Abstract
Purpose
Individuals with systemic autoimmune disease have an increased susceptibility to both inflammation and malignancy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical usefulness of 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with systemic autoimmune disease.
Methods
Forty patients diagnosed with systemic autoimmune disease were enrolled. Diagnostic accuracy of FDG PET/CT for detecting malignancy was assessed. FDG PET/CT findings, including maximum standardized uptake (SUVmax) of lymphadenopathy (LAP), liver, bone marrow, spleen, joint and muscles, were considered for the characterization of LAPs.
Results
FDG PET/CT could detect metabolically activated lesions in 36 out of 40 patients (90%) including inflammatory lesions in 28 out of 32 patients (88%). The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of FDG PET/CT for the detection of malignancy were 100, 67, 70, 25, and 100%, respectively. Multiple LAPs were found in 25 of 40 patients (63%), and comprised three malignancies, four cases of tuberculosis, and 18 reactive changes. A SUVmax ratio of bone marrow to liver below 0.78 could distinguish malignancy from tuberculosis + reactive change (AUC = 1.000, sensitivity: 100%, specificity: 100%). The SUVmax ratio of spleen to liver in the reactive group was also significantly higher than that in the malignancy group (P = 0.014). SUVmax of LAP in the TB group was significantly higher than that in the reactive group (P = 0.040).
Conclusions
PET/CT is useful in detecting and differentiating inflammation and malignancy in patients with systemic autoimmune disease. Frequent false-positive interpretations can be minimized by consideration of FDG uptake in bone marrow and spleen.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ramos-Casals M, Brito-Zeron P, Lopez-Soto A, Font J. Systemic autoimmune diseases in elderly patients: atypical presentation and association with neoplasia. Autoimmun Rev. 2004;3:376–82.
Kiss E, Kovacs L, Szodoray P. Malignancies in systemic lupus erythematosus. Autoimmun Rev. 2010;9:195–9.
O’Byrne KJ, Dalgleish AG. Chronic immune activation and inflammation as the cause of malignancy. Br J Cancer. 2001;85:473–83.
Sela O, Shoenfeld Y. Cancer in autoimmune diseases. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 1988;18:77–87.
Carter PH, Zhao Q. Clinically validated approaches to the treatment of autoimmune diseases. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2010;19:195–213.
Basu S, Chryssikos T, Moghadam-Kia S, Zhuang H, Torigian DA, Alavi A. Positron emission tomography as a diagnostic tool in infection: present role and future possibilities. Semin Nucl Med. 2009;39:36–51.
Gotthardt M, Bleeker-Rovers CP, Boerman OC, Oyen WJ. Imaging of inflammation by PET, conventional scintigraphy, and other imaging techniques. J Nucl Med. 2010;51:1937–49.
Chung HH, Nam BH, Kim JW, Kang KW, Park NH, Song YS, et al. Preoperative [18F]FDG PET/CT maximum standardized uptake value predicts recurrence of uterine cervical cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2010;37:1467–73.
Kumar TS, Aggarwal A. Approach to a patient with connective tissue disease. Indian J Pediatr. 2010;77:1157–64.
Beckers C, Ribbens C, Andre B, Marcelis S, Kaye O, Mathy L, et al. Assessment of disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis with (18)F-FDG PET. J Nucl Med. 2004;45:956–64.
Choe JY, Chung DS, Park SH, Kwon HH, Kim SK. Clinical significance of (1)F-fluoro-dexoxyglucose positron emission tomography in patients with adult-onset Still’s disease: report of two cases and review of literatures. Rheumatol Int. 2010;30:1673–6.
dos Anjos DA, do Vale GF, Campos Cde M, do Prado LF, Sobrinho AB, da Cunha AL et al. Extra-articular inflammatory sites detected by F-18 FDG PET/CT in a patient with rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Nucl Med. 2010;35:540–1.
Elzinga EH, van der Laken CJ, Comans EF, Boellaard R, Hoekstra OS, Dijkmans BA, et al. 18F-FDG PET as a tool to predict the clinical outcome of infliximab treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: an explorative study. J Nucl Med. 2011;52:77–80.
Funauchi M, Ikoma S, Kishimoto K, Shimazu H, Nozaki Y, Sugiyama M, et al. A case of adult onset Still’s disease showing marked accumulation in the liver and spleen, on positron emission tomography-CT images. Rheumatol Int. 2008;28:1061–4.
