Skip to main content
Log in

Neurophysiologic Monitoring Can Predict Iatrogenic Injury During Acetabular and Pelvic Fracture Fixation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
HSS Journal ®

Abstract

Background:

Nerve injury during acetabular and pelvic fracture fixation can have devastating consequences for trauma patients already in a compromised situation.

Questions/Purposes:

This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of multimodality intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring during acetabular and pelvic fracture fixation in identifying emerging iatrogenic nerve injury.

Methods:

Sixty patients were retrospectively identified after surgical fixation following acetabular or pelvic fracture. Neuromonitoring during surgery was performed using three different modalities, transcranial electric motor evoked potential (tceMEP), somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP), and electromyographic (EMG) monitoring. Each modality was evaluated for sensitivity and specificity of detecting an intraoperative nerve injury.

Results:

tceMEP monitoring was found to be 100% sensitive and 86% specific at detecting an impending nerve injury. The sensitivity and specificity of SSEP were 75% and 94%, while EMG sensitivity was unacceptably low at 20% although specificity was 93%.

Conclusions:

Multimodality neuromonitoring of transcranial electric motor and peroneal nerve somatosensory evoked potentials with or without spontaneous EMG monitoring is a safe and effective method for detecting impending nerve injury during acetabular and pelvic surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Baumgaertner MR, Wegner D, Booke J. SSEP monitoring during pelvic and acetabular fracture surgery. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma. 1994; 8: 125-133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Calder HB, Mast J, Johnstone C. Intraoperative evoked potential monitoring in acetabular surgery. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 1994; 305: 160-167.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Devlin VJ, Schwartz DM. Intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring during spinal surgery. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2007; 15: 549-560.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Eggspuehler A, Sutter MA, Grob D, et al. Multimodal intraoperative monitoring during surgery of spinal deformities in 217 patients. European Spine Journal. 2007; 16: S188-S196.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Eggspuehler A, Sutter MA, Grob D, et al. Multimodal intraoperative monitoring (MIOM) during cervical spine surgical procedures in 246 patients. European Spine Journal. 2007; 16: S209-S215.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Haidukewych GJ, Scaduto J, Herscovici D Jr, et al. Iatrogenic nerve injury in acetabular fracture surgery: a comparison of monitored and unmonitored procedures. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma. 2002; 16: 297-301.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Helfet DL, Anand N, Malkani AL, et al. Intraoperative monitoring of motor pathways during operative fixation of acute acetabular fractures. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma. 1997; 11: 2-6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Helfet D, Koval K, Hissa EA, et al. Intraoperative somatosensory evoked potential monitoring during acute pelvic fracture surgery. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma. 1995; 9: 28-34.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hilibrand AS, Schwartz DM, Sethuraman V, et al. Comparison of transcranial electric motor and somatosensory evoked potential monitoring during cervical spine surgery. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery American Volume. 2004; 86: 1248-1253.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kelleher MO, Tan G, Sarjeant R, et al. Predictive value of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during cervical spine surgery: a prospective analysis of 1055 consecutive patients. Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine. 2008; 8: 215-221.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Morgan SJ, Jeray KJ, Phieffer LS, et al. Attitudes of orthopaedic trauma surgeons regarding current controversies in the management of pelvic and acetabular fractures. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma. 2001; 15: 526-532.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Pring ME, Trousdale RT, Cabanela ME, et al. Intraoperative electromyographic monitoring during periacetabular osteotomy. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 2002; 400: 158-164.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Schwartz DM, Auerbach JD, Dormans JP, et al. Neurophysiologic detection of impending spinal cord injury during surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a comparison of transcranial electric motor and somatosensory evoked potential monitoring. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery American Volume. 2007; 89: 2440-2449.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sutherland CJ, Miller DH, Owen JH. Use of spontaneous electromyography during revision and complex total hip arthroplasty. The Journal of Arthroplasty. 1996; 11: 123-233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Vrahas M, Gordon RG, Mears DC, et al. Intraoperative somatosensory evoked potential monitoring of pelvic and acetabular fractures. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma. 1992; 6: 50-58.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

Conflict of Interest:

Manny Porat, MD; Nitin Goyal, MD; and Zachary Post, MD, have declared that they have no conflict of interest. Fabio Orozco, MD, is a paid consultant for Medtronics and Stryker, outside the work. Alvin Ong, MD, is a paid consultant for Medtronics and Stryker and Smith and Nephew, outside the work.

Human/Animal Rights:

All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008 (5).

Informed Consent:

Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.

Required Author Forms

Disclosure forms provided by the authors are available with the online version of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manny Porat MD.

Additional information

Level of Evidence: Level IV: Case Series. See levels of evidence for a complete description.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(PDF 510 kb)

ESM 2

(PDF 510 kb)

ESM 3

(PDF 510 kb)

ESM 4

(PDF 510 kb)

ESM 5

(PDF 510 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Porat, M., Orozco, F., Goyal, N. et al. Neurophysiologic Monitoring Can Predict Iatrogenic Injury During Acetabular and Pelvic Fracture Fixation. HSS Jrnl 9, 218–222 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11420-013-9347-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11420-013-9347-7

Keywords

Navigation