Skip to main content
Log in

Governance, policy, and legislation of nanotechnology: a perspective

  • Technical Paper
  • Published:
Microsystem Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nanotechnology refers to technology done at nanoscale that has applications in the real world. Unique physical and chemical properties of nanomaterials can be exploited for applications that benefit society. Nanotechnology represents a “megatrend” and has become a “general purpose” technology. An executive action of 2000, the National Nanotechnology Initiative was formalized with the 21st Century Nanotechnology Research and Development Act in 2003. Through FY2015, federal R&D investment has been about $20 billion, with annual investment in FY2015 of about $1.5B, and more than double that by the private sector. The revenues from nano-enabled products continue growing, with over $200B in FY2012 in the US alone. This represents an impressive return on investment. Reauthorization of the Initiative is needed to address concerns, including emphasis on commercialization. Research on potential safety issues of nanotechnology, development of workforce, and curriculum should be continued. In this paper, we present governance, policy, and legislation of nanotechnology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

AFM:

Atomic Force Microscopy

BioMEMS:

BioMicroElectroMechanical Systems

BioNEMS:

BioNanoElectroMechanical Systems

CPSC:

Consumer Product Safety Commission

DOD:

Department of Defense

DOE:

Department of Energy

EHS:

Environmental Health and Safety

EOP:

Executive Office of the President

EPA:

Environmental Protection Agency

EU:

European Union

FDA:

Food and Drug Administration

FS:

Forestry Service

GAO:

Government Accountability Office

IC:

Intelligence Community

IWGN:

Interagency Working Group on Nanoscience, Engineering and Technology

MEMS:

MicroElectroMechanical Systems

MOEMS:

MicroOptoElectroMechanical Systems

MST:

Microsystems Technology

NACK:

Nanotechnology Applications and Career Knowledge

NASA:

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

NCMS:

National Center for Manufacturing Sciences

NEMS:

NanoElectroMechanical Systems

NIFA:

National Institute of Food and Agriculture

NIH:

National Institutes of Health

NIOSH:

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health

NIST:

National Institute of Standards and Technology

NNAP:

National Nanotechnology Advisory Panel

NNCO:

National Nanotechnology Coordination Office

NNI:

National Nanotechnology Initiative

NNIN:

National Nanotechnology Infrastructure Network

NOEMS:

NanoOptoElectroMecanical Systems

NRDA:

Nanotechnology Research and Development Act

NSET:

Subcommittee on Nanoscale Science, Engineering, and Technology

NSF:

National Science Foundation

NSIs:

Nanotechnology Signature Initiatives

NSTC:

National Science and Technology Council

OECD:

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development

OMB:

Office of Management and Budget

OSHA:

Occupational Safety and Health Administration

OSTP:

Office of Science and Technology Policy

PCAST:

President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology

R&D:

Research and Development

RF-MEMS:

Radio Frequency MicroElectroMechanical Systems

RF-NEMS:

Radio Frequency NanoElectroMechanical Systems

STM:

Scanning Tunneling Microscopy

SWNT:

Single Walled Nanotube

USDA:

US Department of Agriculture

USPTO:

US Patent and Trademark Office

References

  • Anonymous I (1999) Nanotechnology: shaping the world atom by atom, national science and technology council, committee on technology, The interagency working group on nanoscience, engineering, and technology, Washington, DC

  • Anonymous (2000) National nanotechnology initiative: leading to the next industrial revolution, national science and technology council, committee on technology, The interagency working group on nanoscience, engineering, and technology, Washington, DC

  • Anonymous (2014a) National nanotechnology initiative strategic plan, february, national science and technology council committee on technology, subcommittee on nanoscale science, engineering, and technology, Washington, DC

  • Anonymous (2014b) the national nanotechnology initiative—supplement to the president’s 2015 budget, march, the national science and technology council and the office of science & technology policy, Washington, DC

  • Anonymous (2014c) Nanomanufacturing: emergence and implications for us competitiveness, the environment, and human health, January, GAO-14-181SP, Government Accountability Office, Washington, DC

  • Anonymous (2014d) Report to the president and congress on the fifth assessment of the national nanotechnology initiative, october, president’s council of advisors on science and technology, executive office of the president, Washington, DC

  • Arora S, Porter A, Youtie J, Shapira P (2013) Capturing new developments in an emerging technology: an updated search strategy for identifying nanotechnology research outputs. Scientometrics 95:351–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhushan (2010) Springer Handbook of Nanotechnology, 3rd edn. Springer, Heidelberg

  • Bhushan (2012) Encyclopedia of nanotechnology, vol 1–4, p 2868, Springer, Heidelberg

  • Bhushan B (2015) Perspective: science and technology policy—what is at stake and why should scientists participate? Sci Pub Policy. doi:10.1093/scipol/scv005

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bhushan B, Luo D, Schricker SR, Sigmund W, Zauscher S (2014) Handbook of nanomaterials properties, vol 1–2, p 1464, Springer, Heidelberg

  • Chen RJ, Choi HC, Bangsaruntip S, Yenilmex E, Tang X, Wang Q, Chang YL, Dai H (2004) An investigation of the mechanisms of electrode sensing of protein adsorption on carbon nanotube devices. J Am Chem Soc 126:1563–1568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen H, Roco MC, Son J, Jiang S, Larson CA, Gao Q (2013) Global nanotechnology development from 1991 to 2012: patents, scientific publications, and the effect of NSF funding. J Nanopart Res 15:1–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Crone WC (2006) Bringing nano to the public: a collaboration opportunity for researchers and museums—NISE network. Science Museums of Minnesota, Minneapolis

    Google Scholar 

  • Feynman RP (1960) There’s plenty of room at the bottom. Eng Sci 23:22–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Flynn H (2014) Nanotechnology update: corporations up their spending as revenues for nano-enabled products increase, Lux research

  • Hornbeck LJ (1999) Digital light processing update—status and future applications. SPIE 3634:158–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Irvine DJ (2011) Drug delivery: one nanoparticle, one kill. Nat Mater 10:342–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Y, Arora S, Youtie J, Shapira P, Carley S (2014) Program on nanotechnology research and innovation system assessment, march, georgia institute of technology, Atlanta, Georgia. analysis of publication records of articles indexed in ThomsonReuters web of science (SCI, SSCI, and A&HI)

  • Lorengo J (2013) Nanotechnology-related patenting: USPTO & global statistics, Presented at the 2013 Nanobusiness commercialization association annual meeting in Philadelphia, PA, Oct 2013

  • Madou MJ (2011) Fundamentals of microfabrication and nanotechnology, 3rd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehta, M. (2015) 2014 NCMS Study of nanotechnology in the US manufacturing industry, National Center For Manufacturing Sciences (NCMS), Ann Arbor, Michigan (Unpublished data)

  • National Research Council (2013a) Triennial review of the national nanotechnology initiative. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (2013b) Research progress on environmental, health, and safety aspects of engineering materials. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • NIOSH (2009) Approaches to safe nanotechnology—managing the health and safety concerns associated with engineering nanomaterials, Cincinnati, OH: US department of health and human services, Centers for disease control and prevention, National Institute for occupational safety and health, DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 2009–125

  • NIOSH (2013a) Current strategies for engineering controls in nanomaterial production and downstream handling processes, Cincinnati, OH: US Department of health and human services, Centers for disease control and prevention, National Institute for occupational safety and health, DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 2014–102

  • NIOSH (2013b) Protecting the nanotechnology workforce: NIOSH nanotechnology research and guidance strategic plan, 2013–2016, Cincinnati, OH: US Department of health and human services, Centers for disease control and prevention, National institute for occupational safety and health, DHHS (NIOSH) Publication 2014–106

  • Roco MC (2011) The long view of nanotechnology development: the national nanotechnology initiative at 10 years. J Nanopart Res 13:427–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roco M (2014) NSF and long-view for nanotechnology development, presented at the tenth international nanotechnology conference on communication and cooperation (INC10), NIST, Gaithersburg, Maryland, May 13, 2014

  • Roco MC, Bainbridge WS (2013) The new world of discovery, invention, and innovation: convergence of knowledge, technology, and society. J Nanopart Res 15:1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sargent JF Jr (2013) Nanotechnology: a policy primer, report #rl34511, congressional research service, US Congress, Washington, DC (Internal Document)

  • Srivastava D (2004) Computational nanotechnology of carbon nanotubes. In: Meyyappan M (ed) Carbon nanotubes: science and applications. CRC, Boca Raton, pp 25–36

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • van der Wiel WG, De Franceschi S, Elzerman JM, Fugisawa T, Tarucha S, Kauwenhoven LP (2003) Electron transport through double quantum dots. Rev Mod Phys 75:1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White KS, Carrey JP (2011) Working with congress: a scientist’s guide to policy. AAAS, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitman L (2015) White house office of science and technology policy. Personal communication, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author served as an ASME Science and Technology Policy Fellow for the Subcommittee on Research and Technology, Committee on Science, Space, and Technology in the US Congress in 2013–2014. The paper is based in part on his participation on nanotechnology policy and legislation during his fellowship period. He thanks the staff and legislators on the committee for broad education in science and public policy. The paper is based in part on a keynote talk titled “Governance of Nanotechnology and the Legislation in Preparation,” given by the author at the 2014 NSF Nanoscale Science and Engineering Grantees Conference in Arlington, VA in December 2014. This paper is dedicated to two individuals: Dr. Mihail C. Roco, Senior Advisor for Nanotechnology at the NSF, who has contributed immensely in R&D administration and being a champion for nanotechnology since its inception, and Dr. Thomas Kalil, Deputy Director for Technology and Innovation at the OSTP, who has ably guided US technology policy to benefit science and the economy.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bharat Bhushan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bhushan, B. Governance, policy, and legislation of nanotechnology: a perspective. Microsyst Technol 21, 1137–1155 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00542-015-2511-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00542-015-2511-x

Keywords

Navigation