Abstract
The balance between the potential benefits and risks of nanotechnology is discussed based on judgments expressed by leading industry, academe and government experts at a U.S. National Nanotechnology Initiative (NNI) sponsored meeting. The results are summarized in various themes related to: economic impacts and commercialization; social scenarios; technological convergence; quality of life; ethics and law; governance, public perceptions, and education.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
ETC, 2003. No small matter II: The case for a global moratorium size matters!. ETC Occasional Paper Series (see report on http://www.etcgroup.org/documents/Occ. Paper_Nanosafety.pdf)
European Commission, 2004. Nanotechnology: A preliminary risk analysis on the basis of a preliminary workshop. Brussels, March 1 2, 2004 (see report on europa.eu.int/comm./health/ph_risk/documents/ev_20040301_en.pdf)
Greenpeace, 2004. Nanotechnology. Greenpeace (see report on http://www.greenpeace.org.uk)
Meridian Institute, 2004. Summary of the International Dialogue for Responsible R&D of Nanotechnology. Sponsored by NSF, Alexandria, Virginia, US. (http://www.nsf.gov/home/crssprgm/nano/dialog.htm)
NSET, 2003a. NNI Grand Challenge Workshop: Nanoscale Processes for Environmental Improvement, Arlington, VA, May 8 10, 2003 (see report on the website http://www.nano.gov)
NSET, 2003b. NNI Workshop on Nanobiotechnology, Arlington, VA, October 9 11, 2003 (see report on the website http://www.nano.gov)
Roco M.C., R.S. Williams, & P. Alivisatos, eds., 1999. Nanotechnology Research Directions. U.S. National Science and Technology Council, Washington, D.C., (also Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, 2000, 316 pages), (see report on http://www.nano.gov and http://www.nsf.gov/nano)
Roco M.C. & W.S. Bainbridge, eds., 2000. Societal Implications of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology. National Science Foundation Report, Arlington, Virginia (also published by Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, 2001, 370 pages; see report on http://www.nano.gov and http://www.nsf.gov/nano)
Roco M.C. & W.S. Bainbridge, eds., 2005. Societal Implications of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology (II): Maximizing Human Benefit. NSET Report, Arlington, Virginia (also published by Springer Science, forthcoming; see report on http://www.nano.gov and http://www.nsf.gov/nano)
M.C. Roco W.S. Bainbridge (2002) ArticleTitleConverging technologies for improving human performance J. Nanoparticle Res. 4 IssueID4 281–295
Roco, M.C., 2003. Broader Societal Issues of Nanotechnology. J. Nanoparticle Res., 5(3 4), 181–189 (see paper on the website http://www.nsf.gov/nano)
M.C. Roco (2004) ArticleTitleThe U.S. National Nanotechnology Initiative after 3 years (2001 2003) J. Nanoparticle Res. 6 IssueID1 1–10
The Royal Society and the Royal Academy of Engineering, 2004. Nanoscience and Nanotechnologies: Opportunities and Uncertainties. London, UK. (see report on http://www.royalsoc.ac.uk)
Swiss Re, 2004. Nanotechnology: Small matter, many unknowns. Swiss Re, Switzerland (see report on http://www.swissre.com)
L. Wolfgang (Eds) (2004) Industrial Application of Nanomaterials Chances and Risks VDI Technologiezentrum Dusseldorf, Germany
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Roco, M.C., Bainbridge, W. Societal implications of nanoscience and nanotechnology: Maximizing human benefit. J Nanopart Res 7, 1–13 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-004-2336-5
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-004-2336-5