Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Carbon Dioxide Balance of Wood Substitution: Comparing Concrete- and Wood-Framed Buildings

  • Published:
Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study a method is suggested to compare the net carbon dioxide (CO2) emission from the construction of concrete- and wood-framed buildings. The method is then applied to two buildings in Sweden and Finland constructed with wood frames, compared with functionally equivalent buildings constructed with concrete frames. Carbon accounting includes: emissions due to fossil fuel use in the production of building materials; the replacement of fossil fuels by biomass residues from logging, wood processing, construction and demolition; carbon stock changes in forests and buildings; and cement process reactions. The results show that wood-framed construction requires less energy, and emits less CO2 to the atmosphere, than concrete-framed construction. The lifecycle emission difference between the wood- and concrete-framed buildings ranges from 30 to 130 kg C per m2 of floor area. Hence, a net reduction of CO2 emission can be obtained by increasing the proportion of wood-based building materials, relative to concrete materials. The benefits would be greatest if the biomass residues resulting from the production of the wood building materials were fully used in energy supply systems. The carbon mitigation efficiency, expressed in terms of biomass used per unit of reduced carbon emission, is considerably better if the wood is used to replace concrete building material than if the wood is used directly as biofuel.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adalberth, K.: 2000, Energy Use and Environmental Impact of New Residential Buildings. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Building Physics, Lund University, Sweden.

  • Adalberth, K.: 2002, Excel file WALLUDD.XLS. karin.adalvberth@jw.se

  • Bengtson, A.: 2003, Framing Technological Development in a Concrete Context: The Use of Wood in the Swedish Construction Industry. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Business Studies, Uppsala University, Sweden.

  • Björklund, T. and Tillman, A.-M.: 1997, LCA of Building Frame Structures: Environmental Impacts over the Life Cycle of Wooden and Concrete Frames. Technical Environmental Planning Report 1997:2. Chalmers University of Technology, Sweden.

  • Börjesson, P.: 1996, ‘Energy analysis of biomass production and transportation’, Biomass and Bioenergy. 11(4), 305–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Börjesson, P. and Gustavsson, L.: 2000, ‘Greenhouse gas balances in building construction: Wood versus concrete from lifecycle and forest land-use perspectives’, Energy Policy 28(9), 575–588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Börjesson, P., Gustavsson, L., Christersson, L. and Linder, S.: 1997, ‘Future production and utilization of biomass in Sweden: Potentials and CO2 mitigation’, Biomass and Bioenergy 13(6), 399–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, A.H. and Honey, B.G.: 1994, ‘Energy and carbon dioxide implications of building construction’, Energy and Buildings 20(3), 205–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, A.H. and Levine, S.B.: 1999, ‘Wood-based building materials and atmospheric carbon emissions’, Environmental Science and Policy 2, 427–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, R.J.: 1999, ‘Energy and greenhouse gas emissions associated with the construction of alternative structural systems’, Building and Environment 34(3), 335–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, R.J. and Kernan, P.C.: 1996, ‘Life-cycle energy use in office buildings’, Building and Environment 31(4), 307–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dornburg, V.: 2004, Multi-functional Biomass Systems. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Science, Technology and Society, Utrecht University, The Netherlands.

  • European Commission: 2003, European Union Energy and Transport in Figures. EU Publications Office, Luxembourg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fossdal, S.: 1995, Energi- og Miljó regnskap for bygg (Energy and Environmental Accounts of Building Construction). Report 173, The Norwegian Institute of Building Research, Oslo (in Norwegian).

  • Gajda, J.: 2001, Absorption of Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide by Portland Cement Concrete. R&D Serial No. 2255a, Portland Cement Association, Skokie IL, USA.

  • Gustavsson, L., Börjesson, P., Johansson, B. and Svenningsson, P.: 1995, ‘Reducing CO2 emissions by substituting biomass for fossil fuels’, Energy 20(11), 1097–1113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gustavsson, L. and Johansson, B.: 1994, ‘Cogeneration: One way to use biomass efficiently’, Heat Recovery Systems and CHP 14(2), 117–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gustavsson, L., Karjalainen, T., Marland, G., Savolainen, I., Schlamadinger, B. and Apps, M.: 2000, ‘Project-based greenhouse gas accounting: Guiding principles with a focus on baselines and additionality’, Energy Policy 28(13), 935–946.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gustavsson, L. and Karlsson, {Â}.: 2002, ‘A system perspective on the heating of detached houses’, Energy Policy 30(7), 553–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gustavsson, L. and Sathre, R.: 2005, ‘Variability in energy and carbon dioxide balances of wood and concrete building materials’, Building and Environment (in press).

  • Herzog, H., Eliasson, B. and Kaarstad, O.: 2000, ‘Capturing greenhouse gases’, Scientific American 282(2), 54–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houghton, J.T., Meira Filho, L.G., Callander, B.A., Harris, N., Kattenberg, A. and Maskell, K. (eds.): 1996. Climate Change 1995: The Science of Climate Change, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Illston, J.M. and Domone, P.L.J.: 2001, Construction Materials: Their Nature and Behaviour, London, Spon Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change): 1996, Revised 1996 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, Volume 3: Reference Manual. Web accessible at http://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/gl/invs6b.htm.

  • IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change): 2000, Land Use, Land-use Change, and Forestry. R.T. Watson et al. (eds.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change): 2001, Climate Change 2001: Synthesis Report. R.T. Watson et al. (eds.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isomäki, A.: 2004, Finnish Forest Research Institute. Personal communication.