Jadvar H, Bonyadlou S, Iagaru A, Colletti PM. FDG PET-CT demonstration of Sjogren’s sialoadenitis. Clin Nucl Med. 2005;30:698–9.
Kubota K, Ito K, Morooka M, Mitsumoto T, Kurihara K, Yamashita H, et al. Whole-body FDG-PET/CT on rheumatoid arthritis of large joints. Ann Nucl Med. 2009;23:783–91.
Nishiyama Y, Yamamoto Y, Dobashi H, Kameda T. Clinical value of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in patients with connective tissue disease. Jpn J Radiol. 2010;28:405–13.
Nowak M, Carrasquillo JA, Yarboro CH, Bacharach SL, Whatley M, Valencia X, et al. A pilot study of the use of 2-[18F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose-positron emission tomography to assess the distribution of activated lymphocytes in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;50:1233–8.
Anderson LA, Gadalla S, Morton LM, Landgren O, Pfeiffer R, Warren JL, et al. Population-based study of autoimmune conditions and the risk of specific lymphoid malignancies. Int J Cancer. 2009;125:398–405.
Smedby KE, Askling J, Mariette X, Baecklund E. Autoimmune and inflammatory disorders and risk of malignant lymphomas—an update. J Intern Med. 2008;264:514–27.
Soderberg KC, Jonsson F, Winqvist O, Hagmar L, Feychting M. Autoimmune diseases, asthma and risk of haematological malignancies: a nationwide case-control study in Sweden. Eur J Cancer. 2006;42:3028–33.
Volkers N. Do autoimmune diseases raise the risk of cancer? J Natl Cancer Inst. 1999;91:1992–3.
Parikh-Patel A, White RH, Allen M, Cress R. Risk of cancer among rheumatoid arthritis patients in California. Cancer Causes Control. 2009;20:1001–10.
Moulin-Romsee G, Hindie E, Cuenca X, Brice P, Decaudin D, Benamor M, et al. (18)F-FDG PET/CT bone/bone marrow findings in Hodgkin’s lymphoma may circumvent the use of bone marrow trephine biopsy at diagnosis staging. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2010;37:1095–105.
Paes FM, Kalkanis DG, Sideras PA, Serafini AN. FDG PET/CT of extranodal involvement in non-Hodgkin lymphoma and Hodgkin disease. Radiographics. 2010;30:269–91.
Pelosi E, Penna D, Douroukas A, Bello M, Amati A, Arena V et al. Bone marrow disease detection with FDG-PET/CT and bone marrow biopsy during the staging of malignant lymphoma: results from a large multicentre study. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2010. Dec 9. [Epub ahead of print]
Salaun PY, Gastinne T, Bodet-Milin C, Campion L, Cambefort P, Moreau A, et al. Analysis of 18F-FDG PET diffuse bone marrow uptake and splenic uptake in staging of Hodgkin’s lymphoma: a reflection of disease infiltration or just inflammation? Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2009;36:1813–21.
Zampieri S, Ghirardello A, Iaccarino L, Briani C, Sarzi-Puttini P, Atzeni F, et al. Polymyositis-dermatomyositis and infections. Autoimmunity. 2006;39:191–6.
Zandman-Goddard G, Shoenfeld Y. Infections and SLE. Autoimmunity. 2005;38:473–85.
Schneeweiss S, Setoguchi S, Weinblatt ME, Katz JN, Avorn J, Sax PE, et al. Anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha therapy and the risk of serious bacterial infections in elderly patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2007;56:1754–64.
Patkar NM, Teng GG, Curtis JR, Saag KG. Association of infections and tuberculosis with antitumor necrosis factor alpha therapy. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2008;20:320–6.
Sathekge M, Maes A, Kgomo M, Pottel H, Stolz A, Van De Wiele C. FDG uptake in lymph-nodes of HIV+ and tuberculosis patients: implications for cancer staging. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2010;54:698–703.
Deol P, Vohra R, Saini AK, Singh A, Chandra H, Chopra P, et al. Role of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Ser/Thr kinase PknF: implications in glucose transport and cell division. J Bacteriol. 2005;187:3415–20.
Conflict of interest
None declared.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Oh, JR., Song, HC., Kang, SR. et al. The Clinical Usefulness of 18F-FDG PET/CT in Patients with Systemic Autoimmune Disease. Nucl Med Mol Imaging 45, 177–184 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13139-011-0094-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13139-011-0094-8