Skip to main content
Book cover

Syncope pp 309–327Cite as

When and How: Electrophysiological Study (EPS)

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1372 Accesses

Abstract

The gold standard for diagnosis of arrhythmia-induced syncope is correlation of abnormal ECG findings of spontaneous cardiac arrhythmias with symptoms (i.e., syncope). Obtaining such documentation is usually best achieved by ambulatory electrocardiographic (ECG) recording (e.g., “Holter” monitors, “event” recorders, mobile cardiac outpatient telemetry (MCOT), or insertable loop recorders (ILRs)). However, in many patients it may not be possible to obtain such documentation due to the infrequency of symptomatic events, or concerns regarding patient safety should a spontaneous recurrence be associated with a life-threatening circumstance or potential for physical injury. In such cases, electrophysiological study (EPS) may be warranted in an attempt to obtain at least a plausible cause for the symptoms. This is particularly the case in those individuals with an abnormal ECG and/or evidence underlying structural heart disease.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Moya A, et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of syncope (version 2009). Eur Heart J. 2009;30:2631–2671.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Brignole M, et al. Standardized care pathway vs usual management of syncope patients presenting as emergencies at general hospitals. Europace. 2006;8:644–650.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Benditt DG, et al. Indications for electrophysiologic testing in the diagnosis and assessment of sinus node dysfunction. Circulation. 1987;75(III):93–102.

    Google Scholar 

  4. De Sisti A, et al. Electrophysiologic characteristics of the atrium in sinus node dysfunction: atrial refractoriness and conduction. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2000;11:30–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Yee R, Strauss HC. Electrophysiologic mechanisms: sinus node dysfunction. Circulation. 1987;75(III):12–18.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bergfeldt L, et al. Sinus node recovery time assessment revisited: role of pharmacological blockade of the autonomic nervous system. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1996;7: 95–101.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Rothman SA, et al. The diagnosis of cardiac arrhythmias: a prospective multi-center randomized study comparing mobile cardiac outpatient telemetry versus standard loop event monitoring. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2007;18:241–247.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Narula OS, et al. Significance of the sinus-node recovery time. Circulation. 1972;45:140–148.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. de Marneffe M, et al. Variations of normal sinus node function in relation to age: role of autonomic influence. Eur Heart J. 1986;7:662–666.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. de Marneffe M, et al. The sinus node function: normal and pathological. Eur Heart J. 1993;14:649–654.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Brignole M. Sick sinus syndrome. Clin Geriatr Med. 2002;18:211–227.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gann D, et al. Electrophysiologic evaluation of elderly patients with sinus bradycardia: a long-term follow-up study. Ann Intern Med. 1979;90:24–29.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Menozzi C, et al. The natural course of untreated sick sinus syndrome and identification of the variables predictive of unfavourable outcome. Am J Cardiol. 1998;82:1205–1209.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Brignole M, et al. Mechanism of syncope in patients with bundle branch block and negative electrophysiologic test. Circulation. 2001;104:2045–2050.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Menozzi C, et al. Mechanism of syncope in patients with heart disease and negative electrophysiologic test. Circulation. 2002;105:2741–2745.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Moya A, et al. Mechanism of syncope in patients with isolated syncope and in patients with tilt-positive syncope. Circulation. 2001;104:1261–1267.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Dhingra RC, et al. Significance of block distal to the His bundle induced by atrial pacing in patients with chronic bifascicular block. Circulation. 1979;60:1455–1464.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Petrac D, et al. Prospective evaluation of infrahisal second-degree AV block induced by atrial pacing in the presence of chronic bundle branch block and syncope. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1996;19:679–687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Click R, et al. Role of invasive electrophysiologic testing in patients with symptomatic bundle branch block. Am J Cardiol. 1987;59:817–823.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Gronda M, et al. Electrophysiologic study of atrio-ventricular block and ventricular conduction defects. G Ital Cardiol. 1984;14:768–773.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Dini P, et al. Prognostic value of His-ventricular conduction after ajmaline administration. In: Masoni A, Alboni P, eds. Cardiac Electrophysiology Today. London: Academic Press; 1982:pp 515–522.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Englund A, et al. Pharmacological stress testing of the His-Purkinje system in patients with bifascicular block. Pacing Cardiac Electrophysiol. 1998;21:1979–1987.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Fei L, Trohman RG. Advances in cardiac electrophysiology and pacing. Crit Care Clin. 2001;17:337–364.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Camm AJ, Lau C-P. Syncope of undetermined origin: diagnosis and management. Prog Cardiol. 1988;1:139–156.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Moss AJ, et al. ECG T-wave patterns in genetically distinct forms of the hereditary long QT syndrome. Circulation. 1995;92:2929–2934.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Zipes DP, et al. ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 guidelines for management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death. Circulation. 2006;114: e385–e484.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Priori S. Long QT and Brugada syndromes. From genetics to clinical management. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2000;11:1174–1180.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Lacroix D, et al. Evaluation of arrhythmic causes of syncope: correlation between Holter monitoring, electrophysiologic testing, and body surface potential mapping. Am Heart J. 1991;122:1346–1354.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Knight B, et al. Outcome of patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy and unexplained syncope treated with an implantable defibrillator. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;33: 1964–1970.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Link MS, et al. High incidence of appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy in patients with syncope of unknown etiology and inducible ventricular tachycardia. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;29:370–375.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Militianu A, et al. Implantable cardioverter defibrillator utilization among device recipients presenting exclusively with syncope or near-syncope. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1997;8:1087–1097.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Mittal S, et al. Long-term outcome of patients with unexplained syncope treated with an electrophysiologic-guided approach in the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator era. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;34:1082–1089.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Andrews N, et al. Implantable defibrillator event rates in patients with unexplained syncope and inducible sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;34:2023–2030.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Pires L, et al. Comparison of event rates and survival in patients with unexplained syncope without documented ventricular tachyarrhythmias versus patients with documented sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias both treated with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. Am J Cardiol. 2000;85:725–728.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Fonarow G, et al. Improved survival in patients with nonischemic advanced heart failure and syncope treated with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. Am J Cardiol. 2000;85: 981–985.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Olshansky B, et al. Syncope predicts the outcome of cardiomyopathy patients: Analysis of the SCD-HeFT study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;51:1277–1282.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michele Brignole .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Brignole, M., Benditt, D.G. (2011). When and How: Electrophysiological Study (EPS). In: Syncope. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-201-8_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-201-8_20

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-85729-200-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-85729-201-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics