Abstract
Using fMRI, we explored the relationship between phonological awareness (PA), a measure of metaphonological knowledge of the segmental structure of speech, and brain activation patterns during processing of print and speech in young readers from 6 to 10 years of age. Behavioral measures of PA were positively correlated with activation levels for print relative to speech tokens in superior temporal and occipito-temporal regions. Differences between print-elicited activation levels in superior temporal and inferior frontal sites were also correlated with PA measures with the direction of the correlation depending on stimulus type: positive for pronounceable pseudowords and negative for consonant strings. These results support and extend the many indications in the behavioral and neurocognitive literature that PA is a major component of skill in beginning readers and point to a developmental trajectory by which written language engages areas originally shaped by speech for learners on the path toward successful literacy acquisition.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Our interest in including the semantic mismatch condition is to address a longitudinal question about the relative influence of semantic and phonological processes over time and is therefore not examined in the context of this report focused on data acquired at entry into the study.
As shown in Tables 2 and 3, sites in STG show the same pattern of correlations. In the interest of brevity and simplicity, we selected just one of the sites for illustrating the pattern and for use in the multiple regression analyses described below.
Word Attack scores (mean raw score = 17.78; SD = 6.97; range 3–30) were not obtained for one of the participants; therefore these analyses only include data from 42 of the 43 participants.
Our approach was to examine the correlation between raw PA skill and functional activation. However, we did conduct multiple regression analyses with age as a predictor in order to ensure that the effects in the regions of interest we report were not accounted for or qualified by individual differences in age. We felt that this was particularly important for the analyses involving elision and blending given that studies have suggested that blending more accurately discriminates metaphonological skill in younger children, whereas and elision is a better discriminator in older children. Results of the analyses revealed no effect of age, and all of the effects for each region discussed remained significant.
References
Anthony, J. L., Williams, J. M., McDonald, R., & Francis, D. J. (2007). Phonological processing and emergent literacy in younger and older preschool children. Annals of Dyslexia, 57, 113–137. doi:10.1007/s11881-007-0008-8.
Ball, E. W., & Blachman, B. A. (1991). Does phoneme awareness training in kindergarten make a difference in early word recognition and developmental spelling? Reading Research Quarterly, 26, 49–66. doi:10.1598/RRQ.26.1.3.
Booth, J. R., Burman, D. D., Van Santen, F. W., Harasaki, Y., Gitelman, D. R., Parrish, T. B., & Mesulam, M. M. (2001). The development of specialized brain systems for reading and oral-language. Child Neuropsychology, 7, 119–141. doi:10.1076/chin.7.3.119.8740.
Bradley, L., & Bryant, P. E. (1983). Categorising sounds and learning to read—A causal connection. Nature, 301, 419–521. doi:10.1038/301419a0.
Brunswick, N., McCrory, E., Price, C., Frith, C. D., & Frith, U. (1999). Explicit and implicit processing of words and pseudowords by adult developmental dyslexics: A search for Wernicke’s Wortschatz? Brain, 122, 1901–1917. doi:10.1093/brain/122.10.1901.
Burton, M. W., Small, S. L., & Blumstein, S. E. (2000). The role of segmentation in phonological processing: an fMRI investigation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 679–690. doi:10.1162/089892900562309.
Castles, A., & Coltheart, M. (2004). Is there a causal link from phonological awareness to success in learning to read? Cognition, 91, 77–111. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(03)00164-1.
Castro-Caldas, A., Petersson, K. M., Reis, A., Stone-Elander, S., & Ingvar, M. (1998). The illiterate brain. Learning to read and write during childhood influences the functional organization of the adult brain. Brain, 121, 1053–1063. doi:10.1093/brain/121.6.1053.
Chee, M., O’Craven, K. M., Bergida, R., Rosen, B. R., & Savoy, R. L. (1999). Auditory and visual word processing studies with fMRI. Human Brain Mapping, 7, 15–28. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0193(1999)7:1<15::AID-HBM2>3.0.CO;2-6.
Dunn, L., & Dunn, L. (1997). Peabody picture vocabulary test: Third edition. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
Fiez, J. A., & Peterson, S. E. (1998). Neuroimaging studies of word reading. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 95, 914–921. doi:10.1073/pnas.95.3.914.
Foorman, B. R., Francis, D., Fletcher, J. K., Schatschneider, C., & Mehta, P. (1998). The role of instruction in learning to reading: preventing reading failure in at-risk children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 37–55. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.90.1.37.
Friston, K. J., Ashburner, J., Frith, C. D., Poline, J.-B., Heather, J. D., & Frackowiak, R. S. J. (1995). Spatial registration and normalization of images. Human Brain Mapping, 2, 165–189.
Frost, S. J., Mencl, W. E., Sandak, R., Moore, D. L., Rueckl, J., Katz, L., Fulbright, R. K., & Pugh, K. R. (2005). An fMRI study of the trade-off between semantics and phonology in reading aloud. Neuroreport, 16, 621–624. doi:10.1097/00001756-200504250-00021.
