Skip to main content

Freshwater Microplastic Pollution: The State of Knowledge and Research

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry ((HEC,volume 111))

Abstract

The presence of plastics and microplastics in freshwater ecosystems and biota has been reported in different parts of the world – even in most remote areas. Yet, scientific information on the extent of freshwater microplastic pollution is limited. Comprehensive assessments on plastics and microplastics in freshwater environments at global, regional, and basin scales are lacking. Human health and ecological effects of freshwater microplastic pollution remain unknown. Freshwater microplastic pollution is a new research area recently attracting attention from the academic community. Further research is needed to improve scientific knowledge on microplastic pollution in the world’s freshwater resources and to develop evidence-based appropriate policies and solutions to reduce microplastics in freshwater environments. The role of international scientific programmes such as the International Initiative on Water Quality of UNESCO’s Intergovernmental Hydrological Programme (IHP) will be crucial for research promotion and knowledge generation to fill the knowledge gaps on freshwater microplastic pollution and its human health and ecological impacts.

The chapter focuses on the presence on microplastics in freshwater systems, their sources and pathways and associated potential human health and environmental risks. It presents a summary of the available scientific knowledge and information related to microplastics in freshwater environments, which were reviewed for a preliminary assessment of microplastics in freshwater environments conducted by UNESCO-IHP’s International Initiative on Water Quality between 2015 and 2017. Some studies published more recently have been included. It highlights knowledge gaps and research needs on freshwater microplastic pollution and recommends appropriate policies and solutions to prevent and reduce the discharge of microplastics to freshwater environments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. UNESCO and HELCOM (2018) Pharmaceuticals in the aquatic environment of the Baltic Sea region - a status report. UNESCO emerging pollutants in water series, vol 1. UNESCO Publishing https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000247889?

  2. WHO (2020) Water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH). World Health Organization (WHO). https://www.who.int/health-topics/water-sanitation-and-hygiene-wash

  3. UN (2020) Sustainable development goal 6: ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all – Progress and Info. United Nations, sustainable development. https://sdgs.un.org/goals/goal6

  4. IPBES (2019) In: Brondizio ES et al (eds) Global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES), Chapter 2.1: status and trends – drivers of change. IPBES Secretariat. https://ipbes.net/global-assessment

  5. IPBES (2019) In: Díaz S et al (eds) Summary for policymakers of the global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES). IPBES Secretariat. https://ipbes.net/sites/default/files/2020-02/ipbes_global_assessment_report_summary_for_policymakers_en.pdf

  6. UN (2020) Sustainable development goals. United Nations. https://sdgs.un.org/goals

  7. Godoy V et al (2019) The potential of microplastics as carriers of metals. Environ Pollut 255(3):113363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113363

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Plastics Europe (2016) Plastics – the facts 2016: an analysis of European plastics production, Demand and waste data. https://www.plasticseurope.org/en/resources/publications/3-plastics-facts-2016

  9. Geyer R, Jambeck JR, Law KL (2017) Production, use, and fate of all plastics ever made. Sci Adv 3(7):e1700782. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1700782

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Arthur C, Baker J, Bamford H (2009) Proceedings of the international research workshop on the occurrence, effects and fate of microplastic marine debris (Sept. 9–11, 2008). NOAA Technical Memorandum NOS-OR&R30. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Proceedings-of-the-International-Research-Workshop-Arthur-Baker/7f8c9dd6437a34f96812836c66ca83d69f7ea9eb?p2df

  11. Gigault J et al (2018) What is a nanoplastic? Environ Pollut 235:1030–1034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.01.024

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Napper IE et al (2015) Characterisation, quantity and sorptive properties of microplastics extracted from cosmetics. Mar Pollut Bull 99:178–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2015.07.029

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Karlsson TM et al (2018) The unaccountability case of plastic pellet pollution. Mar Pollut Bull 129(1):52–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.01.041

