victims of Personal Crime (Cambridge, Mass: Ballinger).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacob, Herbert (1975), “Crimes, Victims and Statistics: Some Words of Caution” unpublished manuscript (Evanston, III.: Department of Political Science, Northwestern University).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalish, Carol B. (1974), Crimes and Victims: a Report on the Dayton-San-Jose Pilot Survey of Victimization (Washington, DC: National Criminal Justice Information and Statistics Service, Law Enforcement Assistance Administration, US Department of Justice).

    Google Scholar 

  • Klecka, William R., and Tuchfarber, Alfred J. (1974), “The Efficiency Biases, and Problems of Random Digit Dialing,” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Public Opinion Research (June).

    Google Scholar 

  • Klecka, William R., and Tuchfarber, Alfred J. (1978), “Random Digit Dialing: a Comparison to Personal Surveys,” Public Opinion Quarterly, vol. 42 (Spring) 105–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehnen, Robert G., and Reiss, Albert J. Jr (1978), “Some Response Effects in the National Crime Survey,” Victimology, vol. 3, nos. 1–2, 110–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, Elizabeth (1978), “A Twist on the Heisenberg Principle – or How Crime Affects Its Measurement,” unpublished paper (Chapel Hill, NC: Institute for Research in Social Science, University of North Carolina).

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, Linda R., and Cowan, Charles D. (1976), “Effects of Bounding on Telescoping in the National Crime Survey,” paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Statistical Association, Boston, Mass. (23–26 Aug.)

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (1976), Surveying Crime: Report of the Panel for the Evaluation of Crime Surveys (Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences).

    Google Scholar 

  • Neter, John, and Wakeberg, Joseph (1964), “A Study of Response Errors in Expenditures Data from Household Interviews,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 59 (Mar.) 17–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reiss, Albert J., Jr (1969), Field Survey: Appendix A to Crime Against Small Business (Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office).

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiss, Albert J. Jr (1977a), Final Report for Analytical Studies of Victimization Using National Crime Survey Panel Data (New Haven, Conn.: Institution for Policy Studies, Yale University).

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiss, Albert J., Jr (1977b), A Note on Optimal Reference Period of Recall (New Haven, Conn.: Institution for Policy Studies, Yale University, memorandum).

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiss, Albert J., Jr (1978), Final Report for Analytical Studies of Victimization by Crime Using National Crime Survey Panel Data (New Haven, Conn.: Institution for Policy Studies, Yale University).

    Google Scholar 

  • Research Triangle Institute (1977), Analysis of the Utility and Benefits of the National Crime Survey (Research Triangle Park, NC: Research Triangle Institute).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodgers, Theresa F. (1976), “Interviews by Telephone and In-Person: Quality of Responses and Field Performance,” Public Opinion Quarterly, vol. 40 (Spring) 51–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, Anne L. (1976), “Victimization Surveys and Criminal Justice System Evaluation,” in Wesley G. Skogan (ed.), Sample Surveys of the Victims of Crime (Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger) pp. 135–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, Anne L. (1977), The Portland Forward Records Check of Crime Victims: Final Report (Eugene, Oreg.: Institute for Policy Analysis).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwind, Hans-Dieter, Ahlborn, Wilfried, Eger, Hans, Jany, Ulrich, Pudel, Volker, and Weiss, Rudiger (1975), Dunkelfeldforschung in Göttingen 1973/1974 (Wiesbaden: BKA-Forshungsreihe).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shichor, David, Decker, David L., and O’Brien Robert, M (1979), “Population Density and Criminal Victimization,” Criminology, vol. 17 (Aug.) 184–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skogan, Wesley G. (1974), “The Validity of Official Crime Statistics: an Empirical Investigation,” Social Science Quarterly, vol. 55 (June) 25–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skogan, Wesley G. (1975), “Measurement Problems in Official and Survey Crime Rates,” Journal of Criminal Justice, vol. 3 (Spring) 17–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skogan, Wesley G. (1976a), “Citizen Reporting of Crime: Some National Panel data,” Criminology, vol. 13 (Feb.) 535–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skogan, Wesley G. (1976b), “Crime and Crime Rates,” in Wesley G. Skogan (ed.) Sample Surveys of the Victims of Crime (Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger) pp. 105–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skogan, Welsey G., and Klecka, William R. (1977), The Fear of Crime (Washington, DC: American Political Science Association).

    Google Scholar 

  • Skogan, Wesley G. (1978), The Northernwestern University Center for Urban Affairs Random Digit Dialing Telephone Survey (Evanston, Ill.: Center for Urban Affairs, Northernwestern University).

    Google Scholar 

  • Skogan, Wesley G. (1979), “Crime in Contemporary America,” in Hugh Graham and Ted Robert Gurr (eds.), Violence in America, 2nd edn (Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage Publication) ch. 14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skogan, Wesley G. and Maxfield, Michael G. (1980), Coping with Crime: Victimization, Fear and Reactions to Crime in Three American cities (Evanston, Ill. Center for Urban Affairs, North-western University).

    Google Scholar 

  • Small Business Administration (1969), Crime Against Small Business, a Report of the Small Business Administration Transmitted to the Select Committee on Small Business, United States Senate (Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparks, Richard, Hazel G. Genn, and David J. Dodd (1977), Surveying Victims (New York: John Wiley).

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistics Canada (1979), Greater Vancouver Crime Survey Documentation Package 4 vols (Ottawa, Special Surveys Group, Statistics Canada).

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinmetz, Carl (1979), “An Empirically Tested Analysis of Victimization Risks,” paper presented at the Third International Symposium on Victimology (Münster, Germany, 2–8 Sept.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephan, Egon (1975), “Die ergebnisse der Stuttgarter Opferbefragung unter berücksichtigung vergleichbarer Amerikanischer daten,” Kriminalstatistic, vol. 5, 201–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephan, Egon (1976), “Die Stuttgarter Opferbefragung (Wiesbaden, Germany: Bundeskriminalamt).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephan, Egon (n.d.), “Report on Two Studies of the Perception of Crime and Crime Control from the Victim’s Point of View,” unpublished manuscript. (Freiburg, Germany: Max-Planck-Institute)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sudman, Seymour, and Bradburn, Norman M. (1974), Response Effects in Surveys: a Review and Synthesis (Chicago, Ill.: Aldine).

    Google Scholar 

  • Traugott, Michael W., and Katosh, John P. (1979), “Response Validity in Surveys of Voting Behavior,” Public Opinion Quarterly, vol. 43 (Fall) 359–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuchfarber, Alfred, and Klecka, William R. (1976) Random Digit Dialing: Lowering the Cost of Victimization Surveys (Washington, DC: The Police Foundation).

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, Anthony G. (1970), Personal Victimization Pretest: Evaluation of Findings (Washington, DC: Statistical Research Center, Law Enforcement Assistance Administration, memorandum, 17 Apr.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, Anthony G. (1972a), The San Jose Methods Test of Known Crime Victims (Washington, DC: National Criminal Justice Information and Statistics Service, Law Enforcement Assistance Administration, US Department of Justice).

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, Anthony G. (1972b), “Methodological Issues in the Development of the National Crime Survey Panel: Partial findings” (Washington, DC: National Criminal Justice Information and Statistics Service, Law Enforcement Assistance Administration, US Department of Justice, memorandum, Dec.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, Anthony G., and Dodge, Richard W. (1972), “Surveys of Personal and Organizational Victimization,” paper prepared for the Symposium on Studies of Public Experience, Knowledge and Opinion of Crime and Justice (Washington, DC, Mar.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, Anthony G. (1977), “An Experiment to Compare Three Interview Procedures in the National Crime Survey,” (Washington, DC: Statistical Research Division, US Census Bureau, memorandum, Mar.).

    Google Scholar 

  • US Census Bureau (1979), “Survey Documentation: National Crime Survey Central Cities Sample, 1974” (Washington DC: US Census Bureau, memorandum, June).

    Google Scholar 

  • US Department of Justice (1975) Criminal Victimization Surveys in 13 American Cities (Washington, DC: National Criminal Justice Information and Statistics Service, Law Enforcement Assistance Administration).

    Google Scholar 

  • US Department of Justice (1979a), Criminal Victimization in the United States 1976 (Washington, DC: National Criminal Justice Information and Statistics Service, Law Enforcement Assistance Administration).

    Google Scholar 

  • US Department of Justice (1979b) Criminal Victimization in the United States: Summary Findings of 1977–78 Changes in Crime and of Trends since 1973. Washington, DC National Criminal Justice Information and Statistics Service. Law Enforcement Assistance Administration).

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, Carol M. (1968), “Validity of Welfare Mother’s Interview Responses” Public Opinion Quarterly 32 (Winter) 622–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, Preben (1976a), “On Individual Victims of Certain Crimes in Four Scandinavian Countries 1970/74: a Comparative Study” paper presented at the Second International Symposium on Victimology (Boston, 5–11 Sept.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, Preben (1976b), Note on Some of the Methods applied in the Scandinavian Victim Surveys 1970–74 (Kobenhaven: Sociologisk Institut, Kobenhaven Universitet).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfgang, Marvin E. (1978), National survey of crime severity, Grant Report to LEAA-NCJISS, 9 Nov.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woltman, Henry F., Bushery, John, and Carstensen, Larry (1975) “Recall Bias and Telescoping in the National Crime Survey” (Washington, DC: Statistical Methods Division, US Census Bureau, memorandum, 23 Sept.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Woltman, Henry F., and Cadek, Glenn (1977), “Are Memory Biases in the National Crime Survey Associated with the Characteristics of the Criminal Incident?” (Washington, DC: Statistical Methods Division, US Census Bureau memorandum, 4 Apr.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Woltman, Henry F., and Bushery, John M. (1977a), “Update of the National Crime Survey Panel bias Study” (Washington, DC: Statistical Methods Division, US Census Bureau, memorandum, 11 July).

    Google Scholar 

  • Woltman, Henry F., and Bushery, John M. (1977b) “Results of the National Crime Survey Maximum Personal Visit, Maximum Telephone Interview Experiment” (Washington, DC Statistical Methods Division, US Census Bureau, memorandum, 9 Dec.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yost, Linda R., and Dodge, Richard W. (1970), “Household Survey of Victims of Crime: Second Pretest – Baltimore, Maryland” (Washington, DC: US Census Bureau, memorandum, 30 Nov.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimring, Franklin (1972), “The Medium Is the Message: Firearm Caliber as a Determinant of Death from Assault” Journal of Legal Studies, vol. 1 (Jan.) 97–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Wesley G. Skogan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Criminology, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, Canada

    Ezzat A. Fattah (Professor) (Professor)

Copyright information

© 1986 Ezzat A. Fattah

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Skogan, W.G. (1986). Methodological Issues in the Study of Victimization. In: Fattah, E.A. (eds) From Crime Policy to Victim Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-08305-3_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation