Abstract
Background
Access port problems after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding can be significant complications. The Easyband™ is an innovative type of gastric band, whose internal diameter can be adjusted by a telemetrically activated motor. The aim of this study was to evaluate safety, efficacy and performance of the Easyband™.
Methods
A total of 110 morbidly obese patients were prospectively enrolled. The Easyband™ was implanted laparoscopically by experienced bariatric surgeons in six different hospital locations. Patient characteristics, surgery details, postoperative weight loss, and complications were recorded. Follow-up lasted 2 years.
Results
Follow-up was completed by 78.2 % of the patients. Surgeons rated 71 % of each aspect of Easyband™ implantation as “easy” or “very easy”. Adjustments were successful in 91 % of the attempts. One or more adverse events occurred in 79.1 % of the patients. Thirty-six serious adverse events were reported, of which 50 % was device-related. One or more functional tests failed in 20.9 % of the devices, 8.2 % passed after a repeated test. A reintervention was necessary in 15.5 % of the patients. Mean weight loss after 2 years was 24.2 ± 14.0 kg, mean excess weight loss was 46.1 ± 24 %.
Conclusion
Excess weight loss with the Easyband™ was comparable with other gastric banding devices. Adjustment of the device was simple, non-invasive and more acceptable to patients than with a standard access port. However, a high incidence of device-related problems requiring surgical explantation occurred. The Easyband™ represents a major advance in gastric band design, but significant technical problems need to be resolved before further implants can be recommended.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Launay-Savary MV, Slim K, Brugere C, Buc E, Nini E, Forestier D, et al. Band and port-related morbidity after bariatric surgery: an underestimated problem. Obes Surg. 2008;18:1406–10.
Keidar A, Carmon E, Szold A, Abu-Abeid S. Port complications following laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding for morbid obesity. Obes Surg. 2005;15:361–5.
Lattuada E, Zappa MA, Mozzi E, Antonini I, Boati P, Roviaro GC. Injection port and connecting tube complications after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. Obes Surg. 2010;20:410–4.
Susmallian S, Ezri T, Elis M, Charuzi I. Access-port complications after laparoscopic gastric banding. Obes Surg. 2003;13:128–31.
World Health Organization. Obesity and overweight Fact sheet N°311. 2014. Ref Type: Online Source
Weiner RA, Korenkov M, Matzig E, Weiner S, Karcz WK, Junginger T. Early results with a new telemetrically adjustable gastric banding. Obes Surg. 2007;17:717–21.
NIH conference. Gastrointestinal surgery for severe obesity. Consensus Development Conference Panel. Ann Intern Med; 115:956–61;1991
Fielding GA, Allen JW. A step-by-step guide to placement of the LAP-BAND adjustable gastric banding system. Am J Surg. 2002;184:26S–30S.
Weiner RA, Korenkov M, Matzig E, Weiner S, Karcz WK. Initial clinical experience with telemetrically adjustable gastric banding. Surg Technol Int. 2006;15:63–9.
Garb J, Welch G, Zagarins S, Kuhn J, Romanelli J. Bariatric surgery for the treatment of morbid obesity: a meta-analysis of weight loss outcomes for laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding and laparoscopic gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2009;19:1447–55.
Busetto L, Segato G, De MF, Foletto M, De LM, Caniato D, et al. Outcome predictors in morbidly obese recipients of an adjustable gastric band. Obes Surg. 2002;12:83–92.
Angrisani L, Furbetta F, Doldi SB, Basso N, Lucchese M, Giacomelli F, et al. Lap Band adjustable gastric banding system: the Italian experience with 1863 patients operated on 6 years. Surg Endosc. 2003;17:409–12.
van Wageningen B, Aarts EO, Janssen IM, Berends FJ. Access-port fixation on the left pectoral fascia in laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. Obes Surg. 2011;21:386–90.
Wellborn Jr JC, Wellborn SH, Wellborn T. Technique for nonfascial fixation of the laparoscopic adjustable gastric band access port. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2010;6:429–33.
Miller KA, Pump A. Mechanical versus suture fixation of the port in adjustable gastric banding procedures: a prospective randomized blinded study. Surg Endosc. 2008;22:2478–84.
Fabry H, Van HR, Hendrickx L, Totte E. A technique for prevention of port complications after laparoscopic adjustable silicone gastric banding. Obes Surg. 2002;12:285–8.
Cunneen SA. Review of meta-analytic comparisons of bariatric surgery with a focus on laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2008;4:S47–55.
Weiner R, Blanco-Engert R, Weiner S, Matkowitz R, Schaefer L, Pomhoff I. Outcome after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding - 8 years experience. Obes Surg. 2003;13:427–34.
Acknowledgments
We thank Jean Closset and Marc Focquet for their valuable contribution to this study and Allergan for providing the Easyband™.
Conflict of Interest
Dr. Greve and Dr. Meesters report grants from Allergan, during the conduct of the study; Dr. Segato and Dr. Favretti report grants from Allergan Company, outside the submitted work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Handgraaf, H.J.M., Ashton, D., Favretti, F. et al. The Gastric Band That Is Not to Be. OBES SURG 25, 2239–2244 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-015-1704-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-015-1704-9