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Turner A, Holmes LA (2015) Adsorption of trace metals by microplastic pellets in fresh water. Environ Chem 12:600–610. https://doi.org/10.1071/EN14143

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Browne MA et al (2011) Accumulation of microplastic on shorelines worldwide: sources and sinks. Environ Sci Technol 45(21):9175–9179. https://doi.org/10.1021/es201811s

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Essel R et al (2015) Sources of microplastics relevant to marine protection in Germany. Federal Environment Agency of Germany. TEXTE 64/2015, Project no. 31969, Report no. (UBA-FB) 002147/E. http://www.umweltbundesamt.de/publikationen/sources-of-microplastics-relevant-to-marine

  17. Conley K et al (2019) Wastewater treatment plants as a source of microplastics to an urban estuary: removal efficiencies and loading per capita over one year. Water Res X3:100030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wroa.2019.100030

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Dris R, Gasperi J, Tassin B (2014) Assessing the microplastics in urban effluents and in the Seine River (Paris). https://hal-enpc.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00968276

  19. Horton AA et al (2017) Large microplastic particles in sediments of tributaries of the river Thames, UK – abundance, sources and methods for effective quantification. Mar Pollut Bull 114(1):218–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.09.004

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Cole M et al (2011) Microplastics as contaminants in the marine environment: a review. Mar Pollut Bull 62(12):2588–2597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2011.09.025

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. UNESCO (2021) Microplastics in freshwater environments, UNESCO emerging pollutants in water series, vol 2. UNESCO Publishing (inpress)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Mani TA et al (2015) Microplastics profile along the Rhine River. Sci Rep 5:17988. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep17988

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Free CM et al (2014) High-levels of microplastic pollution in a large, remote, mountain lake. Mar Pollut Bull 85:156–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2014.06.001

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Geological Society of America (2020) Microplastics in groundwater (and our drinking water) present unknown risk: presentation at the 2020 annual meeting of the Geological Society of America. Science Daily. http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2020/10/201026153939.htm

  25. Mintenig SM et al (2019) Low numbers of microplastics detected in drinking water from ground water sources. Sci Total Environ 648:631–635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.178

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Panno SV et al (2019) Microplastic contamination in karst groundwater systems. Groundwater 57(2):189–196. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwat.12862

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Kosuth M, Mason SA, Wattenberg EV (2018) Anthropogenic contamination of tap water, beer, and sea salt. PLoS One 13(4):e0194970. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194970

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Mason SA, Welch VG, Neratko J (2018) Synthetic polymer contamination in bottled water. Front Chem 6:407. https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2018.00407

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Ossmann B et al (2018) Small-sized microplastics and pigmented particles in bottled mineral water. Water Res 141:307–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2018.05.027

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Koelmans AA et al (2019) Microplastics in freshwaters and drinking water: critical review and assessment of data quality. Water Res 155:410–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2019.02.054

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. WHO (2019) Microplastics in drinking-water. World Health Organization (WHO). https://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/publications/microplastics-in-drinking-water/en/

  32. Wagner M et al (2014) Microplastics in freshwater ecosystems: what we know and what we need to know. Environ Sci Eur 26:12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-014-0012-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Anderson JC, Park BJ, Palace VP (2016) Microplastics in aquatic environments: implications for Canadian ecosystems. Environ Pollut 218:269–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2016.06.074

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Silva-Cavalcanti JS et al (2017) Microplastics ingestion by a common tropic freshwater fishing resources. Environ Pollut 221:218–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2016.11.068

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. de Sá LC et al (2018) Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: what do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future? Sci Total Environ 645:1029–1039. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.207

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Slootmaekers B et al (2019) Microplastic contamination in gudgeons (Gobio gobio) from Flemish rivers (Belgium). Environ Pollut 244:675–684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.09.136

