Skip to main content
Log in

An overview of local capacity in wireless networks

  • Published:
Telecommunication Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article introduces a metric for performance evaluation of medium access schemes in wireless ad hoc networks known as local capacity. Although deriving the end-to-end capacity of wireless ad hoc networks is a difficult problem, the local capacity framework allows us to quantify the average information rate received by a receiver node randomly located in the network. In this article, the basic network model and analytical tools are first discussed and applied to a simple network to derive the local capacity of various medium access schemes. Our goal is to identify the most optimal scheme and also to see how does it compare with more practical medium access schemes. We analyzed grid pattern schemes where simultaneous transmitters are positioned in a regular grid pattern, ALOHA schemes where simultaneous transmitters are dispatched according to a uniform Poisson distribution and exclusion schemes where simultaneous transmitters are dispatched according to an exclusion rule such as node coloring and carrier sense schemes. Our analysis shows that local capacity is optimal when simultaneous transmitters are positioned in a grid pattern based on equilateral triangles and our results show that this optimal local capacity is at most double the local capacity of ALOHA based scheme. Our results also show that node coloring and carrier sense schemes approach the optimal local capacity by an almost negligible difference. At the end, we also discuss the shortcomings in our model as well as future research directions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Baccelli, F., & Blaszczyszyn, B. (2009). Stochastic geometry and wireless networks, volume II—Applications. Foundations and Trends in Networking, 4(1–2), 1–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Baccelli, F., Blaszczyszyn, B., & Muhlethaler, P. (2006). An ALOHA protocol for multihop mobile wireless networks. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 52(2).

  3. Bao, L., & Garcia-Luna-Aceves, J. (2001). A new approach to channel access scheduling for ad hoc networks. In International conference on mobile computing and networking.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Blaszczyszyn, B., Muhlethaler, P., & Banaouas, S. (2010). A comparison of ALOHA and CSMA in wireless ad hoc networks under different channel conditions. In INRIA-00530093.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Busson, A., & Chelius, G. (2009). Point processes for interference modeling in CSMA/CA ad hoc networks. In PE-WASUN.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Derbel, B., & Talbi, E.-G. (2010). Distributed node coloring in the SINR model. ICDCS.

  7. Franceschetti, M., Dousse, O., Tse, D. N. C., & Thiran, P. (2007). Closing the gap in the capacity of wireless networks via percolation theory. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 53(3).

  8. Ganti, R. K., Andrews, J. G., & Haenggi, M. (2010). High-SIR transmission capacity of wireless networks with general fading and node distribution. CoRR. arXiv:1010.1584.

  9. Gupta, P., & Kumar, P. R. (2000). The capacity of wireless networks. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 46(2).

  10. Haenggi, M. (2009). Outage, local throughput, and capacity of random wireless networks. IEEE Transaction on Wireless Communication, 8.

  11. Hasan, A., & Andrews, J. (2007). The guard zone in wireless ad hoc networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 6.

  12. Hong, K., & Hua, Y. (2007). Throughput analysis of large wireless networks with regular topologies. EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

  13. Jacquet, P. (2009). Shannon capacity in poisson wireless network model. Problems of Information Transmission, 45.

  14. Jovicic, A., Viswanath, P., & Kulkarni, S. (2004). Upper bounds to transport capacity of wireless networks. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 50(11).

  15. Kaynia, M., & Jindal, N. (2008). Performance of ALOHA and CSMA in spatially distributed wireless networks. In IEEE international conference on communications, May 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kleinrock, L., & Tobagi, F. (1975). Packet switching in radio channels: Part 1—Carrier sense multiple-access modes and their throughput-delay characteristics. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 23(12).

  17. Lauwens, B., Scheers, B., & Vande Capelle, A. (2010). Performance analysis of unslotted CSMA/CA in wireless networks. Telecommunication Systems, 44. doi:10.1007/s11235-009-9220-7.

  18. Liu, X., & Haenggi, M. (2005). Throughput analysis of fading sensor networks with regular and random topologies. EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking, 2005.

  19. Nelson, R., & Kleinrock, L. (1984). The spatial capacity of slotted ALOHA multihop packet radio network with capture. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 32(6).

  20. Park, C., Han, D., & Ahn, S. (2006). Performance analysis of MAC layer protocols in the IEEE 802.11 wireless LAN. Telecommunication Systems, 33. doi:10.1007/s11235-006-9013-1.

  21. Ramanathan, R. (1997). A unified framework and algorithm for (T/F/C)DMA channel assignment in wireless networks. In IEEE INFOCOM.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rhee, I., Warrier, A., Min, J., & Xu, L. (2009). DRAND: distributed randomized TDMA scheduling for wireless ad hoc networks. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 8(10).

  23. Rozovsky, R., & Kumar, P. R. (2001). SEEDEX: a MAC protocol for ad hoc networks. In MobiHoc.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Tanemura, M. (1979). On random complete packing by discs. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 31.

  25. Vergados, D., Sgora, A., Vergados, D., Vouyioukas, D., & Anagnostopoulos, I. (2010). Fair TDMA scheduling in wireless multi-hop networks. Telecommunications Systems. doi:10.1007/s11235-010-9397-9.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Weber, S., Yang, X., Andrews, J., & de Veciana, G. (2005). Transmission capacity of wireless ad hoc networks with outage constraints. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 51(12).

