Abstract
Painful chondral defects of the knee are very difficult problems. The incidence of these lesions in the general population is not known since there is likely a high rate of asymptomatic lesions. The rate of lesions found during arthroscopic exam is highly variable, with reports ranging from 11 to 72 % Aroen (Aroen Am J Sports Med 32: 211-5, 2004); Curl(Arthroscopy13: 456-60, 1997); Figueroa(Arthroscopy 23(3):312-5, 2007;); Hjelle(Arthroscopy 18: 730-4, 2002). Examples of current attempts at cartilage restoration include marrow stimulating techniques, ostochondral autografts, osteochondral allografts, and autologous chondrocyte transplantation. Current research in marrow stimulating techniques has been focused on enhancing and guiding the biology of microfracture and other traditional techniques. Modern advances in stem cell biology and biotechnology have provided many avenues for exploration. The purpose of this work is to review current techniques in marrow stimulating techniques as it relates to chondral damage of the knee.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance
Aroen A, Loken S, et al. Articular cartilage lesions in 993 consecutive knee arthroscopies. Am J Sports Med. 2004;32:211–5.
Curl WW, Krome J, Gordon ES, et al. Cartilage injuries: a review of 31,516 knee arthroscopies. Arthroscopy. 1997;13:456–60.
Figueroa D, Calvo R, et al. Knee chondral lesions: incidence and correlation between arthroscopic and magnetic resonance findings. Arthroscopy. 2007;23(3):312–5.
Hjelle K, Solheim E, et al. Articular cartilage defects in 1,000 knee arthroscopies. Arthroscopy. 2002;18:730–4.
Pridie KH, Gordon G. A method of resurfacing osteoarthritic knee joints. J Bone Joint Surg. 1959;41(3):618–9.
Johnson LL. Arthroscopic abrasion arthroplasty historical and pathologic perspective: present status. Arthrosc: J Arthrosc Relat Surg. 1986;2(1):54–69.
Bert, Jack M. Abandoning microfracture of the knee: has the time come? Arthrosc: J Arthrosc Relat Surg. 2015;31(3):501–5.
Bert JM, Maschka K. The arthroscopic treatment of unicompartmental gonarthrosis: a five-year follow-up study of abrasion arthroplasty plus arthroscopic debridement and arthroscopic debridement alone. Arthrosc: J Arthrosc RelatSurg. 1989;5(1):25–32.
Steadman JR et al. Outcomes of microfracture for traumatic chondral defects of the knee: average 11-year follow-up. Arthrosc: J Arthrosc Relat Surg. 2003;19(5):477–84.
Steadman X, Richard J, et al. Microfracture technique for full-thickness chondral defects: technique and clinical results. Oper Tech Orthop. 1997;7(4):300–4.
Mithoefer K et al. The microfracture technique for the treatment of articular cartilage lesions in the knee. J Bone Joint Surg. 2005;87(9):1911–20.
Steinwachs MR, Guggi T, Kreuz PC. Marrow stimulation techniques. Injury. 2008;39(1):26–31.
Dowthwaite GP et al. The surface of articular cartilage contains a progenitor cell population. J Cell Sci. 2004;117(6):889–97.
Shah MR et al. Articular cartilage restoration of the knee. Bull-Hosp Joint Dis New York. 2007;65(1):51.
Camp CL, Stuart MJ, Krych AJ. Current concepts of articular cartilage restoration techniques in the knee. Sports Health: Multidiscip Approach. 2014;6(3):265–73.
Goyal D et al. Evidence-based status of microfracture technique: a systematic review of level I and II studies. Arthrosc: J Arthrosc Relat Surg. 2013;29(9):1579–88.
Solheim E, et al. Results at 10–14 years after microfracture treatment of articular cartilage defects in the knee. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc (2014); 1–7.
Bae, Dae K, et al. Survival analysis of microfracture in the osteoarthritic knee—,minimum 10-year follow-up. Arthroscopy: J Arthrosc Related Surg. 2013;29(2):244–50. Long term microfracture results.
