Skip to main content
Log in

A twelve year analysis of non-tubal ectopic pregnancies: Do the clinical manifestations and risk factor for these rare pregnancies differ from those of tubal pregnancies?

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Gynecological Surgery

Abstract

The aim of this study was to analyze the characteristics and peculiarity of non-tubal ectopic (NTE) pregnancy presenting to a major district hospital in London, UK. Data were collected between January 2003 and July 2014. There were 850 cases of ectopic pregnancies (798 tubal pregnancies and 53 NTE pregnancies). Forty-seven of the NTE were included in the study. Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics 20. Pearson’s chi-squared analysis was used to compare statistical significance of the data collected; the level of statistical significance at which the null hypothesis was rejected was chosen as 0.05. The 31–40 year age group had the highest incidence (55 % of the cohort). Thirty-seven percent of NTE were primigravida. Most of the women presented at 6–10 weeks gestation (63 %) with abdominal and vaginal bleeding being the most common presentation in 55 % of cases. When compared with tubal ectopic pregnancy, NTE was more likely to present at later gestation of presentation (p = 0.000), have history of assisted reproduction (p = 0.041) and more likely to present with diarrhoea, shoulder-tip pain and syncopal attack as well having a significant amount of haemoperitoneum at surgery compared with tubal ectopic pregnancy. NTE pregnancies are likely to present most commonly at 6–10 weeks and therefore clinicians should have a high index of suspicion when treating any pregnant woman at this gestation. The later presentation of NTE pregnancies may relate to the delay in diagnosis of these rarer ectopic pregnancies; this may be attributed to the clinician having a level of suspicion that is too low, as the incidence of NTE pregnancies is becoming increasingly common. A combination of a thorough history with the presence of specific risk factors such as a history of assisted conception, pelvic surgery and pelvic inflammatory disease and symptoms such as syncope and an abnormal amount of free fluid behind the empty uterus at ultrasound should make the clinician highly suspicious of a NTE or heterotopic pregnancy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Knez J (2014) Ultrasound imaging in the management of bleeding and pain in early pregnancy Best Practice and Research. Clin Obstet Gynaecol 28(5):621–636

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alkatout I, Honemeyer U, Strauss A, Tinelli A, Malvasi A, Jonat W, Mettler L, Schollmeyer T (2013) Clinical diagnosis and treatment of ectopic pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Surv 68(8):571–581

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Verma U, English D, Brookfield K (2011) Conservative management of non-tubal ectopic pregnancies. Fertil Steril 96(6):1391–1395

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Office of National statistics (2011) Live Births in England and Wales by characteristics of mother 1, 2010

  5. Shan N, Dong D, Deng W, Fu Y (2014) Unusual ectopic pregnancies: a retrospective analysis of 65 cases. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 40:147–154

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Yao B, Chen R (1997) Clinical analysis of unusual ectopic pregnancies. A report of 27 cases. Chin J Pract Gynecol Obstet 13:33–35

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chetty M, Elson J (2009) Treating non-tubal ectopic pregnancy. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 23:529–538

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Centre for disease control and prevention (Nov 2009) 2008 sexually transmitted disease surveillance

  9. Lozeau AM, Potter B (2005) Diagnosis and management of ectopic pregnancy. Am Fam Phys 72(9):1707–1714

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rimdusit P, Kasatri N (1976) Primary ovarian pregnancy and intrauterine contraceptive device. Obstet Gynaecol 48:57–59

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kakade A (2012) Ovarian ectopic pregnancy: varied clinical presentations- 3 case reports and review of literature. Indian J Basic Appl Med Res 3(1):242–244

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lehefeldt H, Tietze C, Gorstein F (1970) Ovarian pregnancy and the intrauterine device. Am J Obstet Gynaecol 108:1005–1009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kirk EAB, Bottomley C, Bourne T (2014) Diagnosing ectopic pregnancy and current concepts in the management of the pregnancy of unknown location. Hum Reprod 20(2):250–261

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Odejinmi F, Rizzuto MI, Macrae R, Olowu O, Hussain M (2009) Diagnosis and laparoscopic management of 12 consecutive cases of ovarian pregnancy and review of literature. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 16(3):354–359

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Habbu J, Read MD (2006) Ovarian pregnancy successfully treated with methotrexate. J Obstet Gynaecol 26(6):587–588

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Compliance with ethical standards

This article does not contain any studies with the human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Conflict of interest

We declare that none of the authors have a conflict of interest.

Authors’ contribution

Alalade contributed in project development, data collection, data analysis, manuscript writing and editing.

Mayers contributed in data analysis and manuscript writing.

Abdulrahman contributed in data analysis and manuscript writing.

Oliver contributed in data collection and data analysis.

Odejinmi contributed in project development, data collection, manuscript writing and editing.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kate Mayers.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alalade, A., Mayers, K., Abdulrahman, G. et al. A twelve year analysis of non-tubal ectopic pregnancies: Do the clinical manifestations and risk factor for these rare pregnancies differ from those of tubal pregnancies?. Gynecol Surg 13, 103–109 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10397-015-0917-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10397-015-0917-1

Keywords

Navigation