  27. Weber, S., Andrews, J., & Jindal, N. (2010). An overview of the transmission capacity of wireless networks. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 58.

  28. Xue, F., & Kumar, P. R. (2006). Scaling laws for ad hoc wireless networks: an information theoretic approach. Foundations and Trends in Networking, 1.

  29. Zhu, C., & Corson, M. S. (2001). A five-phase reservation protocol (FPRP) for mobile ad hoc networks. Wireless Networks

  30. Zorzi, M., & Pupolin, S. (1995). Optimum transmission ranges in multihop packet radio networks in the presence of fading. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 43(7).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Salman Malik.

Appendix

Appendix

1.1 A.1 Locating the starting point z on the closed curve bounding the reception area

The SIR S i (z) at point z should be greater or at least equal to β. We assume that it is equal to β. Therefore, at point z, we have

$$\frac{|z-z_{i}|^{-\alpha}}{\underset{j\neq i}{\sum}|z-z_{j}|^{-\alpha }}=\beta. $$

Our aim is to find the coordinates of point z which satisfy the above relation. To simplify computation of point z on the closed curve, bounding reception area of transmitter i located at z i =(x i ,y i ), its y coordinate can be fixed such that z=(x,y)=(x,y i ). This reduces the above equation to

$$ \frac{|x-x_{i}|}{\underset{j\neq i}{\sum}|z-z_{j}|}-\beta=0. $$
(10)

Equation (10) is a function of variable x and can be solved using Newton’s Method.

Remark

Newton’s Method: Given a function f(x) and its derivative f′(x), begin with a first guess x 0. Provided the function is reasonably well-behaved, a better approximation x 1 is \(:=x_{0}-\frac{f(x_{0})}{f'(x_{0})}\). The process is repeated until a sufficiently accurate value is reached:

$$ x_{n+1}=x_{n}-\frac{f(x_{n})}{f'(x_{n})}. $$
(11)

From (10)

$$f(x)=\frac{|x-x_{i}|^{-\alpha}}{\underset{j\neq i}{\sum }|z-z_{j}|^{-\alpha}}-\beta. $$

We assume that \(g=r_{i}^{-\alpha}\) and \(h=\underset{j\neq i}{\sum }r_{j}^{-\alpha}\) where r i =|xx i | and r j =|zz j |.

Newton’s Method requires the derivative of f(x) which is computed as below.

$$\begin{aligned} &{\frac{d}{dx}g=-\alpha\frac{x-x_{i}}{r_{i}^{\alpha+2}}}\\ &{\frac{d}{dx}h=\underset{j\neq i}{\sum}-\alpha\frac {z-z_{j}}{r_{j}^{\alpha+2}}} \end{aligned}$$

The first derivative of the function f(x) is,

$$\begin{aligned} f'(x) & =\frac{1}{h^{2}}\biggl(h\frac{d}{dx}g-g \frac{d}{dx}h\biggr) \\ & =\frac{ ((\underset{j\neq i}{\sum}r_{j}^{-\alpha})(-\alpha\frac {x-x_{i}}{r_{i}^{\alpha+2}})-(r_{i}^{-\alpha})(-\alpha\frac {z-z_{j}}{r_{j}^{\alpha+2}}) )}{\frac{1}{ [\underset{j\neq i}{\sum}r_{j}^{-\alpha} ]}} \end{aligned}$$

Newton’s Method also requires first approximation of the root, x 0. An approximate value, closer to the actual root, can significantly reduce the number of iterations in Newton’s Method.

In all three types of grid networks, the transmitter closest to i, hereafter referred to as j, lies at distance d and hence can give the best estimate x 0. For first approximation x 0, we can ignore all other transmitters in the network. In this case,

$$\begin{aligned} &\frac{|z-z_{i}|^{-\alpha}}{|z-z_{j}|^{-\alpha}} \geq\beta \\ &\frac{r_{i}^{-\alpha}}{r_{j}^{-\alpha}} \geq\beta:i\neq j, \end{aligned}$$

where r i =|zz i | and r j =|zz j | and we get

$$\frac{r_{j}}{r_{i}}\leq(\beta)^{\frac{1}{\alpha}} $$

The location of transmitters i and j and point z in the plane form three corners of a triangle with angle θ equal to 0 in case of square and triangular grid and π/6 radians in case of hexagonal grid layout. Figure 7 shows the location of transmitters z i and z j , point z and distances r i , r j and d. Using above relation between r i and r j and the Law of Cosines, we get the solution of r i as

$$r_{i}=\frac{-B\pm\sqrt{B^{2}-4AC}}{2A}, $$

where \(A=1-K^{\frac{2}{\alpha}}\), B=−2.d.cos(θ) and C=d 2 where d is the distance between transmitters i and j and is a known parameter of the grid layout.

Fig. 7
figure 7

Geometric representation of finding the first approximation of point z=(x 0,y i )

Remark

Select positive value of r i as the solution of the above quadratic equation. Using x 0=x i +r i as the first approximate solution in Newton’s Method (11), and after a few iterations, we can get a sufficiently accurate value x n+1 which will be the x coordinate of the point z.

The coordinates of point z will be: (x n+1,y i ).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Malik, S., Jacquet, P. An overview of local capacity in wireless networks. Telecommun Syst 55, 225–240 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11235-013-9777-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11235-013-9777-z

Keywords

Navigation