Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Breast cancer metastasis to bone: evaluation of bioluminescent imaging and microSPECT/CT for detecting bone metastasis in immunodeficient mice

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Clinical & Experimental Metastasis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study sought to determine if weekly X-ray exposure affected breast cancer cell metastasis to bone and to also evaluate the use of bioluminescent imaging (BLI) and microSPECT for detection of metastatic bone lesions. Five week old nude mice were randomly assigned to the CT exposed (= 7) and no CT exposure (= 6) treatment groups. Mice received an intracardiac injection of MDA-MB-435 human breast cancer cells transduced with luciferase, or a sham injection (saline). The CT exposed group of mice received CT irradiation once a week for 5 weeks. All mice underwent weekly BLI and select mice received Tc-99m-MDP followed by microSPECT imaging after 5 weeks. Pathological evaluation and histomorphometry were used to assess the affect of CT X-rays on bone metastasis and to evaluate BLI. BLI results found no significant difference in metastasis between animals that received CT and those that did not (> 0.05); however, histomorphometry of the knee joints revealed a significant increase (= 0.029) in tumor area of the leg bones in mice that received CT exposure (60% ± 7%) compared to animals that did not receive CT scans (33% ± 8%). Compared to histological analysis, BLI of the leg and spine was determined to have excellent sensitivity (100%), good specificity (80–90%) and accuracy (90–96%), a positive predictive value of 81–93% and a 100% negative predictive value. Thus, multi-modality imaging techniques can be very useful for monitoring bone metastasis, however microCT X-rays should be used judiciously in order to limit irradiation that may stimulate increased metastasis to specific regions of the skeleton. MicroSPECT imaging did not detect metastatic lesions in the legs of these young nude mice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hamaoka T, Madewell JE, Podoloff DA, Hortobagyi GN, Ueno NT (2004) Bone imaging in metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 22:2942–2953

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Fidler IJ (2003) The pathogenesis of cancer metastasis: the ‘seed and soil’ hypothesis revisited. Nature Rev 3:1–6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Yoneda T, Sasaki A, Mundy GR (1994) Osteolytic bone metastasis in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 32:73–84

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Harms JF, Welch DR (2003) MDA-MB-435 human breast carcinoma metastasis to bone. Clin Exp Metastasis 20:327–334

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Phadke PA, Mercer RR, Harms JF, Jia Y, Frost AR, Jewell JL, Bussard KM, Nelson S, Moore C, Kappes JC, Gay CV, Mastro AM, Welch DR (2006) Kinetics of metastatic breast cancer cell trafficking in bone. Clin Cancer Res 12:1431–1440

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Drake JM, Gabriel CL, Henry MD (2005) Assessing tumor growth and distribution in a model of prostate cancer metastasis using bioluminescence imaging. Clin Exp Metastasis 22:674–684

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Jenkins DE, Oei Y, Horning YS, Yu SF, Dusich J, Purchio T, Contag PR (2003) Bioluminescent imaging (BLI) to improve and refine traditional murine models of tumor growth and metastasis. Clin Exp Metastasis 20:733–744

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Jenkins DE, Hornig YS, Oei Y, Dusich J, Purchio T (2005) Bioluminescent human breast cancer cell lines that permit rapid and sensitive in vivo detection of mammary tumors and multiple metastases in immune deficient mice. Breast Cancer Res 7:R444–R454

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Okamoto M, Yonekawa H (2005) Intestinal tumorigenesis in Min mice is enhanced by X-irradiation in an age-dependent manner. J Radiat Res (Tokyo) 46:83–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen W, Wu X, Levasseur DN, Liu H, Lai L, Kappes JC, Townes TM (2000) Lentiviral vector transduction of hematopoietic stem cells that mediate long-term reconstitution of lethally irradiated mice. Stem Cells 18:352–359

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Naldini L, Blomer U, Gallay P, Ory D, Mulligan R, Gage FH, Verma IM, Trono D (1996) In vivo gene delivery and stable transduction of nondividing cells by a lentiviral vector. Science 272:263–267

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Harms JF, Welch DR, Samant RS et al (2004) A small molecule antagonist of the alpha(v)beta3 integrin suppresses MDA-MB-435 skeletal metastasis. Clin Exp Metastasis 21:119–128

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. McElroy D, MacDonald L, Beekman F, Wang Y, Patt B, Iwanczyk J, Tsui B, Hoffman E (2002) Performance evaluation of A-SPECT: a high resolution desktop pinhole SPECT system for imaging small animals. IEE Transact Nuclear Sci 49:2139–2146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang L, Iwatal K, Vandehei T, Zhou H, Li J, Patt B, Parnham K, Hwang A, Hasegawa B (2005) Radiotracer quantification with in vivo preclinical microspect/CT. Mol Imaging Biol 7:166

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bakerman S (2002) Bakerman’s ABS’c of interpretive laboratory data. Interpretive Laboratory Data, Inc. Scottsdale, AZ

    Google Scholar 

  16. Han LJ, Au-Yong TK, Tong WC, Chu KS, Szeto LT, Wong CP (1998) Comparison of bone single-photon emission tomography and planar imaging in the detection of vertebral metastases in patients with back pain Eur J Nucl Med 25:635–638

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ritman EL (2004) Micro-computed tomography-current status and developments Annu Rev Biomed Eng 6:185–208

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Savelli G, Maffioli L, Maccauro M, Deckere EDE, Bombardieri E (2001) Bone scintigraphy and the added value of SPECT (single photon emission tomography) in detecting skeletal lesions Q. J Nucl Med 45:27–37

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Blankenberg FG, Strauss HW (2002) Nuclear medicine applications in molecular imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 16:352–361

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Wang CY, Chang YW (1997) A model for osseous metastasis of human breast cancer established by intrafemur injection of the MDA-MB-435 cells in nude mice. Anticancer Res 17:2471–2474

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are indebted to the superb technical assistance from Dr. Arig Ibrahim Hashim, as well as Patty Lott and Dezhi Wang at the University of Alabama at Birmingham Center for Metabolic Bone Disease Histomorphometry Core Facility, P30AR046031. This project was made possible by Grant Number R21AT01636 to R.W.H. from the National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NCCAM). Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the NCCAM, or the National Institutes of Health. This study was also supported by the National Institutes of Health grants, T32AR047512 to S.C., RO1-CA108585, RO1-CA93796 to G.P.S. and 5P30CA013148-35, Small Animal Imaging Shared Facility to K.R.Z.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. W. Hardy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cowey, S., Szafran, A.A., Kappes, J. et al. Breast cancer metastasis to bone: evaluation of bioluminescent imaging and microSPECT/CT for detecting bone metastasis in immunodeficient mice. Clin Exp Metastasis 24, 389–401 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10585-007-9076-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10585-007-9076-8

Keywords

Navigation