Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Multicenter, randomized single-port versus multiport laparoscopic surgery (SIMPLE) trial in colon cancer: an interim analysis

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Single-port laparoscopic surgery (SPLS) was recently introduced as an innovative minimally invasive surgery method. Retrospective studies have revealed the safety and feasibility of SPLS for colon cancer treatment. However, no prospective randomized trials have been performed. The multicenter, randomized SIMPLE (single-port versus multiport laparoscopic surgery) trial aimed to investigate short-term perioperative outcomes of SPLS for colon cancer treatment, compared with multiport laparoscopic surgery (MPLS).

Methods

Between August 2011 and April 2014, a total of 194 patients with colon cancer were recruited from seven hospitals in Korea. Patients were randomly allocated into the SPLS group (n = 99) or MPLS group (n = 95). The primary endpoint was postoperative complications. Operative, postoperative, and pathologic outcomes were analyzed after 50% of the patient study population had been recruited.

Results

The patients’ demographic characteristics, operative times, estimated blood volume losses, numbers of harvested lymph nodes, and lengths of both resection margins were not significantly different between groups. In the SPLS group, the rates of conversion to MPLS and open surgery were 12.9 and 2.2%, respectively. Postoperative complications occurred in 10.8% of the SPLS, and 12.5% of the MPLS patients (p = 0.714). Times to functional recovery, pain scores, and amounts of analgesia were similar between groups.

Conclusion

The results of this interim analysis suggested that SPLS is technically safe and appropriate when used for radical resection of colon cancer. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01480128).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350:2050–2059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Buunen M, Veldkamp R, Hop WC, Kuhry E, Jeekel J, Haglind E, Pahlman L, Cuesta MA, Msika S, Morino M, Lacy A, Bonjer HJ (2009) Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial. Lancet Oncol 10:44–52. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(1008)70310-70313 Epub 72008 Dec 70313

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bagshaw PF, Allardyce RA, Frampton CM, Frizelle FA, Hewett PJ, McMurrick PJ, Rieger NA, Smith JS, Solomon MJ, Stevenson AR (2012) Long-term outcomes of the australasian randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and conventional open surgical treatments for colon cancer: the Australasian Laparoscopic Colon Cancer Study trial. Ann Surg 256:915–919

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kuhry E, Schwenk WF, Gaupset R, Romild U, Bonjer HJ (2008) Long-term results of laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD003432.pub2

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Arezzo A, Scozzari G, Famiglietti F, Passera R, Morino M (2013) Is single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy safe? Results of a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 27:2293–2304. doi:10.1007/s00464-00012-02763-00469 Epub 02013 Jan 00426

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Antoniou SA, Koch OO, Antoniou GA, Lasithiotakis K, Chalkiadakis GE, Pointner R, Granderath FA (2014) Meta-analysis of randomized trials on single-incision laparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy. Am J Surg 207:613–622. doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.1007.1045 Epub 2013 Nov 1019

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bucher P, Pugin F, Morel P (2009) Single-port access laparoscopic radical left colectomy in humans. Dis Colon Rectum 52:1797–1801. doi:10.1007/DCR.1790b1013e3181b1551ce

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Choi SI, Lee KY, Park SJ, Lee SH (2010) Single port laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with D3 dissection for advanced colon cancer. World J Gastroenterol 16:275–278

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Huscher CG, Mingoli A, Sgarzini G, Mereu A, Binda B, Brachini G, Trombetta S (2012) Standard laparoscopic versus single-incision laparoscopic colectomy for cancer: early results of a randomized prospective study. Am J Surg 204:115–120. doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.1009.1005 Epub 2011 Dec 1016

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Poon JT, Cheung CW, Fan JK, Lo OS, Law WL (2012) Single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic colectomy for colonic neoplasm: a randomized, controlled trial. Surg Endosc 26:2729–2734 Epub 2012 Apr 2727

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Takemasa I, Uemura M, Nishimura J, Mizushima T, Yamamoto H, Ikeda M, Sekimoto M, Doki Y, Mori M (2014) Feasibility of single-site laparoscopic colectomy with complete mesocolic excision for colon cancer: a prospective case-control comparison. Surg Endosc 28:1110–1118. doi:10.1007/s00464-00013-03284-x Epub 02013 Nov 00468

