Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comment accéder à la voie biliaire principale après échec d’un cathétérisme standard : mise au point sur les différentes techniques alternatives de cathétérisme biliaire

How to access the common bile duct after failure of standard canulation: Focusing on different alternative techniques of biliary canulation

  • Mise au Point / Update
  • Published:
Acta Endoscopica

Résumé

Le cathétérisme standard permet l’accès à la voie biliaire principale (VBP) dans 80–95 % des cas. Quelle que soit l’expertise de l’endoscopiste, dans 20 % des cas, l’accès à la VBP est jugé difficile. Le but de cette revue de la littérature est de définir les causes d’un cathétérisme difficile de la VBP et de donner les différentes techniques permettant d’accéder à la VBP après échec d’un cathétérisme standard. Une revue systématique de la littérature a été réalisée en excluant les techniques de drainage biliaire par échoendoscopie.

Abstract

The standard canulation allows access to the common bile duct (CBD) in 80–95% of cases. Whatever the expertise of the endoscopist, in 20% of the cases access to the CBD is considered difficult. The purpose of this literature review is to identify the causes of a difficult canulation of the CBD and give the various techniques for accessing the CBD after failure of standard canulation. This literature review was performed excluding the techniques of biliary drainage by endoscopic ultrasound.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Références

  1. Adler DG, Baron TH, Davila RE, et al. ASGE guideline: the role of ERCP in diseases of the biliary tract and the pancreas. Gas-trointest Endosc 2005;62:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Freeman ML, Guda NM. ERCP cannulation: a review of reported techniques. Gastrointest Endosc 2005;61:112–25

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hisa T, Matsumoto R, Takamatsu M, Furutake M. Impact of changing our cannulation method on the incidence of postendoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis after pancreatic guidewire placement World J Gastroenterol 2011;17:5289–94

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Freeman ML, Di Sario JA, Nelson DB, et al. Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective, multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 2001;54:425–34

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Artifon EL, Sakai P, Cunha JE, et al. Guidewire cannulation reduces risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis and facilitates bile duct cannulation. Am J Gastroenterol 2007;102:2147–53

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Tang SJ, Haber GB, Kortan P, et al. Precut papillotomy versus persistence in difficult biliary cannulation: a prospective randomized trial. Endoscopy 2005;37:58–65

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cennamo V, Fuccio L, Repici A, et al. Timing of precut procedure does not influence success rate and complications of ERCP procedure: a prospective randomized comparative study. Gastrointest Endosc 2009;69:473–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fritsch J, Prat F, Pelletier G, Buffet C. Anomalies anatomiques de la région papillaire et pathologies biliopancréatiques. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 1999;23:717–29

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lee TH, Bang BW, Park SH, et al. Precut fistulotomy for difficult biliary cannulation: is it a risky preference in relation to the experience of an endoscopist? Dig Dis Sci 2011;56:1896–903

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lobo DN, Balfour TW, Iftikhar SY. Periampullary diverticula: consequences of failed ERCP. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1998;80:326–31

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Bourke MJ, Costamagna G, Freeman ML. Biliary cannulation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: core technique and recent innovations. Endoscopy 2009;41:612–7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Caletti GC, Vandelli A, Bolondi L, et al. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) through artificial endoscopic choledochoduodenal fistula. Endoscopy 1978;10:203–6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Siegel JH. Precut papillotomy: a method to improve success of ERCP and papillotomy. Endoscopy 1980;12:130–3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Osnes M, Kahrs T. Endoscopic choledochoduodenostomy for choledocholithiasis through choledochoduodenal fistula. Endoscopy 1977;9:162–5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Prat F. “How do I do”: precut papillotomy of Vater’s ampulla. Hepato-Gastro 2009;16:53–7

    Google Scholar 

  16. Swan MP, Alexander S, Moss A, et al. Needle knife sphincterotomy does not increase the risk of pancreatitis in patients with difficult biliary cannulation. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2013;11:430–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Navaneethan U, Konjeti R, Venkatesh PGK, et al. Early precut sphincterotomy and the risk of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography related complications: an updated meta-analysis. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2014;6:200–8

