Skip to main content

Multi-linearity Self-Testing with Relative Error

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 1770))

Abstract

We investigate self-testing programs with relative error by allowing error terms proportional to the function to be computed. Until now, in numerical computation, error terms were assumed to be either constant or proportional to the p-th power of the magnitude of the input, for p ∈ [0, 1). We construct new self-testers with relative error for realvalued multi-linear functions defined over finite rational domains. The existence of such self-testers positively solves an open question in [KMS99]. Moreover, our self-testers are very efficient: they use few queries and simple operations.

Partially supported by a CNRS-Conicyt’98 Project, ESPRIT Working Group RAND2 No. 21726, and Franco-Hungarian bilateral project Balaton No. 99013.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. S. Ar, M. Blum, B. Codenotti, and P. Gemmell. Checking approximate computations over the reals. In Proc. 25th STOC, pages 786–795, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  2. S. Arora, C. Lund, R. Motwani, M. Sudan, and M. Szegedy. Proof verification and intractibility of approximation problems. In Proc. 33rd FOCS, pages 14–23, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  3. S. Arora and S. Safra. Probabilistic checkable proofs: A new characterization of NP. In Proc. 33rd FOCS, pages 1–13, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  4. L. Babai. Transparent (holographic) proofs. In Proc. 10th STACS, volume 665, pages 525–534. LNCS, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  5. M. Blum and S. Kannan. Designing programs that check their work. J. ACM, 42(1):269–291, 1995.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. M. Blum, M. Luby, and R. Rubinfeld. Self-testing/correcting with applications to numerical problems. J. Comp. and Syst. Sci., pages 549–595, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  7. M. Blum. Designing programs to check their work. Technical Report 88-009, ICSI, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  8. D. Coppersmith, December 1989. See discussion in [BLR93].

    Google Scholar 

  9. F. Ergün, S. Ravi Kumar, and R. Rubinfeld. Approximate checking of polynomials and functional equations. In Proc. 37th FOCS, pages 592–601, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  10. K. Friedl, Z. Hátsági, and A. Shen. Low-degree tests. Proc. 5th SODA, pages 57–64, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  11. G. L. Forti. Hyers-Ulam stability of functional equations in several variables. Aeq. Mathematicae, 50:143–190, 1995.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. O. Goldreich, S. Goldwasser, and D. Ron. Property testing and its connection to learning and approximation. In Proc. 37th FOCS, pages 339–348, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  13. P. Gemmell, R. Lipton, R. Rubinfeld, M. Sudan, and A. Wigderson. Selftesting/correcting for polynomials and for approximate functions. In Proc. 23rd STOC, pages 32–42, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  14. O. Goldreich and D. Ron. Property testing in bounded degree graphs. In Proc. 37th STOC, pages 406–415, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  15. D. H. Hyers and T. M. Rassias. Approximate homomorphisms. Aeq. Mathematicae, 44:125–153, 1992.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. D. H. Hyers and P. Šemrl. On the behaviour of mappings which do not satisfy Hyers-Ulam stability. Proc. AMS, 144(4):989–993, April 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  17. D. H. Hyers. On the stability of the linear functional equation. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., U.S.A., 27:222–224, 1941.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. M. Kiwi, F. Magniez, and M. Santha. Approximate testing with relative error. In Proc. 31st STOC, pages 51–60, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  19. R. Lipton. New directions in testing. Series in Discrete Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science, 2:191–202, 1991.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. R. Rubinfeld and M. Sudan. Robust characterizations of polynomials with applications to program testing. SIAM J. Comp., 25(2):23–32, April 1996.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. R. Rubinfeld. On the robustness of functional equations. SIAM J. Comp., 28(6):1972–1997, 1999.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. F. Skof. Sull’approssimazione delle applicazioni localmente δ-additive. Atti Acc. Sci. Torino, 117:377–389, 1983. in Italian.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Magniez, F. (2000). Multi-linearity Self-Testing with Relative Error. In: Reichel, H., Tison, S. (eds) STACS 2000. STACS 2000. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1770. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-46541-3_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-46541-3_25

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-67141-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-46541-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics