Abstract
The research reported in this paper examined spoken mathematics in particular well-taught classrooms in Australia, China (both Shanghai and Hong Kong), Japan, Korea and the USA from the perspective of the distribution of responsibility for knowledge generation in order to identify similarities and differences in classroom practice and the implicit pedagogical principles that underlie those practices. The methodology of the Learner’s Perspective Study documented the voicing of mathematical ideas in public discussion and in teacher–student conversations and the relative priority accorded by different teachers to student oral contributions to classroom activity. Significant differences were identified among the classrooms studied, challenging simplistic characterisations of ‘the Asian classroom’ as enacting a single pedagogy, and suggesting that, irrespective of cultural similarities, local pedagogies reflect very different assumptions about learning and instruction. We have employed spoken mathematical terms as a form of surrogate variable, possibly indicative of the location of the agency for knowledge generation in the various classrooms studied (but also of interest in itself). The analysis distinguished one classroom from another on the basis of “public oral interactivity” (the number of utterances in whole class and teacher–student interactions in each lesson) and “mathematical orality” (the frequency of occurrence of key mathematical terms in each lesson). Classrooms characterized by high public oral interactivity were not necessarily sites of high mathematical orality. In particular, the results suggest that one characteristic that might be identified with a national norm of practice could be the level of mathematical orality: relatively high mathematical orality characterising the mathematics classes in Shanghai with some consistency, while lessons studied in Seoul and Hong Kong consistently involved much less frequent spoken mathematical terms. The relative contributions of teacher and students to this spoken mathematics provided an indication of how the responsibility for knowledge generation was shared between teacher and student in those classrooms. Specific analysis of the patterns of interaction by which key mathematical terms were introduced or solicited revealed significant differences. It is suggested that the empirical investigation of mathematical orality and its likely connection to the distribution of the responsibility for knowledge generation and to student learning ourcomes are central to the development of any theory of mathematics instruction and learning.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bakhtin, M. (1979). The aesthetics of verbal creation. Moscow: Bocharov. Cited in Todarov, T. (1984). Mikhail Bakhtin: The dialogical principle. Translated by Wlad Godzich. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.
Beaton, A. E., & Robitaille, D. F. (1999). An overview of the third international mathematics and science study. In G. Kaiser, E. Luna & I. Huntley (Eds.), International comparisons in mathematics education (pp. 19–29). London: Falmer Press.
Clarke, D. J. (2003). International comparative studies in mathematics education. In A. J. Bishop, M. A. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick & F. K. S. Leung (Eds.), Second international handbook of mathematics education (pp. 145–186). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Clarke, D. J. (2006a). The LPS research design. In D. J. Clarke, C. Keitel & Y. Shimizu (Eds.), Mathematics classrooms in twelve countries: The insider’s perspective (pp. 15–37). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Clarke, D. J. (2006b). The learner’s perspective study. In D. J. Clarke, C. Keitel, Y. & Shimizu (Eds.), Mathematics classrooms in twelve countries: The insider’s perspective (pp. 1–14). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Clarke, D. J. (2006c). Using international comparative research to contest prevalent oppositional dichotomies. Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik, 38(5), 376–387.
Clarke, D. J., Emanuelsson, J., Jablonka, E., & Mok, I. A. C. (Eds.). (2006a). Making connections: Comparing mathematics classrooms around the world. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Clarke, D. J., Keitel, C., & Shimizu, Y. (Eds.). (2006b). Mathematics classrooms in twelve countries: The insider’s perspective. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Clarke, D. J. & Seah, L. H. (2005). Studying the distribution of responsibility for the generation of knowledge in mathematics classrooms. In Chick, H. L. & Vincent, J. L. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (Vol. 2, pp. 257–264).
Hiebert, J., Gallimore, R., Garnier, H., Givvin, K., Hollingsworth, H., Jacobs, J., et al. (2003). Teaching mathematics in seven countries: Results from the TIMSS 1999 video study. Washington, DC: US Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
Huang, R., & Leung, F. K. S. (2004). Cracking the paradox of Chinese learners: Looking into the mathematics classrooms in Hong Kong and Shanghai. In l l. Fan, N.-Y. Wong, J. Cai & S. Li (Eds.), How Chinese learn mathematics: Perspectives from Insiders (pp. 348–381). New Jersey: World Scientific.
Lopez-Real, F., Mok, I. A. C., Leung, F. K. S., & Marton, F. (2004). Identifying a pattern of teaching: An analysis of a Shanghai teacher’s lessons. In l Fan, N.-Y. Wong, J. Cai & S. Li (Eds.), How Chinese learn mathematics: Perspectives from Insiders (pp. 382–412). New Jersey: World Scientific.
Mok, I. A. C. (2006). Teacher-dominating lessons in Shanghai: The insiders’ story. In D. J. Clarke, C. Keitel & Y. Shimizu (Eds.), Mathematics classrooms in twelve countries: The insider’s perspective (pp. 87–98). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Mok, I. A. C., & Morris, P. (2001). The metamorphosis of the ‘Virtuoso’: Pedagogic patterns in Hong Kong primary mathematics classrooms. Teaching and Teacher Education: An International Journal of Research and Studies, 17(4), 455–468.
O’Keefe, C., Xu, L. H., & Clarke, D.J. (2006). Kikan-Shido: between desks instruction. In D.J. Clarke, J. Emanuelsson, E. Jablonka, & I.A.H. Mok (Eds.). Making connections: Comparing mathematics classrooms around the world (Chap 4, pp. 73–106). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Stigler, J., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Wang, J., & Lin, E. (2005). Comparative studies on U.S. and Chinese mathematics learning and the implications for standards-based mathematics teaching reform. Educ Res, 34(5), 3–13.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Clarke, D., Xu, L.H. Distinguishing between mathematics classrooms in Australia, China, Japan, Korea and the USA through the lens of the distribution of responsibility for knowledge generation: public oral interactivity and mathematical orality. ZDM Mathematics Education 40, 963–972 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-008-0129-5
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-008-0129-5