Genovese, C. R., Lazar, N. A., & Nichols, T. (2002). Thresholding of statistical maps in functional neuroimaging using the false discovery rate. NeuroImage, 15, 870–878. doi:10.1006/nimg.2001.1037.
Goswami, U., & Bryant, P. (1990). Phonological skills and learning to read. London: Erlbaum.
Hadjikhani, N., & Roland, P. E. (1998). Cross-modal transfer of information between the tactile and the visual representations in the human brain: A positron emission tomographic study. The Journal of Neuroscience, 18, 1072–1084.
Hillis, A. E., Newhart, M., Heidler, J., Barker, P., Herskovits, E., & Degaonkar, M. (2005). The roles of the “visual word form area” in reading. NeuroImage, 24, 548–599. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.08.026.
Hoeft, F., Meyler, A., Hernandez, A., Juel, C., Taylor-Hill, H., Martindale, J. L., McMillon, G., Kolchugina, G., Black, J. M., Faizi, A., Deutsch, G. K., Siok, W. T., Reiss, A. L., Whitfield-Gabrieli, S., & Gabrieli, J. D. E. (2007). Functional and morphometric brain dissociation between dyslexia and reading ability. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104, 4234–4239. doi:10.1073/pnas.0609399104.
Katzir, T., Misra, M., & Poldrack, R. A. (2005). Imaging phonology without print: Assessing the neural correlates of phonemic awareness using fMRI. NeuroImage, 27, 106–115. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.04.013.
Kirk, R. E. (1982). Experimental design: Procedures for the social sciences. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Miezin, F. M., Maccotta, L., Ollinger, J. M., Petersen, S. E., & Buckner, R. L. (2000). Characterizing the hemodynamic response: Effects of presentation rate, sampling procedure, and the possibility of ordering brain activity based on relative timing. NeuroImage, 11, 735–759. doi:10.1006/nimg.2000.0568.
Morais, J. (1993). Reading disabilities: Diagnosis and component processes. In R. M. Joshi, & C. K. Leong (Eds.), (pp. 175–184). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
Papademetris, X., Jackowski, A. P., Schultz, R. T., Staib, L. H., & Duncan, J. S. (2003). Computing 3D non-rigid brain registrations using extended robust point matching for composite multisubject fMRI analysis. In R. E. Ellis, & T. M. Peters (Eds.), Medical image computing and computer assisted intervention (pp. 788–795). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Paulesu, E., Demonet, J. -F., Fazio, F., McCrory, E., Chanoine, V., Brunswick, N., Cappa, S. F., Cossu, G., Habib, M., Frith, C. D., & Frith, U. (2001). Dyslexia: Cultural diversity and biological unity. Science, 291, 2165–2167. doi:10.1126/science.1057179.
Perfetti, C. A., Beck, I., Bell, L. C., & Hughes, C. (1987). Phonemic knowledge and learning to read are reciprocal: A longitudinal study of first grade children. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 33, 283–319.
Petersson, K. M., Silva, C., Castro-Caldas, A., Ingvar, M., & Reis, A. (2007). Literacy: a cultural influence on functional left-right differences in the inferior parietal cortex. The European Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 791–799. doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2007.05701.x.
Poldrack, R. A., Wagner, A. D., Prull, M. W., Desmond, J. E., Glover, G. H., & Gabrieli, J. D. (1999). Functional specialization for semantic and phonological processing in the left inferior prefrontal cortex. NeuroImage, 10, 15–35. doi:10.1006/nimg.1999.0441.
Psychological Corporation. (1999). Wechsler abbreviated scale of intelligence. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
Pugh, K. R., Shaywitz, B. A., Shaywitz, S. E., Constable, T. R., Skudlarski, P., Fulbright, R. K., Bronen, R. A., Shankweiler, D. P., Katz, L., Fletcher, J. M., & Gore, J. C. (1996). Cerebral organization of component processes in reading. Brain, 119, 1221–1238. doi:10.1093/brain/119.4.1221.
Pugh, K. R., Shaywitz, B. A., Shaywitz, S. E., Shankweiler, D. P., Katz, L., Fletcher, J. M., Skudlarski, P., Fulbright, R. K., Constable, R. T., Bronen, R. A., Lacadie, C., & Gore, J. C. (1997). Predicting reading performance from neuroimaging profiles: The cerebral basis of phonological effects in printed word identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 23(2), 299–318. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.23.2.299.
Rumsey, J. M., Nace, K., Donohue, B., Wise, D., Maisog, J. M., & Andreason, P. (1997). A positron emission tomographic study of impaired word recognition and phonological processing in dyslexic men. Archives of Neurology, 54, 562–573.
Salmelin, R., Service, E., Kiesila, P., Uutela, K., & Salonen, O. (1996). Impaired visual word processing in dyslexia revealed with magnetoencephalography. Annals of Neurology, 40, 157–162. doi:10.1002/ana.410400206.
Scarborough, H. S. (1998). Early identification of children at risk for disabilities: Phonological awareness and some other promising predictors. In B. K. Shapiro, P. J. Accardo, & A. J. Capute (Eds.), Specific reading disability: A view of the spectrum (pp. 75–119). Timonium, MD: York Press.
Schatschneider, C., Francis, D. J., Foorman, B. R., Fletcher, J. M., & Mehta, P. (1999). The dimensionality of phonological awareness: an application of item response theory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 439–449. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.91.3.439.
Shaywitz, S. E., Shaywitz, B. A., Pugh, K. R., Fulbright, R. K., Constable, R. T., Mencl, W. E., Shankweiler, D. P., Liberman, A. M., Skudlarski, P., Fletcher, J. M., Katz, L., Marchione, K. E., Lacadie, C., Gatenby, C., & Gore, J. C. (1998). Functional disruption in the organization of the brain for reading in dyslexia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 95, 2636–2641. doi:10.1073/pnas.95.5.2636.
Shaywitz, B. A., Shaywitz, S. E., Pugh, K. R., Mencl, W. E., Fullbright, R. K., Skudlarski, P., Constable, R. T., Marchione, K. E., Fletcher, J. M., Lyon, G. R., & Gore, J. C. (2002). Disruption of posterior brain systems for reading in children with developmental dyslexia. Biological Psychiatry, 52, 101–110. doi:10.1016/S0006-3223(02)01365-3.
Shaywitz, B. A., Shaywitz, S. E., Blachman, B., Pugh, K., Fulbright, R., Skudlarski, P., et al. (2004). Development of left occipito-temporal systems for skilled reading in children after a phonologically-based intervention. Biological Psychiatry, 55, 926–933. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2003.12.019.
Simos, P. G., Fletcher, J. M., Bergman, E., Breier, J. I., Foorman, B. R., Castillo, E. M., Davis, R. N., Fitzgerald, M., & Papanicolaou, A. C. (2002). Dyslexia—specific brain activation profile becomes normal following successful remedial training. Neurology, 58, 1203–1213.
Stanovich, K. E., & Siegel, L. S. (1994). Phenotypic performance profile of children with reading disabilities: A regression-based test of the phonological-core variable-difference model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 24–53. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.86.1.24.
Stanovich, K. E., Cunningham, A. E., & Cramer, B. B. (1984). Assessing phonological awareness in kindergarten children: issues of task comparability. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 38, 175–190. doi:10.1016/0022-0965(84)90120-6.
Temple, E., Deutsch, G. K., Poldrack, R. A., Miller, S. L., Tallal, P., Merzenich, M. M., & Gabrieli, J. D. E. (2003). Neural deficits in children with dyslexia ameliorated by behavioral remediation: Evidence from functional MRI. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 100, 2860–2865. doi:10.1073/pnas.0030098100.
Torgesen, J. K., Morgan, S. T., & Davis, C. (1992). Effects of two types of phonological awareness training on word learning in kindergarten children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 364–370. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.84.3.364.
Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1999). Test of word reading efficiency (TOWRE). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., Rashotte, C. A., Rose, E., Lindamood, P., Conway, T., & Garvan, C. (1999). Preventing reading failure in young children with phonological processing disabilities: Group and individual responses to instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(4), 579–593. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.91.4.579.
Turkeltaub, P. E., Gareau, L., Flowers, D. L., Zeffiro, T. A., & Eden, G. F. (2003). Development of neural mechanisms for reading. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 767–773. doi:10.1038/nn1065.
Vloedgraven, J. M. T., & Verhoeven, L. (2007). Screening of phonological awareness in the early elementary grades: an IRT approach. Annals of Dyslexia, 57, 33–50.
Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1994). Development of reading-related phonological processing abilities: New evidence of bi-directional causality from a latent variable longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 30, 73–87. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.30.1.73.
Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1999). Comprehensive test of phonological processing. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
Wise, B. W., & Olson, R. K. (1995). Computer-based phonological awareness and reading instruction. Annals of Dyslexia, 45, 99–122. doi:10.1007/BF02648214.
Woodcock, R. W., McGrew, K. S., & Mather, N. (2001). Woodcock-Johnson III tests of cognitive abilities. Itasca, IL: Riverside.
Ziegler, J. C., & Goswami, U. (2005). Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia, and skilled reading across languages: a psycholinguistic grain size theory. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 3–29. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.131.1.3.
Acknowledgments
This study is supported by National Institute of Child Health and Human Development grant HD 01994 to Carol Fowler (Haskins Laboratories) and NICHD grant HD 048830 to Kenneth R. Pugh (Yale University). We thank Gina DellaPorta, Kelley Delaney, and Ashley Zennis, for behavioral assessment and Hedy Serofin and Teri Hickey for help with imaging participants.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Frost, S.J., Landi, N., Mencl, W.E. et al. Phonological awareness predicts activation patterns for print and speech. Ann. of Dyslexia 59, 78–97 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-009-0024-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-009-0024-y