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Champagne BJ, Papaconstantinou HT, Parmar SS, Nagle DA, Young-Fadok TM, Lee EC, Delaney CP (2012) Single-incision versus standard multiport laparoscopic colectomy: a multicenter, case-controlled comparison. Ann Surg 255:66–69. doi:10.1097/SLA.1090b1013e3182378442

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kim NK, Kim YW, Han YD, Cho MS, Hur H, Min BS, Lee KY (2016) Complete mesocolic excision and central vascular ligation for colon cancer: principle, anatomy, surgical technique, and outcomes. Surg Oncol 25:252–262. doi:10.1016/j.suronc.2016.1005.1009 Epub 2016 May 1020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, de Santibanes E, Pekolj J, Slankamenac K, Bassi C, Graf R, Vonlanthen R, Padbury R, Cameron JL, Makuuchi M (2009) The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 250:187–196. doi:10.1097/SLA.1090b1013e3181b1013ca1092

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Marcello PW (2011) Single incision laparoscopic colectomy: boutique surgery or the new standard? Dis Colon Rectum 54:660–661. doi:10.1007/DCR.1000b1013e318214b318051

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ramos-Valadez DI, Ragupathi M, Nieto J, Patel CB, Miller S, Pickron TB, Haas EM (2012) Single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy: a case-matched series. Surg Endosc 26:96–102. doi:10.1007/s00464-00011-01833-00468 Epub 02011 Jul 00427

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Papaconstantinou HT, Thomas JS (2011) Single-incision laparoscopic colectomy for cancer: assessment of oncologic resection and short-term outcomes in a case-matched comparison with standard laparoscopy. Surgery 150:820–827. doi:10.1016/j.surg.2011.1007.1060

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Chen WT, Chang SC, Chiang HC, Lo WY, Jeng LB, Wu C, Ke TW (2011) Single-incision laparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a comparison of short-term surgical results. Surg Endosc 25:1887–1892. doi:10.1007/s00464-00010-01481-00464 Epub 02011 Feb 00427

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kwag SJ, Kim JG, Oh ST, Kang WK (2013) Single incision vs conventional laparoscopic anterior resection for sigmoid colon cancer: a case-matched study. Am J Surg 206:320–325. doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2012.1011.1007 Epub 2013 Apr 1016

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kim CW, Cho MS, Baek SJ, Hur H, Min BS, Kang J, Baik SH, Lee KY, Kim NK (2015) Oncologic outcomes of single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic anterior resection for sigmoid colon cancer: a propensity-score matching analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 22:924–930. doi:10.1245/s10434-10014-14039-10431 Epub 12014 Sep 10439

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Yun JA, Yun SH, Park YA, Huh JW, Cho YB, Kim HC, Lee WY (2016) Oncologic outcomes of single-incision laparoscopic surgery compared with conventional laparoscopy for colon cancer. Ann Surg 263:973–978. doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000001226

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Champagne BJ, Lee EC, Leblanc F, Stein SL, Delaney CP (2011) Single-incision vs straight laparoscopic segmental colectomy: a case-controlled study. Dis Colon Rectum 54:183–186. doi:10.1007/DCR.1000b1013e3181fd1048af

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kim SJ, Ryu GO, Choi BJ, Kim JG, Lee KJ, Lee SC, Oh ST (2011) The short-term outcomes of conventional and single-port laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer. Ann Surg 254:933–940. doi:10.1097/SLA.1090b1013e318237826b

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was funded by the Korean Society of Endoscopic and Laparoscopic Surgeons’ research grant (Grant Number D2011-49).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jun-Gi Kim.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Byung Mo Kang, Hyung Jin Kim, Bong-Hyeon Kye, Sang Chul Lee, Kil Yeon Lee, Sun Jin Park, Suk-Hwan Lee, Sang Woo Lim, Yoon Suk Lee, Ji Hoon Kim, Jinkwon Lee, Min Ki Kim, and Jun-Gi Kim have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOC 217 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kang, B.M., Kim, H.J., Kye, BH. et al. Multicenter, randomized single-port versus multiport laparoscopic surgery (SIMPLE) trial in colon cancer: an interim analysis. Surg Endosc 32, 1540–1549 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5842-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5842-0

Keywords

Navigation