Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Prediction of Police Officer Performance Among New Mexico State Police as Assessed by the Personality Assessment Inventory

  • Published:
Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Little research has been conducted regarding the use of the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI) in law enforcement screening and selection. The limited body of research that does exist appears to support its utility in the selection process. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the validity and reliability of the Psychological Rating Risk Factor Statement (PRRFS) developed by Roberts, Thompson, and Johnson (2004) in predicting and discriminating problem from non-problem New Mexico State Police (NMSP) applicants. PAI profiles for each officer were obtained and transferred into the PAI Law Enforcement, Corrections, and Public Safety Selection software program, which generated probability estimates (PRRFS) to predict the likelihood that participants were not well-suited for a career in law enforcement. Subsequent logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) statistical analyses revealed that the PRRFS was ineffective in predicting and discriminating between problem and non-problem officers. Potential explanations for this finding are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aamodt MG (2004) Research in law enforcement selection. BrownWalker Press, Boca Raton, FL

    Google Scholar 

  • Abbot TE (1986) The MMPI R-S scale as an indicator of the future development of cynicism in police applicants. In: Reese JT, Goldstein HA (eds) Psychological services for law enforcement. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, pp. 3–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartol CR (1991) Predictive validation of the MMPI for small-town police officers who fail. Prof Psychol Res Pract 22:127–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blau TH, Super JT, Brady L (1993) The MMPI good cop/bad cop profile in identifying dysfunctional law enforcement personnel. J Police Crim Psychol 9:2–4

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewster J, Stoloff ML (1999) Using the good/bad cop profile with the MMPI-2. J Police Crim Psychol 14:29–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Caillouet BA, Rostow CD, Davis RD (2004) Law enforcement officer seniority and PAI variables in psychological fitness for duty examinations. J Police Crim Psychol 19:49–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Costello RM, Schneider SL, Schoenfeld LS, Kobos J (1982) Police applicant screening: An analogue study. J Clin Psychol 38:216–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottlieb MC, Baker CF (1974) Predicting police officer effectiveness. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Southwestern Psychological Association, El Paso, TX. May

  • Hiatt D, Hargrave GE (1988a) Predicting job performance problems with psychological screening. J Police Sci Adm 16:122–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinman LS, Gordon ME (1986) An examination of the relationship between police training academy performance and job performance. J Police Sci Adm 14:293–299

    Google Scholar 

  • Matyas GS (1980) The relationship of MMPI and biographical data to police selection and police performance. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Missouri, Columbia

  • Morey LC (1991) Personality assessment inventory: Professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources, Odessa, FL

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts MD (1997). The role of the PAI Law Enforcement, Corrections, and Public Safety Selection Report in the applicant screening process. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Chicago, IL, August

  • Roberts MD, Thompson JA, Johnson M (2004a) PAI Law Enforcement, Corrections, and Public Safety Selection Report: Manual. Psychological Assessment Resources, Odessa, FL

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts MD, Thompson JA, Johnson M (2004b) PAI Law Enforcement, Corrections, and Public Safety Selection Report: Software Program. Psychological Assessment Resources, Odessa, FL

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Census Bureau (2006) Retrieved August 6, 2007 from http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/35000.html

  • Weiss WU, Rostow C, Davis R, DeCoster-Martin E (2004) The personality assessment inventory as a selection device for law enforcement personnel. J Police Crim Psychol 19:23–29

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Veteran Affairs, Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Murfreesboro, TN, USA

    David W. Richardson

  2. Forensic Evaluation Team, Santa Fe, NM, USA

    Susan B. Cave

  3. New Mexico Highlands University, Las Vegas, NM, USA

    Linda La Grange

Authors
  1. David W. Richardson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Susan B. Cave
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Linda La Grange
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David W. Richardson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Richardson, D.W., Cave, S.B. & La Grange, L. Prediction of Police Officer Performance Among New Mexico State Police as Assessed by the Personality Assessment Inventory. J Police Crim Psych 22, 84–90 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-007-9010-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-007-9010-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation