Abstract
Background
The motility of the upper gut after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) is underexplored. We aimed to investigate the oesophago-gastro-Roux limb motor activity during fasting and after food intake.
Methods
Eighteen morbidly obese patients were examined at least 2 years after RYGBP. A high-resolution manometry catheter was positioned to straddle the oesophagogastric junction, the gastric pouch and the proximal Roux limb using transmucosal potential difference measurements. Three patients with vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG) were also studied.
Results
During the fasting state, the gastric pouch had low or no activity whereas the Roux limb exhibited regular migrating motility complexes (MMCs) being initiated just distal to gastroenteroanastomosis. Median cycle duration was 72 min, and the median propagating velocity of the phase III MMC phase was 2.7 cm/min (n = 8). When patients were asked to eat until they felt comfortably full, intraluminal pressure increased by 6 to 8 cmH2O without any significant difference between gastric pouch and the Roux limb (n = 9). The increased intraluminal pressure following food intake correlated neither to weight loss nor to meal size or rate of eating.
Conclusions
A successful RYGBP is associated with MMC in the Roux limb during fasting. The gastric pouch and the Roux limb behaved as a common cavity during food ingestion. Data do not support the hypothesis that the alimentary limb pressure in response to food intake influences either meal size or weight loss.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
WHO. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs311/en/). Downloaded October 2014.
Sjostrom L. Review of the key results from the Swedish Obese Subjects (SOS) trial—a prospective controlled intervention study of bariatric surgery. J Intern Med. 2013;273(3):219–34. doi:10.1111/joim.12012.
Werling M, Olbers T, Fandriks L, et al. Increased postprandial energy expenditure may explain superior long term weight loss after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass compared to vertical banded gastroplasty. PLoS One. 2013;8(4):e60280. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0060280.
Horner KM, Byrne NM, Cleghorn GJ, et al. The effects of weight loss strategies on gastric emptying and appetite control. Obes Rev Offic J Int Assoc Stud Obes. 2011;12(11):935–51. doi:10.1111/j.1467-789X.2011.00901.x.
Bjorklund P, Laurenius A, Een E, et al. Is the Roux limb a determinant for meal size after gastric bypass surgery? Obes Surg. 2010;20(10):1408–14. doi:10.1007/s11695-010-0192-1.
Ardila-Hani A, Soffer EE. Review article: the impact of bariatric surgery on gastrointestinal motility. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2011;34(8):825–31. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2036.2011.04812.x.
Mathias JR, Khanna R, Nealon WH, et al. Roux-limb motility after total gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y anastomosis in patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. Dig Dis Sci. 1992;37(4):545–50.
Miedema BW, Kelly KA, Camilleri M, et al. Human gastric and jejunal transit and motility after Roux gastrojejunostomy. Gastroenterology. 1992;103(4):1133–43.
van der Mijle HC, Kleibeuker JH, Limburg AJ, et al. Manometric and scintigraphic studies of the relation between motility disturbances in the Roux limb and the Roux-en-Y syndrome. Am J Surg. 1993;166(1):11–7.
Tu BN, Kelly KA. Motility disorders after Roux-en-Y Gastrojejunostomy. Obes Surg. 1994;4(3):219–26.
Herbella FA, Silva LC, Vicentine FP, et al. Roux-en-Y limb motility after total gastrectomy. J Gastro Surg Offic J Soc Surg Aliment Tract. 2014;18(5):906–10. doi:10.1007/s11605-014-2473-9.
Lonroth H, Dalenback J, Haglind E, et al. Laparoscopic gastric bypass. Another option in bariatric surgery. Surg Endosc. 1996;10(6):636–8.
Olbers T, Lonroth H, Fagevik-Olsen M, et al. Laparoscopic gastric bypass: development of technique, respiratory function, and long-term outcome. Obes Surg. 2003;13(3):364–70. doi:10.1381/096089203765887679.
Casselbrant A, Edebo A, Wennerblom J, et al. Actions by angiotensin II on esophageal contractility in humans. Gastroenterology. 2007;132(1):249–60. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2006.11.010.
