Skip to main content
Log in

Immersion vs. percolation in the extraction of oil from oleaginous seeds

  • Published:
Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society

Abstract

The influence of the two contact modes, percolation and immersion, during the extraction of oilseeds by means of a solvent are presented. Experiments were performed in lab-scale equipment with soybean flakes, arranged in beds that reproduce these two contact modes. The extractions were carried out with hexane at constant temperature. To simulate the performance of shallow-and deep-bed extractors, two different bed height/diameter ratios were used. The experimental results are explained in terms of the basic transfer phenomena that occur during extraction. These phenomena are addressed to develop a mathematical model, which is used to simulate extraction under both contact modes. The immersion scheme yielded greater efficiency than the percolation mode to extract soybean flakes for the two bed height/diameter ratios studied. The mathematical model predicts very well the experimental findings. It also predicts the solvent retained by the solid mass after extracting the oil.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lajara, J., Solvent Extraction of Oil from Oilsseds: The Real Basics, in Proceedings of the World Conference on Edible Fats and Oils Processing, AOCS Press, Champaign, 1989, pp. 49–55.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Christensen, P., Solvent Extraction: Recent Developments, J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 60:166–167 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Prabhudesai, R., Leaching, in Handbook of Separation Techniques for Chemical Engineers, edited by P. Schweitzer, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1997, pp. 5.3–5.31.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Pavlik, R., and T. Kemper, Benefits in Utilizing the Extruder, inform 3:201–204 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kemper, T., Extraction Principles and Extractor Design, in Technology and Solvents for Extracting Oilseeds and Nonpetroleum Oils, edited by P. Wan and P. Wakelyn, AOCS Press, Champaign, 1997, pp. 137–141.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Rice, R., Approximate Solutions for Batch, Packed Tube and Radial Flow Adsorbers, Chem. Eng. Sci. 37:83–91 (1982).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Crank, J., The Mathematics of Diffusion, Oxford University Press, London, 1970, pp. 52–91.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Desai, M., and H. Schwartzberg, Mathematical Modeling of Leaching Processes, in Food Processing Systems, edited by P. Linko, Y. Malkki, J. Olkku, and J. Larnikari, Applied Science Press, London, 1980, pp. 86–91.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Flores de Hoyos, S., and H. Schwartzberg, Modeling of Counterucurrent, Crossflow, Solid-Liquid Extractors and Experimental Verification, in Food Engineering and Process Application, edited by L. Maguer and J. Jelen, Elsevier Applied Science, Essex, 1987, pp. 413–421.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Majumdar, G., A. Samanta, and S. Sengupta, Modeling Solvent Extraction of Vegetable Oil in a Packed Bed, J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 72:971–974 (1995).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Pramparo, M., M. Martinello, and M. Mattea, Design and Simulation of a Continuous Extractor, in Proceeding of ler. Congreso de Ingeniería de Procesos del Mercosur, Sapienza Impresiones, Bahía Blanca, Argentina, 1997, pp. 127–128.

  12. Karnofsky, G., Design of Oilseed Extractors, J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 63:1011–1014 (1986).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Zeitsch, K., Centrifugal Filtration, in Solid-Liquid Separation, edited by L. Svarovsky, Butterworth, London, 1990, pp. 476–532.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Constantinides, A., and N. Mostoufi, Numerical Methods for Chemical Engineers with MatLab Applications, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Reid, R., J. Prausnitz, and B. Poling, The Properties of Gases and Liquids, 4th edn., McGraw-Hill, New York, 1987, pp. 388–656.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Adamson, A., Physical Chemistry of Surfaces, 4th edn., John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1982, pp. 4–49.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sherwood, T., R. Pigford, and C. Wilke, Mass Transfer, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1975, pp. 9–157.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kärger, J., and Y. Ruthven, Diffusion in Zeolites and other Microporous Solids, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1992, pp. 232–245.

    Google Scholar 

  19. American Oil Chemists' Society, Official and Recommended Practices of the American Oil Chemists' Society, 4th edn., AOCS Press, Champaign, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lozano, J., E. Rotstein, and M. Urbicain, Total Porosity and Open-pore Porosity in the Dyring of Fruits, J. Food Sci. 45:1403–1407 (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Montgomery, D., Design and Analysis of Experiments, 3rd edn., John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1991, pp. 38–42.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Pramparo.

About this article

Cite this article

Pramparo, M., Gregory, S. & Mattea, M. Immersion vs. percolation in the extraction of oil from oleaginous seeds. J Amer Oil Chem Soc 79, 955–960 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11746-002-0586-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11746-002-0586-3

Key words

Navigation