  • Josa, A., Antonio, A., Heino, A., Byars, E. and Cardim, A.: 2004, ‘Comparative analysis of available life cycle inventories of cement in the EU’, Cement and Concrete Research 34(8), 1313–1320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kibert, C.J., Sendzamir, J. and Guy, G.B.: 2002, ‘Defining an ecology of construction’, Chpt. 1 in Construction Ecology: Nature as the Basis for Green Buildings, London, Spon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch, P.: 1992, ‘Wood versus nonwood materials in U.S. residential construction: Some energy-related global implications’, Forest Products Journal 42(5), 31–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehtonen, A., Mäkipää, R., Heikkinen, J., Sievänen, R. and Liski, J.: 2004, ‘Biomass expansion factors (BEFs) for Scots pine, Norway spruce and birch according to stand age for boreal forests’, Forest Ecology and Management 188(1–3), 211–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lippke, B., Wilson, J., Perez-Garcia, J., Boyer, J. and Meil, J.: 2004, ‘CORRIM: Life-cycle environmental performance of renewable building materials’, Forest Products Journal 54(6), 8–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liski, J., Pussinen, A., Pingoud, K., Mäkipää, R. and Karjalainen, T.: 2001, ‘Which rotation length is favourable to carbon sequestration?’, Canadian Journal of Forest Research 31, 2004–2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundborg, A.: 1998, ‘A sustainable forest fuel system in Sweden’, Biomass and Bioenergy 15(4–5), 399–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Micales, J.A. and Skog, K.E.: 1997, ‘The decomposition of forest products in landfills’, International Biodeterioration and Biodegradation 39(2–3), 145–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moomaw, W.R. and Moreira, J.R.: 2001, ‘Technological and economic potential of greenhouse gas emissions reduction’, in: B. Metz, O. Davidson, R. Swart and J. Pan (eds.), Climate Change 2001: Mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nabuurs, G.J., Pussinen, A., Karjalainen, T., Erhard, M. and Kramer, K.: 2002, ‘Increment changes in European forests due to climate change’, Global Change Biology 8, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perälä, A.-L.: 2004, ‘VTT Building and Transport’, Finland. Personal communication.

  • Persson, S.: 1998, Wälludden trähus i fem vâningar: erfarenheter och lärdomar} (Wälludden wooden building with five stories: Experiences and knowledge acquired}). Report TVBK-3032, Department of Structural Engineering, Lund Institute of Technology. (in Swedish)

  • Pingoud, K.: 2001, ‘Fossil carbon emissions associated with carbon flows of harvested wood products’, in: B. Schlamadinger, S. Woess-Gallasch and A. Cowie (eds.), Proceedings of the IEA Bioenergy Task25/38 workshop “Carbon Accounting and Emissions Trading Related to Bioenergy, Wood Products and Carbon Sequestration”, 26–30 March 2001 in Canberra, Australia. Joanneum Research, Graz. Web accessible at http://www.joanneum.ac.at/iea-bioenergy-task38/workshops/canberra01/canberra.pdf.

  • Pingoud, K. and Lehtilä, A.: 2002, ‘Fossil carbon emissions associated with carbon flows of wood products’, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 7(1), 63–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pingoud, K. and Perälä, A.-L.: 2000, Studies on Greenhouse Impacts of Wood Construction. 1. Scenario Analysis of Potential Wood Utilisation in Finnish New Construction in 1990 and 1994. 2. Inventory of Carbon Stock of Wood Products in the Finnish Building Stock in 1980, 1990 and 1995. Publication 840, Technical Research Centre of Finland, VTT Julkaisuja, Espoo (in Finnish, abstract in English) Web accessible at http://www.inf.vtt.fi/pdf/julkaisut/2000/J840.pdf.

  • Richter, K.: 1998, ‘Life cycle assessment of wood products’, in G.H. Kohlmaier, M. Weber and R.A. Houghton, (eds.), Carbon Dioxide Mitigation in Forestry and Wood Industry, Berlin, Springer-Verlag, pp. 219–248.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Scharai-Rad, M. and Welling, J.: 2002, Environmental and energy balances of wood products and substitutes, Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations. Web accessible at http://www.fao.org/docrep/004/y3609e/y3609e00.htm.

  • Schlamadinger, B., Apps, M., Bohlin, F., Gustavsson, L., Jungmeier, G., Marland, G., Pingoud, K. and Savolainen, I.: 1997, ‘Towards a standard methodology for greenhouse gas balances of bioenergy systems in comparison with fossil energy systems’, Biomass and Bioenergy 13(6), 359–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlamadinger, B. and Marland, G.: 1996, ‘The role of forest and bioenergy strategies in the global carbon cycle’, Biomass and Bioenergy 10(5/6), 275–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheuer, C., Keoleian, G.A. and Reppe, P.: 2003, ‘Life cycle energy and environmental performance of a new university building: Modelling challenges and design implications’, Energy and Buildings 35(10), 1049–1064.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thormark, C.: 2001, ‘Conservation of energy and natural resources by recycling building waste’, Resources, Conservation and Recycling 33(2), 113–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNECE/FAO: 2000, Temperate and Boreal Forest Resources Assessment. Web accessible at http://www.unece.org/trade/timber/fra/welcome.htm.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Ecotechnology, Mid Sweden University, SE-831 25, Östersund, Sweden

    Leif Gustavsson & Roger Sathre

  2. Finnish Forest Research Institute, Unioninkatu 40 A, FIN, 00170, Helsinki, Finland

    Kim Pingoud

  3. VTT Processes, Espoo, Finland

    Kim Pingoud

Authors
  1. Leif Gustavsson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kim Pingoud
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Roger Sathre
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leif Gustavsson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gustavsson, L., Pingoud, K. & Sathre, R. Carbon Dioxide Balance of Wood Substitution: Comparing Concrete- and Wood-Framed Buildings. Mitig Adapt Strat Glob Change 11, 667–691 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-006-7207-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-006-7207-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation