This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Boguraev, B., Briscoe, E., Carroll, J., Carter, D., and Grover, C. (1987). The derivation of a grammatically indexed lexicon from the Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English. Proceedings of the 25th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL87), Stanford, CA: 193–200.
Briscoe, E. and Carroll, J. (2002). Robust accurate statistical annotation of general text. Proceedings of the 3rd Int. Conference on Language Resources and Corpora (LREC02), Las Palmas, Gran Canaria: 1499–1504.
Carabello, S. and Charniak, E. (1998). New figures of merit for best-first probabilistic chart parsing. Computational Linguistics 24.2: 275–298.
Carroll, J. and Briscoe, E. (2002). High precision extraction of grammatical relations. Proceedings of the 19th Int. Conference on Computational Linguistics (Coling02), Taipei, Taiwan: 134–140.
Charniak, E. (2000). A maximum entropy inspired parser. 1st Annual Meeting Nth. American Association for Computational Linguistics Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA: 132–139.
Church, K. and Patil, R. (1982). Coping with syntactic ambiguity or how to put the block in the box on the table. Computational Linguistics 8: 139–149.
Collins, M. (1999). Head-driven statistical models for natural language parsing. PhD Dissertation, Computer and Information Science, University of Pennsylvania.
Copestake, A. and Lascarides, A. (1997). Integrating symbolic and statistical representations: the lexicon-pragmatics interface. Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and 8th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL-EACL 97), Madrid: 136–143.
Copestake, A. and Flickinger, D. (2000). An open-source grammar development environment and broad-coverage English grammar using HPSG. Proceedings of the Second conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC-2000), Athens, Greece: 591–600.
Copestake, A. (2002). Implementing Type Feature Structure Grammars. CSLI Publications.
Copestake, A., Lambeau, F., Villavicencio, A., Bond, F., Baldwin, T., Sag, I.A., Flickinger, D. (2002). Multiword expressions: linguistic precision and reusability. Proceedings of the Third conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC-2002), Las Palmas, Canary Islands: 1941–1947.
Copestake, A. (2003). “Report on the design of RMRS.” Deliverable 1.1a: DeepThought — Hybrid Deep and Shallow Methods for Knowledge-Intensive Information Extraction
Copestake, A., Flickinger, D., Sag, I.A. and Pollard, C. (in press). “Minimal Recursion Semantics: An Introduction.” Journal of Research in Language and Computation.
Downing, P. (1977). On the Creation and Use of English Compound Nouns. Language 53(4): 810–842.
Fellbaum, C. (editor) (1998). Wordnet, An Electronic Lexical Database. MIT Press.
Hirst, G. (1983). Seman interpretation against ambiguity. TR-CS-83-25, Dept. of Computer Science, Brown University.
Hobbs, J.R., Stickel, M., Appelt, D., and Martin, P. (1993). Interpretation as Abduction. Artificial Intelligence 63.1: 69–142.
Johnston, M. and Busa, F.. (1996). Qualia structure and the compositional interpretation of compounds. Proceedings of the ACL SIGLEX workshop on breadth and depth of semantic lexicons, Santa Cruz, CA.
Kay, M. (1973). “The MIND system.” In Natural Language Processing, edited by R. Rustin, R.. Algorithmics Press, New York, 155–188.
Lapata, M. (2002). The disambiguation of nominalisations. Computational linguistics 28:3: 357–388.
Lapata, M. and Lascarides, A. (2003a). Detecting novel compounds: the role of distributional evidence. Proceedings of the 10th conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (EACL-03), Budapest: 235–242.
Lapata, M. and Lascarides, A. (2003b). A probabilistic account of logical metonymy. Computational Linguistics 29(2) 263–317.
Lauer, M. (1995). Designing Statistical Language Learners: Experiments on Compound Nouns. Ph.D. thesis, Macquarie University, Sydney.
Leonard, R. (1984). The Interpretation of English Noun Sequences on the Computer. North-Holland, Amsterdam.
Levi, J. (1978). The syntax and semantics of complex nominals. Academic Press, New York.
Liberman, M. and Sproat, R. (1992). “The stress and structure of modified noun phrases in English.” In Lexical matters, edited by I.A. Sag and A. Szabolsci. CSLI Publications, 131–182.
Marcus, M. (1980). A Theory of Syntactic recognition for Natural Language. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Pustejovsky, J. (1995). The Generative Lexicon. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Rosario, B. and Hearst, M.. (2001). Classifying the semantic relations in noun compounds via a domain-specific lexical hierarchy. Proceedings of the Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Pittsburgh.
Sparck Jones, K. (1983). “So what about parsing compound nouns?.” In Automatic natural language parsing, edited by K. Sparck Jones and Y. Wilks. Ellis Horwood, Chichester, England, 164–168.
Tomita, M. (1987). An efficient augmented-context-free parsing algorithm. Computational Linguistics 13.1: 31–46.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Copestake, A., Briscoe, E. (2005). Noun Compounds Revisited. In: Tait, J.I. (eds) Charting a New Course: Natural Language Processing and Information Retrieval. The Kluwer International Series on Information Retrieval, vol 16. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3467-9_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3467-9_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-3343-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-3467-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)