Gobbi A, Karnatzikos G, Kumar A. Long-term results after microfracture treatment for full-thickness knee chondral lesions in athletes. Knee Surg, Sports Traumatol, Arthroscopy Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc (2013); 1986–996.
Kroell, A. et al. Microfracture for chondral defects: assessment of the variability of surgical technique in cadavers. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatol, Arthrosc (2014): 1–6.
Chen H et al. Depth of subchondral perforation influences the outcome of bone marrow stimulation cartilage repair. J Orthop Res. 2011;29(8):1178–84.
Eldracher M et al. Small subchondral drill holes improve marrow stimulation of articular cartilage defects. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42(11):2741–50.
Scillia AJ, et al. Return to play after chondroplasty of the lnee in National Football League Athletes. Am J Sports Med (2015): 0363546514562752.
Steadman JR et al. The microfracture technique in the treatment of full-thickness chondral lesions of the knee in National Football League players. J Knee Surg. 2003;16(2):83–6.
Steadman JR et al. Outcomes after knee microfracture of chondral defects in alpine ski racers. J Knee Surg. 2014;27(5):407–10.
Kaul G et al. Failed cartilage repair for early osteoarthritis defects: a biochemical, histological and immunohistochemical analysis of the repair tissue after treatment with marrow-stimulation techniques. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012;20(11):2315–24.
Orth P et al. Effect of subchondral drilling on the microarchitecture of subchondral bone analysis in a large animal model at 6 months. Am J Sports Med. 2012;40(4):828–36.
Dewan, Ashvin K, et al. Evolution of autologous chondrocyte repair and comparison to other cartilage repair techniques. BioMed Res Int 2014 (2014).
Nicolini AP et al. Updates in biological therapies for knee injuries: full thickness cartilage defect. Curr Revn Musculoskelet Med. 2014;7(3):256–62.
Knutsen G, Engebretsen L, Ludvigsen TC, Drogset JO, Grontvedt T, Solheim E, et al. Autologous chondrocyte implantation compared with microfracture in the knee. a randomized trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:455–64.
Knutsen G, Drogset JO, Engebretsen L, Grøntvedt T, Isaksen V, Ludvigsen TC, et al. A randomized trial comparing autologous chondrocyte implantation with microfracture. Findings at five years. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(10):2105–12.
Kon E, Gobbi A, Filardo G, Delcogliano M, Zaffagnini S, Marcacci M. Arthroscopic second-generation autologous chondrocyte implantation compared with microfracture for chondral lesions of the knee. Prospective nonrandomized study at 5 years. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37(1):33–41.
Chevrier A et al. Chitosan–glycerol phosphate/blood implants increase cell recruitment, transient vascularization and subchondral bone remodeling in drilled cartilage defects. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2007;15(3):316–27.
Chung, Young J, et al. Cartilage extra-cellular matrix biomembrane for the enhancement of microfractured defects. Knee Surg, Sports Traumatol, Arthrosc. 2014;22(6):1249–59.
Verdonk P et al. Treatment of osteochondral lesions in the knee using a cell-free scaffold. Bone Joint J. 2015;97(3):318–23.
Dai L., et al. One-step repair for cartilage defects in a rabbit model a technique combining the perforated decalcified cortical-cancellous bone matrix scaffold with microfracture. Am J sports Med (2014): 0363546513518415.
Stanish, William D, et al. Novel scaffold-based BST-CarGel treatment results in superior cartilage repair compared with microfracture in a randomized controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg. 2013;95(18):1640–50. Randomized controlled trial comparing scaffold versus microfracture alone.
Shive MS et al. BST-CarGel® Treatment Maintains Cartilage Repair Superiority over Microfracture at 5 Years in a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial. Cartilage. 2015;6(2):62–72. Midterm follow up comparing scaffolding versus microfacture alone.
Guzmán-Morales J et al. Subchondral chitosan/blood implant-guided bone plate resorption and woven bone repair is coupled to hyaline cartilage regeneration from microdrill holes in aged rabbit knees. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2014;22(2):323–33.
Lafantaisie-Favreau, Charles-Hubert, et al. Subchondral pre-solidified chitosan/blood implants elicit reproducible early osteochondral wound-repair responses including neutrophil and stromal cell chemotaxis, bone resorption and repair, enhanced repair tissue integration and delayed matrix deposition. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013;14(1):27.
Mathieu C et al. Stereological analysis of subchondral angiogenesis induced by chitosan and coagulation factors in microdrilled articular cartilage defects. Osteoarthritis Cartil. 2013;21(6):849–59.
Mascarenhas R et al. Role of platelet-rich plasma in articular cartilage injury and disease. J Knee Surg. 2014;28(01):003–10.
Krüger JP et al. Human platelet‐rich plasma stimulates migration and chondrogenic differentiation of human subchondral progenitor cells. J Orthop Res. 2012;30(6):845–52.
Siclari A et al. Cartilage repair in the knee with subchondral drilling augmented with a platelet-rich plasma-immersed polymer-based implant. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014;22(6):1225–34.
Siclari A et al. A 5-year follow-up after cartilage repair in the knee using a platelet-rich plasma-immersed polymer-based implant. Open Orthopaedics J. 2014;8:346. Midterm follow-up of microfracture with PRP technique.
Enea D et al. One-step cartilage repair in the knee: collagen-covered microfracture and autologous bone marrow concentrate. A pilot study. Knee. 2015;22(1):30–5.
Nam H et al. The effects of staged intra-articular injection of cultured autologous mesenchymal stromal cells on the repair of damaged cartilage: a pilot study in caprine model. Arthritis Res Ther. 2013;15(5):R129.
Hoffman JK, Geraghty S, Protzman NM. Articular cartilage repair using marrow stimulation augmented with a viable chondral allograft: 9-month postoperative histological evaluation. Case Rep Orthop 2015 (2015).
Osti L, Del Buono A , Maffulli N. Application of pulsed electromagnetic fields after microfractures to the knee: a mid-term study. Int Orthop (2015); 1–6.
Erggelet C. Enhanced marrow stimulation techniques for cartilage repair. Oper Tech Orthop. 2014;24(1):2–13. Overview of different marrow stimulation techniques.
Fazalare JA, Griesser MJ, Siston RA, Flanigan DC. The use of continuous passive motion following knee cartilage defect surgery: a systematic review. Orthopedics. 2010;33(12):878.
Karnes JM, Harris JD, Griesser MJ, Flanigan DC. Continuous passive motion following cartilage surgery: does a common protocol exist? Phys Sports Med. 2013;41(4):53–63.
Vogt S, Angele P, Arnold M, Brehme K, Cotic M, Haasper C, et al. Practice in rehabilitation after cartilage therapy: an expert survey. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2013;133(3):311–20.
Schmitt LC, Quatman CE, Paterno MV, Best TM, Flanigan DC. Functional outcomes after surgical management of articular cartilage lesions in the knee: a systematic literature review to guide postoperative rehabilitation. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2014;44(8):565–A10.
Moran CJ et al. Restoration of articular cartilage. J Bone Joint Surg. 2014;96(4):336–44.
McCormick F et al. Trends in the surgical treatment of articular cartilage lesions in the United States: an analysis of a large private-payer database over a period of 8 years.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Compliance with Ethics Guideline
ᅟ
Conflict of Interest
The authors have nothing to disclose.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors
Additional information
This article is part of the Topical Collection on Cartilage Repair Techniques in the Knee
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mirza, M.Z., Swenson, R.D. & Lynch, S.A. Knee cartilage defect: marrow stimulating techniques. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 8, 451–456 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-015-9303-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-015-9303-x