Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Assemblages of wood-inhabiting fungi related to silvicultural management intensity in beech forests in southern Germany

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Journal of Forest Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Current silvicultural treatments in beech forests are aimed at achieving thick logs without discoloured hardwood. Therefore intensive thinning is applied already in younger stands with the objective of large-sized trunks at an age of 100 years. However, this approach bears the risk that dead wood structures and broken trees are completely removed from the forest. The impact of three different silvicultural management intensity levels on wood-inhabiting fungi over decades was investigated in a large beech forest (>10,000 ha) in southern Germany in 69 sampling plots: A Intensive Thinning and Logging with high-value trees, B Conservation-Oriented Logging with integration of special structures such as dead wood and broken trees and C Strict Forest Reserves with no logging for 30 years. The analysis of community showed marked differences in the fungus species composition of the three treatments, independent of stand age. The relative frequencies of species between treatments were statistically different. Indicator species for naturalness were more abundant at sites with low silvicultural management intensity. Fomes fomentarius, the most common fungus in virgin forests and strict forest reserves, is almost missing in forests with high-management intensity. The species richness seemed to be lower where intensive thinning was applied (P = 0.051). Species characteristic for coarse woody debris were associated to low management intensity, whereas species with a significant preference for stumps became more frequent with increasing management intensity. A total amount of dead wood higher than 60 m3/ha was found to enable significantly higher numbers of species indicators of naturalness (P = 0.013). In conclusion, when applying intensive silvicultural treatment, the role of dead wood needs to be actively considered in order to maintain the natural biocoenosis of beech forests.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Achtziger R, Nigmann U, Zwölfer H (1992) Rarefaction-Methoden und ihre Einsatzmöglichkeiten bei der zooökologischen Zustandsanalysen und Bewertung von Biotopen. Zeitschr Ökol Nat 1:89–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Albrecht L (1991) Die Bedeutung des toten Holzes im Wald. Forstw Cbl 110:106–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Bader P, Jansson S, Jonsson BG (1995) Wood-inhabiting fungi and substratum decline in selectively logged boreal spruce forests. Biol Conserv 72:355–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BayFORKLIM (1996) Klimaatlas von Bayern. bayerischer klimaforschungsverbund, c/o metereologisches institut der universität münchen, München

  • Blaschke M, Hahn C, Helfer W (2004) Die Pilzflora der bayerischen Naturwaldreservate. LWF Wissen 43:5–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley RK, Albee S (1996) The effects of silvicultural treatments on occurence of mycorrhizal sporocarps in a Pinus contorta forest: a preliminary study. Biol Conserv 78:313–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bütler R, Angelstam P, Ekelund P, Schlaepfer R (2004) Dead wood threshold values for the three-toed woodpecker presence in boreal and sub-Alpine forest. Biol Conserv 119:305–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen M, Hahn K, Mountford EP, Ódor P, Standóvar T, Rozenbergar D, Diaci J, Wijdeven S, Meyer P, Winter S, Vrska T (2005) Dead wood in European beech (Fagus sylvatica) forest reserves. For Ecol Manage 210:267–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derbsch H, Schmitt JA (1987) Atlas der Pilze des Saarlandes; Teil 2: Nachweise, Ökologie, Vorkommen und Beschreibungen. Natur und Landschaft im Saarland, Sonderband 3

  • Hahn C, Blaschke M (2005) Ökologische Studie von Rindenpilzen und Porlingen an Totholz in einem Naturwaldreservat und forstlich bewirtschafteten Vergleichsflächen. AFJZ 176:161–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilmann-Clausen J, Christensen M (2004) Does size matter?—On the importance of various dead wood fractions for fungal diversity in Danish beech forests. For Ecol Manage 201:105–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilmann-Clausen J, Christensen M (2005) Wood-inhabiting macrofungi in Danish beech-forests—conflicting diversity patterns and their implications in a conservation perspective. Biol Conserv 122:633–642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hothorn T, Hornik K (2005) The coin Package—Conditional inference procedures in a permutation test framework. Cran.r-project.org

  • Jahn H (1990) Pilze an Bäumen. Patzer Verlag, Berlin-Hannover

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonsell M, Nordlander G (2002) Insects in polypore fungi as indicator species: a comparison between forest sites differing in amounts and continuity of dead wood. For Ecol Manage 157:101–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonsell M, Nordlander G (2004) Host selection patterns in insects breeding in bracket fungi. Ecol Entomol 29:697–705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Junninen K, Smilä M, Kouki J, Kotiranta H (2006) Assemblages of wood-inhabiting fungi along the gradients of succession and naturalness in boreal pine-dominated forests in Fennoscandia. Ecography 29:75–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knoke T (2002) Value of complete information on red heartwood formation in Beech (Fagus sylvatica L.). Silvae Fenn 36:841–851

    Google Scholar 

  • Kölbel M (1999) Totholz in Naturwaldreservaten und Urwäldern. LWF aktuelle 18:2–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Kost G (1991) Zur ökologie und bioindikatorfunktion von pilzarten in einigen bannwäldern baden-württembergs, nebst vorschlägen zum artenschutz von Pilzen. Schriftenr für Vegetationskunde 21:161–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Kriegelsteiner J (2000) Die Großpilze Baden-Württembergs, Bd. 1. Ulmer-Verlag, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Lausen B, Schumacher M (1992) Maximally selected rank statistics. Biometrics 48:73–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindhe A, Asenblad N, Toresson HG (2004) Cut logs and high stumps of spruce, birch, aspen and oak—nine years of saproxylic fungi succession. Biol Conserv 119:443–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McComb W, Lindenmayer DB (1999) Dying, dead, and down trees. In: Hunter ML (eds) Maintaining biodiversity in forest ecosystems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 335–372

