Skip to main content
Log in

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of marimastat in glioblastoma multiforme patients following surgery and irradiation

  • Clinical--patient studies
  • Published:
Journal of Neuro-Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Purpose

Because raised matrix metalloprotease (MMP) levels are associated with glioma invasion and angiogenesis, we tested the efficacy of marimastat (MT) an orally active drug that can reduce MMP levels, in patients with gliomas.

Patients and Methods

A total of 162 patients with intracranial glioblastoma multiforme or gliosarcomas who had undergone surgery and radiotherapy participated in this multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group study conducted at 20 institutions. Seventy-nine patients (57 male, 22 female, median age 58 years) were randomized to receive placebo (PB), and 83 patients (51 male, 32 female, median age 57 years) were randomized to receive MT, 10 mg orally twice daily, until tumor progression.

Results

This intention-to-treat efficacy analysis showed no statistically significant difference between MT and PB groups with respect to survival (P=0.38, log rank test). The median survival time from protocol initiation was 37.9 weeks for the PB group and 42.9 weeks for the MT group, with a hazard ratio of 1.16 (95% CI 0.83 to 1.60). There were no statistically significant differences in quality of life between the PB and MT groups, as assessed by the FACT-BR questionnaire. Musculoskeletal toxicities led to dose modification or withdrawal in 20% of MT-treated and 1.2% of PB-treated patients.

Conclusion

MT does not improve survival in patients with glioblastoma or gliosarcoma following surgery and radiotherapy. Therefore, single-agent MT appears unwarranted; however, MT in combination with cytotoxic chemotherapy may be warranted, as suggested by observations in our study and other studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Levin VA, Uhm JH, Jaeckle KA, et al, Phase III randomized study of postradiotherapy chemotherapy with alpha-difluoromethylornithine-procarbazine, N-(2-chloroethyl)-N′-cyclohexyl-N-nitrosurea, vincristine (DFMO-PCV) versus PCV for glioblastoma multiforme Clin Cancer Res 6:3878–3884, 2000

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Levin VA, Leibel SA, Gutin PH, Neoplasms of the central nervous system in DeVita VTJ, Hellman S, Rosenberg SA, (eds): Cancer: Principles and Practice of Oncology ed 6 Lippincott-Raven Philadelphia 2001, pp 2100–2160

    Google Scholar 

  3. Rao JS, Yamamoto M, Mohaman S, et al., Expression and localization of 92 kDa type IV collagenase/gelatinase B (MMP−9) in human gliomas Clin Exp Metastasis 14: 12–18, 1996

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sawaya RE, Yamamoto M, Gokaslan ZL, et al, Expression and localization of 72 kDa type IV collagenase (MMP−2) in human malignant gliomas in vivo Clin Exp Metastasis 14:35–42, 1996

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Rao JS, Molecular mechanisms of glioma invasiveness: the role of proteases Nat Rev Cancer 3:489–501, 2003

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Zucker S, Cao J, Chen WT, Critical appraisal of the use of matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors in cancer treatment Oncogene 19:6642–6650, 2000

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Brown PD, Giavazzi R, Matrix metalloproteinase inhibition: a review of anti-tumour activity Ann Oncol 6:967–974, 1995

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Nemunaitis J, Poole C, Primrose J, et al, Combined analysis of studies of the effects of the matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor marimastat on serum tumor markers in advanced cancer: selection of a biologically active and tolerable dose for longer-term studies Clin Cancer Res 4:1101–1109, 1998

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Burger PC, Vogel FS, Green SB, et al, Glioblastoma multiforme and anaplastic astrocytoma. Pathologic criteria and prognostic implications Cancer 56:1106–1111, 1985

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Burger PC, Scheithauer BW, Vogel FS, Surgical Pathology of the Nervous System and its Coverings 3rd edn Churchill Livingstone New York 1991

    Google Scholar 

  11. Weitzner MA, Meyers CA, Byrne K, Psychosocial functioning and quality of life in patients with primary brain tumors J Neurosurg 84:29–34, 1996

