Skip to main content
Log in

The Gastric Band That Is Not to Be

Efficacy, Safety and Performance of the Easyband™: a Multicenter Experience

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Access port problems after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding can be significant complications. The Easyband™ is an innovative type of gastric band, whose internal diameter can be adjusted by a telemetrically activated motor. The aim of this study was to evaluate safety, efficacy and performance of the Easyband™.

Methods

A total of 110 morbidly obese patients were prospectively enrolled. The Easyband™ was implanted laparoscopically by experienced bariatric surgeons in six different hospital locations. Patient characteristics, surgery details, postoperative weight loss, and complications were recorded. Follow-up lasted 2 years.

Results

Follow-up was completed by 78.2 % of the patients. Surgeons rated 71 % of each aspect of Easyband™ implantation as “easy” or “very easy”. Adjustments were successful in 91 % of the attempts. One or more adverse events occurred in 79.1 % of the patients. Thirty-six serious adverse events were reported, of which 50 % was device-related. One or more functional tests failed in 20.9 % of the devices, 8.2 % passed after a repeated test. A reintervention was necessary in 15.5 % of the patients. Mean weight loss after 2 years was 24.2 ± 14.0 kg, mean excess weight loss was 46.1 ± 24 %.

Conclusion

Excess weight loss with the Easyband™ was comparable with other gastric banding devices. Adjustment of the device was simple, non-invasive and more acceptable to patients than with a standard access port. However, a high incidence of device-related problems requiring surgical explantation occurred. The Easyband™ represents a major advance in gastric band design, but significant technical problems need to be resolved before further implants can be recommended.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Launay-Savary MV, Slim K, Brugere C, Buc E, Nini E, Forestier D, et al. Band and port-related morbidity after bariatric surgery: an underestimated problem. Obes Surg. 2008;18:1406–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Keidar A, Carmon E, Szold A, Abu-Abeid S. Port complications following laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding for morbid obesity. Obes Surg. 2005;15:361–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lattuada E, Zappa MA, Mozzi E, Antonini I, Boati P, Roviaro GC. Injection port and connecting tube complications after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. Obes Surg. 2010;20:410–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Susmallian S, Ezri T, Elis M, Charuzi I. Access-port complications after laparoscopic gastric banding. Obes Surg. 2003;13:128–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. World Health Organization. Obesity and overweight Fact sheet N°311. 2014. Ref Type: Online Source

  6. Weiner RA, Korenkov M, Matzig E, Weiner S, Karcz WK, Junginger T. Early results with a new telemetrically adjustable gastric banding. Obes Surg. 2007;17:717–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. NIH conference. Gastrointestinal surgery for severe obesity. Consensus Development Conference Panel. Ann Intern Med; 115:956–61;1991

  8. Fielding GA, Allen JW. A step-by-step guide to placement of the LAP-BAND adjustable gastric banding system. Am J Surg. 2002;184:26S–30S.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Weiner RA, Korenkov M, Matzig E, Weiner S, Karcz WK. Initial clinical experience with telemetrically adjustable gastric banding. Surg Technol Int. 2006;15:63–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Garb J, Welch G, Zagarins S, Kuhn J, Romanelli J. Bariatric surgery for the treatment of morbid obesity: a meta-analysis of weight loss outcomes for laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding and laparoscopic gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2009;19:1447–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Busetto L, Segato G, De MF, Foletto M, De LM, Caniato D, et al. Outcome predictors in morbidly obese recipients of an adjustable gastric band. Obes Surg. 2002;12:83–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Angrisani L, Furbetta F, Doldi SB, Basso N, Lucchese M, Giacomelli F, et al. Lap Band adjustable gastric banding system: the Italian experience with 1863 patients operated on 6 years. Surg Endosc. 2003;17:409–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. van Wageningen B, Aarts EO, Janssen IM, Berends FJ. Access-port fixation on the left pectoral fascia in laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. Obes Surg. 2011;21:386–90.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wellborn Jr JC, Wellborn SH, Wellborn T. Technique for nonfascial fixation of the laparoscopic adjustable gastric band access port. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2010;6:429–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Miller KA, Pump A. Mechanical versus suture fixation of the port in adjustable gastric banding procedures: a prospective randomized blinded study. Surg Endosc. 2008;22:2478–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Fabry H, Van HR, Hendrickx L, Totte E. A technique for prevention of port complications after laparoscopic adjustable silicone gastric banding. Obes Surg. 2002;12:285–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Cunneen SA. Review of meta-analytic comparisons of bariatric surgery with a focus on laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2008;4:S47–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Weiner R, Blanco-Engert R, Weiner S, Matkowitz R, Schaefer L, Pomhoff I. Outcome after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding - 8 years experience. Obes Surg. 2003;13:427–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Jean Closset and Marc Focquet for their valuable contribution to this study and Allergan for providing the Easyband™.

Conflict of Interest

Dr. Greve and Dr. Meesters report grants from Allergan, during the conduct of the study; Dr. Segato and Dr. Favretti report grants from Allergan Company, outside the submitted work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jan Willem M. Greve.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Handgraaf, H.J.M., Ashton, D., Favretti, F. et al. The Gastric Band That Is Not to Be. OBES SURG 25, 2239–2244 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-015-1704-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-015-1704-9

Keywords

Navigation