    Google Scholar 

  • McCune B, Mefford MJ (1999) Multivariate analysis of ecological data. MjM Software, Gleneden Beach, USA

  • Müller J (2005a) Wie beeinflusst Forstwirtschaft die Biodiversität in Wäldern? Eine Analyse anhand der xylobionten Käfer (Insecta: Coleoptera). Beiträge zur bayerischen Entomofaunistik 7:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller J (2005b) Waldstrukturen als Steuergröße für Artengemeinschaften in kollinen bis submontanen Buchenwäldern. Dissertation der Technischen Universität München, Lehrstuhl für Waldwachstumskunde. http://www.mediatum.ub.tum.de

  • Müller J, Hothorn T (2004) Maximally selected two-sample statistics as a new tool for the identification and assessment of habitat factors with an application to breeding-bird communities in oak forests. Eur J For Res 123:219–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller J, Strätz C, Hothorn T (2005) Habitat factors for land snails in acid beech forests with a special focus on coarse woody debris. Eur J For Res 124:233–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller J (2004) Welchen Beitrag leisten Naturwaldreservate zum Schutz von waldvogelarten. Ornithol Anz 43:3–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuss V (1999) Mykologischer Vergleich zwischen Naturschutzgebieten und Forstflächen. IHW-Verlag, München

    Google Scholar 

  • Ódor P, Heilmann-Clausen J, Christensen M, Aude E, van Dort KW, Piltaver A, Siller I, Veerkamp MT, Walleyn R, Standóvar T, van Hees AFM, Kosec J, Matocec N, Kraigher H, Grebenc T (2006) Diversity of dead wood inhabiting fungi and bryophytes in semi-natural beech forests in Europe. Biol Conserv 131:58–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Økland B, Bakke A, Hagvar S, Kvamme T (1996) What factors influence diversity of saproxylic beetles? A multiscaled study from a spruce forest in southern Norway. Biodivers Conserv 5:75–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penttilä R, Siitonen J, Kuusinen M (2004) Polypore diversity in managed and old-growth boreal Picea abies forests in southern Finland. Biol Conserv 117:271–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2005) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org

  • Ranius T, Heding J (2001) The dispersal rate of a beetle, Osmoderma eremita, living in tree hollows. Oecologia 126:363–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlechte G (2002) Sukzession holzzerstörender Pilze auf der Sturmwurffläche. Naturwaldreservate in Hessen 8:61–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid H, Helfer W (1999) Die Bedeutung der Naturwaldreservate für den Pilzartenschutz. Seminarber NUA 4:140–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt O (2006) Totes holz voller Leben. LWF aktuell 53:1

    Google Scholar 

  • Shinozaki K (1963) Note on the species-area curve. In: Proceedings of the 10th annual meeting of the ecological society Japan. Tokyo

  • Sippola A-L, Similä M, Mönkkönen M, Jokimäki J (2004) Diversity of polyporous fungi (Polyporaceae) in northern boreal forests: effects of forest type and logging intensity. Scand J For Res 19:152–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ssymank A, Hauke U, Rückriem C, Schröder F (1998) Das Europäische Schutzgebietssystem NATURA 2000. Schriftenr f Landschaftspfl u Naturschutz 53:1–560

    Google Scholar 

  • Ter Braak CJF, Smilauer P (2002) CANOCO reference manual and CanoDraw for windows user’s guide: software for canonical community ordination (Version 4.5). Microcomputer Power, Ithaca

    Google Scholar 

  • Utschick H, Helfer W (2003) Vergleichende ökologische Untersuchungen mittelschwäbischer Pilzzönosen in Wäldern unterschiedlicher Naturnähe. Ber. d. Bay. Akad f Natursch u Landschaftspflege (ANL) 27:115–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Walentowski H, Ewald J, Fischer A, Kölling C, Türk W (2004) Handbuch der natürlichen Waldgesellschaften in Bayern. Geobotanica, Freising

  • Walentowski H, Gulder HJ, Kölling C, Ewald J, Türk W (2001) Regionale natürliche Waldzusammensetzung Bayerns—Überarbeitete Fassung 2001. LWF aktuell 31: Kartenbeilage

  • Weber J (2004) Zur Entwicklung der Pilzflora von 1994–1996—Vergleichende untersuchungen von bestandesstruktur und pilzgemeinschaften. Waldschutzgebiete Baden-Württemberg 2:99–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Westphall PH, Young SS (1993) On adjusting P-values for multiplicity. Biometrics 49:941–945

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winter S, Flade M, Schumacher H, Kerstan E, Möller G (2005) The importance of near natural stand structures for the biocoenosis of lowland beech forests. For Snow Lansc Res 79:127–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter S, Schumacher H, Flade M, Möller G (2004) F+E-Vorhaben Biologische Vielfalt und Forstwirtschaft—”Naturschutzstandards für die Bewirtschaftung von Buchenwäldern im Nordostdeutschen Tiefland” Sachbericht. Bundesamt für Naturschutz, Bonn

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Bavarian State Forestry. We thank two anonymous referees who gave helpful suggestions on an earlier version of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jörg Müller.

Additional information

Communicated by Rainer Matyssek.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Müller, J., Engel, H. & Blaschke, M. Assemblages of wood-inhabiting fungi related to silvicultural management intensity in beech forests in southern Germany. Eur J Forest Res 126, 513–527 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-007-0173-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-007-0173-7

Keywords

Navigation