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Weitzner MA, Meyers CA, Gelke CK, et al, The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) scale. Development of a brain subscale and revalidation of the general version (FACT-G) in patients with primary brain tumors Cancer 75:1151–1161, 1995

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Macdonald DR, Cascino TL, Schold SC, Jr., et al, Response criteria for phase II studies of supratentorial malignant glioma J Clin Oncol 8:1277–1280, 1990

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Levin VA, Crafts DC, Norman DM, et al, Criteria for evaluating patients undergoing chemotherapy for malignant brain tumors J Neurosurg 47:329–335, 1977

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Taves DR, Minimization: a new method of assigning patients to treatment and control groups Clin Pharmacol Ther 15:443–453, 1974

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Leibel SA, Scott CB, Loeffler JS, Contemporary approaches to the treatment of malignant gliomas with radiation therapy Semin Oncol 21:198–219, 1994

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Brown PD, Matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors: a novel class of anticancer agents Adv Enzyme Regul 35:293–301, 1995

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Groves MD, Puduvalli VK, Hess KR, et al, Phase II trial of temozolomide plus the matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor, marimastat, in recurrent and progressive glioblastoma multiforme J Clin Oncol 20:1383–1388, 2002

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Yung WK, Albright RE, Olson J, et al, A phase II study of temozolomide vs. procarbazine in patients with glioblastoma multiforme at first relapse Br J Cancer 83:588–593, 2000

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. King J, Zhao J, Clingan P, et al, Randomised double blind placebo control study of adjuvant treatment with the metalloproteinase inhibitor, Marimastat in patients with inoperable colorectal hepatic metastases: significant survival advantage in patients with musculoskeletal side-effects Anticancer Res 23:639–645, 2003

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Overall CM, Lopez-Otin C, Strategies for MMP inhibition in cancer: innovations for the post-trial era Nat Rev Cancer 2:657–672, 2002

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Coussens LM, Fingleton B, Matrisian LM, Matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors and cancer: trials and tribulations Science 295:2387–2392, 2002

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Patterson BC, Sang QA, Angiostatin-converting enzyme activities of human matrilysin (MMP−7) and gelatinase B/type IV collagenase (MMP−9) J Biol Chem 272:28823–28825, 1997

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. O’Reilly MS, Wiederschain D, Stetler-Stevenson WG, et al, Regulation of angiostatin production by matrix metalloproteinase−2 in a model of concomitant resistance J Biol Chem 274:29568–29571, 1999

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Vazquez F, Hastings G, Ortega MA, et al, METH−1, a human ortholog of ADAMTS−1, and METH−2 are members of a new family of proteins with angio-inhibitory activity J Biol Chem 274:23349–23357, 1999

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Toth M, Bernardo MM, Gervasi DC, et al, Tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase (TIMP)−2 acts synergistically with synthetic matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) inhibitors but not with TIMP−4 to enhance the (Membrane type 1)-MMP-dependent activation of pro-MMP−2 J Biol Chem 275:41415–41423, 2000

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Osoba D, Brada M, Yung WKA, et al, Health-related quality of life in patients treated with temozolomide versus procarbazine for recurrent glioblastoma multiforme J Clin Oncol 18:1481–1491, 2000

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Groves ES, Puduvalli V, Conrad CA, et al.: Temozolomide plus the matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor, marimastat, for recurrent anaplastic gliomas. J Clin Oncol submitted, 2006

Download references

Acknowledgement

We would like to thank Betty Notzon for editorial assistance and Melissa McLane for manuscript preparation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Victor A. Levin.

Additional information

This work was presented in part at the 37th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, San Francisco, CA, on May 13, 2001, and supported by British Biotech Pharmaceuticals, Watlington Road, Oxford, OX4 6LY, UK. No author currently has a financial interest in Marimastat. Mark Baillet is currently with Origin Pharmaceutical Services Ltd.

*Participating institutions are listed in Table 1. Clinician authorship required ≥10 patient accrual from participating institution.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Levin, V.A., Phuphanich, S., Alfred Yung, W. et al. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of marimastat in glioblastoma multiforme patients following surgery and irradiation . J Neurooncol 78, 295–302 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-005-9098-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-005-9098-5

Keywords

Navigation