Mellander A, Jarbur K, Sjovall H. Pressure and frequency dependent linkage between motility and epithelial secretion in human proximal small intestine. Gut. 2000;46(3):376–84.
Husebye E. The patterns of small bowel motility: physiology and implications in organic disease and functional disorders. Neurogastro Motilit Offic J Eur Gastroint Motilit Soc. 1999;11(3):141–61.
Pandolfino JE, Ghosh SK, Rice J, et al. Classifying esophageal motility by pressure topography characteristics: a study of 400 patients and 75 controls. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;103(1):27–37. doi:10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01532.x.
Hershcovici T, Mashimo H, Fass R. The lower esophageal sphincter. Neurogastro Motilit Offic J Eur Gastroint Motilit Soc. 2011;23(9):819–30. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2982.2011.01738.x.
Kellow JE, Borody TJ, Phillips SF, et al. Human interdigestive motility: variations in patterns from esophagus to colon. Gastroenterology. 1986;91(2):386–95.
Sjovall H. Meaningful or redundant complexity—mechanisms behind cyclic changes in gastroduodenal pH in the fasting state. Acta Physiol. 2011;201(1):127–31. doi:10.1111/j.1748-1716.2010.02155.x.
Dooley CP, Di Lorenzo C, Valenzuela JE. Variability of migrating motor complex in humans. Dig Dis Sci. 1992;37(5):723–8.
Deloose E, Janssen P, Depoortere I, et al. The migrating motor complex: control mechanisms and its role in health and disease. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;9(5):271–85. doi:10.1038/nrgastro.2012.57.
Carlson A. Contributions to the physiology of the stomach—II. The relation between the contractions of the empty stomach and the sensation of hunger. Am J Physiol. 1913;31(4):175–92.
Janssen P, Vanden Berghe P, Verschueren S, et al. Review article: the role of gastric motility in the control of food intake. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2011;33(8):880–94. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2036.2011.04609.x.
Le Blanc-Louvry I, Ducrotte P, Peillon C, et al. Roux-en-Y limb motility after total or distal gastrectomy in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2000;190(4):408–17.
Roberts K, Duffy A, Kaufman J, et al. Size matters: gastric pouch size correlates with weight loss after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Endosc. 2007;21(8):1397–402. doi:10.1007/s00464-007-9232-x.
Cottam DR, Fisher B, Sridhar V, et al. The effect of stoma size on weight loss after laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery: results of a blinded randomized controlled trial. Obes Surg. 2009;19(1):13–7. doi:10.1007/s11695-008-9753-y.
Topart P, Becouarn G, Ritz P. Pouch size after gastric bypass does not correlate with weight loss outcome. Obes Surg. 2011;21(9):1350–4. doi:10.1007/s11695-011-0460-8.
Heneghan HM, Yimcharoen P, Brethauer SA, et al. Influence of pouch and stoma size on weight loss after gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis Offic J Am Soc Bariat Surg. 2012;8(4):408–15. doi:10.1016/j.soard.2011.09.010.
Laurenius A, Larsson I, Bueter M, et al. Changes in eating behaviour and meal pattern following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Int J Obes (Lond). 2012;36(3):348–55. doi:10.1038/ijo.2011.217.
Gustavsson S, Ilstrup DM, Morrison P, et al. Roux-Y stasis syndrome after gastrectomy. Am J Surg. 1988;155(3):490–4.
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge My Engström and Niclas Björnfot (research nurses), as well as Sören Lundberg (research engineer), for skilful assistance at clinical examinations and data analysis.
Conflicts of Interest
Dr. Lönroth has received an unrestricted research grant from Johnson & Johnson Ethicon Surgical Care. Drs. Björklund and Fändriks declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Funding
Financial support was obtained from the Sahlgrenska University Hospital ALF grants and from the Gothenburg Medical Association.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Björklund, P., Lönroth, H. & Fändriks, L. Manometry of the Upper Gut Following Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Indicates That the Gastric Pouch and Roux Limb Act as a Common Cavity. OBES SURG 25, 1833–1841 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-015-1639-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-015-1639-1