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Davee T, Garcia J, Baron TH. Precut sphincterotomy for selective biliary duct cannulation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Ann Gastroenterol 2012;25:291–302

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Dumonceau JM, Devière J, Cremer M. A new method of achieving deep cannulation of the common bile duct during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Endoscopy 1998;30:S80

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Gotoh Y, Tamada K, Tomiyama T, et al. A new method for deep cannulation of the bile duct by straightening the pancreatic duct. Gastrointest Endosc 2001;53:820–2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lee TH, Hwang SO, Choi HJ, et al. Sequential algorithm analysis to facilitate selective biliary access for difficult biliary cannulation in ERCP: a prospective clinical study. BMC Gastroenterol 2014;14:30

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Tanaka R, Itoi T, Sofuni A, et al. Is the double-guidewire technique superior to the pancreatic duct guidewire technique in cases of pancreatic duct opacification? J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2013;28:1787–93

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Xinopoulos D, Bassioukas SP, Kypreos D, et al. Pancreatic duct guidewire placement for biliary cannulation in a single-session therapeutic ERCP. World J Gastroenterol 2011;17:1989–95

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Draganov P, Devonshire DA, Cunningham JT, et al. A new technique to assist in difficult bile duct cannulation at the time of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. JSLS 2005;9:218–21

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Goff JS. Common bile duct pre-cut sphincterotomy: trans-pancreatic sphincter approach. Gastrointest Endosc 1995;41:502–5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Goff JS. Long-term experience with the transpancreatic sphincter pre-cut approach to biliary sphincterotomy. Gastrointest Endosc 1999;50:642–5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Yoo YW, Cha SW, Lee WC, et al. Double guidewire technique vs transpancreatic precut sphincterotomy in difficult biliary cannulation. World J Gastroenterol 2013;19:108–14

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Akashi R, Kiyozumi T, Jinnouchi K, et al. Pancreatic sphincter precutting to gain selective access to the common bile duct: a series of 172 patients. Endoscopy 2004;36:405–10

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ito K, Fujita N, Noda Y, et al. Can pancreatic duct stenting prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis in patients who undergo pancreatic duct guidewire placement for achieving selective biliary cannulation? A prospective randomized controlled trial. J Gastroenterol 2010;45:1183–91

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ramirez FC, Dennert B, Sanowski RA. Success of repeat ERCP by the same endoscopist. Gastrointest Endosc 1999;49:58–61

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Maeda S, Hayashi H, Hosokawa O, et al. Prospective randomized pilot trial of selective biliary cannulation using pancreatic guidewire placement. Endoscopy 2003;35:721–4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Huang CH, Tsou YK, Lin CH, Tang JH. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for intradiverticular papilla: endoclip-assisted biliary cannulation. Endoscopy 2010;42:E223–4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Myung DS, Park CH, Koh HR, et al. Cap-assisted ERCP in patients with difficult cannulation due to periampullary diverticulum. Endoscopy 2014;46:352–5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Cennamo V, Baroncini D, Fabbri C, et al. Cannulation of obscured papilla aided by using a balloon to flatten out duodenal folds, in a patient with acute pancreatitis. Endoscopy 2006;38:288

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Hôpital Saint Joseph, 26 boulevard de Louvain, F-13008, Marseille, France

    A. Laquière, A. Belle, E. Désilets, M. Barraud, P. Grandval, C. Boustière & R. Laugier

  2. Hôpital Timone, 264 rue Saint-Pierre, F-13385, Marseille cedex, France

    A. Laquière, A. Belle, E. Désilets, M. Barraud, P. Grandval, C. Boustière & R. Laugier

Authors
  1. A. Laquière
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. Belle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. E. Désilets
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. M. Barraud
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. P. Grandval
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. C. Boustière
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. R. Laugier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Laquière.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Laquière, A., Belle, A., Désilets, E. et al. Comment accéder à la voie biliaire principale après échec d’un cathétérisme standard : mise au point sur les différentes techniques alternatives de cathétérisme biliaire. Acta Endosc 46, 221–231 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10190-016-0554-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10190-016-0554-1

Mots clés

Keywords

Search

Navigation