Skip to main content
Log in

Manometry of the Upper Gut Following Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Indicates That the Gastric Pouch and Roux Limb Act as a Common Cavity

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The motility of the upper gut after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) is underexplored. We aimed to investigate the oesophago-gastro-Roux limb motor activity during fasting and after food intake.

Methods

Eighteen morbidly obese patients were examined at least 2 years after RYGBP. A high-resolution manometry catheter was positioned to straddle the oesophagogastric junction, the gastric pouch and the proximal Roux limb using transmucosal potential difference measurements. Three patients with vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG) were also studied.

Results

During the fasting state, the gastric pouch had low or no activity whereas the Roux limb exhibited regular migrating motility complexes (MMCs) being initiated just distal to gastroenteroanastomosis. Median cycle duration was 72 min, and the median propagating velocity of the phase III MMC phase was 2.7 cm/min (n = 8). When patients were asked to eat until they felt comfortably full, intraluminal pressure increased by 6 to 8 cmH2O without any significant difference between gastric pouch and the Roux limb (n = 9). The increased intraluminal pressure following food intake correlated neither to weight loss nor to meal size or rate of eating.

Conclusions

A successful RYGBP is associated with MMC in the Roux limb during fasting. The gastric pouch and the Roux limb behaved as a common cavity during food ingestion. Data do not support the hypothesis that the alimentary limb pressure in response to food intake influences either meal size or weight loss.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. WHO. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs311/en/). Downloaded October 2014.

  2. Sjostrom L. Review of the key results from the Swedish Obese Subjects (SOS) trial—a prospective controlled intervention study of bariatric surgery. J Intern Med. 2013;273(3):219–34. doi:10.1111/joim.12012.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Werling M, Olbers T, Fandriks L, et al. Increased postprandial energy expenditure may explain superior long term weight loss after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass compared to vertical banded gastroplasty. PLoS One. 2013;8(4):e60280. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0060280.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Horner KM, Byrne NM, Cleghorn GJ, et al. The effects of weight loss strategies on gastric emptying and appetite control. Obes Rev Offic J Int Assoc Stud Obes. 2011;12(11):935–51. doi:10.1111/j.1467-789X.2011.00901.x.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bjorklund P, Laurenius A, Een E, et al. Is the Roux limb a determinant for meal size after gastric bypass surgery? Obes Surg. 2010;20(10):1408–14. doi:10.1007/s11695-010-0192-1.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ardila-Hani A, Soffer EE. Review article: the impact of bariatric surgery on gastrointestinal motility. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2011;34(8):825–31. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2036.2011.04812.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mathias JR, Khanna R, Nealon WH, et al. Roux-limb motility after total gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y anastomosis in patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. Dig Dis Sci. 1992;37(4):545–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Miedema BW, Kelly KA, Camilleri M, et al. Human gastric and jejunal transit and motility after Roux gastrojejunostomy. Gastroenterology. 1992;103(4):1133–43.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. van der Mijle HC, Kleibeuker JH, Limburg AJ, et al. Manometric and scintigraphic studies of the relation between motility disturbances in the Roux limb and the Roux-en-Y syndrome. Am J Surg. 1993;166(1):11–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Tu BN, Kelly KA. Motility disorders after Roux-en-Y Gastrojejunostomy. Obes Surg. 1994;4(3):219–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Herbella FA, Silva LC, Vicentine FP, et al. Roux-en-Y limb motility after total gastrectomy. J Gastro Surg Offic J Soc Surg Aliment Tract. 2014;18(5):906–10. doi:10.1007/s11605-014-2473-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lonroth H, Dalenback J, Haglind E, et al. Laparoscopic gastric bypass. Another option in bariatric surgery. Surg Endosc. 1996;10(6):636–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Olbers T, Lonroth H, Fagevik-Olsen M, et al. Laparoscopic gastric bypass: development of technique, respiratory function, and long-term outcome. Obes Surg. 2003;13(3):364–70. doi:10.1381/096089203765887679.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Casselbrant A, Edebo A, Wennerblom J, et al. Actions by angiotensin II on esophageal contractility in humans. Gastroenterology. 2007;132(1):249–60. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2006.11.010.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mellander A, Jarbur K, Sjovall H. Pressure and frequency dependent linkage between motility and epithelial secretion in human proximal small intestine. Gut. 2000;46(3):376–84.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Husebye E. The patterns of small bowel motility: physiology and implications in organic disease and functional disorders. Neurogastro Motilit Offic J Eur Gastroint Motilit Soc. 1999;11(3):141–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Pandolfino JE, Ghosh SK, Rice J, et al. Classifying esophageal motility by pressure topography characteristics: a study of 400 patients and 75 controls. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;103(1):27–37. doi:10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01532.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hershcovici T, Mashimo H, Fass R. The lower esophageal sphincter. Neurogastro Motilit Offic J Eur Gastroint Motilit Soc. 2011;23(9):819–30. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2982.2011.01738.x.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kellow JE, Borody TJ, Phillips SF, et al. Human interdigestive motility: variations in patterns from esophagus to colon. Gastroenterology. 1986;91(2):386–95.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sjovall H. Meaningful or redundant complexity—mechanisms behind cyclic changes in gastroduodenal pH in the fasting state. Acta Physiol. 2011;201(1):127–31. doi:10.1111/j.1748-1716.2010.02155.x.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Dooley CP, Di Lorenzo C, Valenzuela JE. Variability of migrating motor complex in humans. Dig Dis Sci. 1992;37(5):723–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Deloose E, Janssen P, Depoortere I, et al. The migrating motor complex: control mechanisms and its role in health and disease. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;9(5):271–85. doi:10.1038/nrgastro.2012.57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Carlson A. Contributions to the physiology of the stomach—II. The relation between the contractions of the empty stomach and the sensation of hunger. Am J Physiol. 1913;31(4):175–92.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Janssen P, Vanden Berghe P, Verschueren S, et al. Review article: the role of gastric motility in the control of food intake. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2011;33(8):880–94. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2036.2011.04609.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Le Blanc-Louvry I, Ducrotte P, Peillon C, et al. Roux-en-Y limb motility after total or distal gastrectomy in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2000;190(4):408–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Roberts K, Duffy A, Kaufman J, et al. Size matters: gastric pouch size correlates with weight loss after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Endosc. 2007;21(8):1397–402. doi:10.1007/s00464-007-9232-x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Cottam DR, Fisher B, Sridhar V, et al. The effect of stoma size on weight loss after laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery: results of a blinded randomized controlled trial. Obes Surg. 2009;19(1):13–7. doi:10.1007/s11695-008-9753-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Topart P, Becouarn G, Ritz P. Pouch size after gastric bypass does not correlate with weight loss outcome. Obes Surg. 2011;21(9):1350–4. doi:10.1007/s11695-011-0460-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Heneghan HM, Yimcharoen P, Brethauer SA, et al. Influence of pouch and stoma size on weight loss after gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis Offic J Am Soc Bariat Surg. 2012;8(4):408–15. doi:10.1016/j.soard.2011.09.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Laurenius A, Larsson I, Bueter M, et al. Changes in eating behaviour and meal pattern following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Int J Obes (Lond). 2012;36(3):348–55. doi:10.1038/ijo.2011.217.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Gustavsson S, Ilstrup DM, Morrison P, et al. Roux-Y stasis syndrome after gastrectomy. Am J Surg. 1988;155(3):490–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge My Engström and Niclas Björnfot (research nurses), as well as Sören Lundberg (research engineer), for skilful assistance at clinical examinations and data analysis.

Conflicts of Interest

Dr. Lönroth has received an unrestricted research grant from Johnson & Johnson Ethicon Surgical Care. Drs. Björklund and Fändriks declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Funding

Financial support was obtained from the Sahlgrenska University Hospital ALF grants and from the Gothenburg Medical Association.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lars Fändriks.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Björklund, P., Lönroth, H. & Fändriks, L. Manometry of the Upper Gut Following Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Indicates That the Gastric Pouch and Roux Limb Act as a Common Cavity. OBES SURG 25, 1833–1841 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-015-1639-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-015-1639-1

Keywords

Navigation