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Hurt R, O’Reilly CM, Perry WL (2020) Microplastic prevalence in two fish species in two US reservoirs. Limnology and oceanography letters 5: special issue: microplastics in marine and freshwater organisms: presence and potential effects. https://doi.org/10.1002/lol2.10140

  38. Imhof HK et al (2013) Contamination of beach sediments of a subalpine lake with microplastic particles. Curr Biol 23:R867–R868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2013.09.001

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Von Moos N, Burkhardt-Holm P, Köhler A (2012) Uptake and effects of microplastics on cells and tissue of the blue mussel Mytilus edulis L. after an experimental expo-sure. Environ Sci Technol 46:11327–11335. https://doi.org/10.1021/es302332w

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Blarer P, Burkhardt-Holm P (2016) Microplastics affect assimilation efficiency in the freshwater amphipod Gammarus fossarum. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:23522–23532. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-7584-2

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Aljaibachi R, Callaghan A (2018) Impact of polystyrene microplastics on Daphnia magna mortality and reproduction in relation to food availability. Peer J 6:e4601. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4601

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Andrady AL, Neal MA (2009) Applications and societal benefits of plastics. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 364:1977–1984. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2008.0304

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Meeker JD, Sathyanarayana S, Swan SH (2009) Phthalates and other additives in plastics: human exposure and associated health outcomes. Philos Trans R Soc B 364:2097–2113. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2008.0268

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Oehlmann J et al (2009) A critical analysis of the biological impacts of plasticizers on wildlife. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 364:2047–2062. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2008.0242

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Talsness CE et al (2009) Components of plastic: experimental studies in animals and relevance for human health. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 364(1526):2079–2096. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2008.0281

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Le HH et al (2008) Bisphenol A is released from polycarbonate drinking bottles and mimics the neurotoxic actions of estrogen in developing cerebellar neurons. Toxicol Lett 176(2):149–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxlet.2007.11.001

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. UN Environment (2018) Legal limits on single-use plastics and microplastics: a global review of national laws and regulations. https://www.unenvironment.org

  48. Kelly A et al (2020) Microplastic contamination in east Antarctic sea ice. Mar Pollut Bull 154:111130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.111130

Download references

Acknowledgements

The initial UNESCO case study on microplastics in freshwater was conducted in the framework of the UNESCO Project on Emerging Pollutants in Water, with the funding from the Government of Sweden through its Programme Cooperation Agreement with UNESCO (2014-2018). The UNESCO’s work on microplastics in freshwater has further benefitted from scientific expertise of researchers from around the world. In particular, UNESCO-IHP’s International Initiative on Water Quality wishes to thank (in alphabetical order): Michiel Roscam Abbing, Plastic Soup Foundation (the Netherlands); Nicole Brennholt, Federal Institute of Hydrology (Germany); Michiel De Smet, European Commission; Nanna B. Hartmann, Technical University of Denmark (Denmark); Alice A. Horton, Centre for Ecology and Hydrology (United Kingdom); Liv Jaeckel, Technical University of Freiberg and HHL Leipzig Graduate School of Management (Germany); Johanna Kramm, Institute for Social-Ecological Research (Germany); Helen Lynn, University of Stirling (United Kingdom); Margriet Samwel, Women Engage for a Common Future (the Netherlands); Friederike Stock, Federal Institute of Hydrology (Germany); Maria Antonia N. Tanchuling, University of the Philippines (the Philippines); and Martin Wagner, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (Norway). The results of the UNESCO’s work on microplastics in freshwater environments will be published in Microplastics in Freshwater Environments (upcoming) as volume 2 of the UNESCO Series on Emerging Pollutants in Water.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sarantuyaa Zandaryaa .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Zandaryaa, S. (2021). Freshwater Microplastic Pollution: The State of Knowledge and Research. In: Stock, F., Reifferscheid, G., Brennholt, N., Kostianaia, E. (eds) Plastics in the Aquatic Environment - Part I. The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry, vol 111. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/698_2021_748

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics