Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Individualized medicine and demographic change as determining workload factors in pathology: quo vadis?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Virchows Archiv Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The advent of individualized medicine with novel guidelines, extended quality assessment as well as intensified conventional, immunohistochemical, and molecular characterization of diseases has led to a substantial increase of pathologists’ workload. Furthermore, in industrialized countries, we are facing the challenges of demographic change with an aging population. This raises the question of how pathology will be affected by these developments in the future. We extracted German population data and data on the number of board-certified physicians and pathologists from official sources. These data were reviewed in the light of data on caseload, case complexity, auxiliary diagnostic procedures, and matching patient data from a large German pathology department serving as a sector independent regional service provider. The refinement of diagnostic procedures over the last decade has resulted in a 60 % increase in slide numbers per case, doubling of immunohistochemistry procedures, and more than tripling of molecular analyses. Correlation of this development to demographics suggests that an aging population will further increase the caseload and case complexity in the coming decades since patient age is tightly linked to both parameters. This development is currently not accompanied by a sufficient increase in the number of pathologists. Our data point toward an imbalance between the increase in pathology workload and the number of pathologists. Extrapolations suggest a further aggravation of this development in the future. Thus, healthcare systems need to address this problem urgently in order to cope with these challenges.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Warth A (2009) Demografischer Wandel und die Gesundheit für Generationen: Eine Auseinandersetzung zu den bevorstehenden Zukunftsaufgaben im Gesundheitswesen. Grin, Munich

    Google Scholar 

  2. Halaweish I, Alam HB (2015) Changing demographics of the American population. The Surgical Clinics of North America 95(1):1–10. doi:10.1016/j.suc.2014.09.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Peters E, Pritzkuleit R, Beske F, Katalinic A (2010) [Demographic change and disease rates: a projection until 2050]. Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz 53(5):417–426. doi:10.1007/s00103-010-1050-y

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Biermann J, Neumann A, Hewer A, Wasem J, Erbel R, Neumann T (2010) Influence of the demographic change on hospital admissions and costs in Germany. Med Klin (Munich) 105(12):876–881. doi:10.1007/s00063-010-1152-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Pritzkuleit R, Beske F, Katalinic A (2010) Demographic change and cancer. Onkologie 33(Suppl 7):19–24. doi:10.1159/000319738

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wild S, Roglic G, Green A, Sicree R, King H (2004) Global prevalence of diabetes: estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2030. Diabetes Care 27(5):1047–1053

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Winter S, Cox GJ, Corbridge R, Chaplin AJ, Millard PR, Shah KA (2004) Effects of clinical service reorganisation on cellular pathology workload. J Clin Pathol 57(1):22–26

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wer sind wir und wenn ja, wie viele? (2012). Patho. (1):4–7

  9. Colgan TJ, Geldenhuys L (2012) The practice of pathology in Canada: decreasing pathologist supply and uncertain outcomes. Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine 136(1):90–94. doi:10.5858/arpa.2011-0188-OA

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Meijer GA, Oudejans JJ, Koevoets JJ, Meijer CJ (2009) Activity-based differentiation of pathologists’ workload in surgical pathology. Virchows Arch 454(6):623–628. doi:10.1007/s00428-009-0768-0

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Warth A, Endris V, Kriegsmann M, Stenzinger A, Penzel R, Pfarr N, Weichert W (2015) Molecular diagnostics of non-small cell lung cancer: new markers and technologies. Pathologe 36(2):154–163. doi:10.1007/s00292-015-0004-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Warth A, Endris V, Penzel R, Weichert W (2014) Molecular pathology of lung cancer. State of the art 2014. Pathologe 35(6):565–573. doi:10.1007/s00292-014-1918-y

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Endris V, Penzel R, Warth A, Muckenhuber A, Schirmacher P, Stenzinger A, Weichert W (2013) Molecular diagnostic profiling of lung cancer specimens with a semiconductor-based massive parallel sequencing approach: feasibility, costs, and performance compared with conventional sequencing. J Mol Diagn 15(6):765–775. doi:10.1016/j.jmoldx.2013.06.002

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Trotter MJ, Larsen ET, Tait N, Wright Jr JR (2009) Time study of clinical and nonclinical workload in pathology and laboratory medicine. Am J Clin Pathol 131(6):759–767. doi:10.1309/AJCP8SKO6BUJQXHD

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge Uschi Horr (Institute of Pathology, Heidelberg) for technical assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, INF 224, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany

    Arne Warth, Albrecht Stenzinger, Mindaugas Andrulis, Peter Schirmacher & Wilko Weichert

  2. Institute of Pathology, Gelsenkirchen, Germany

    Werner Schlake & Gisela Kempny

  3. Institute of Pathology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany

    Wilko Weichert

  4. National Center of Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany

    Albrecht Stenzinger & Wilko Weichert

Authors
  1. Arne Warth
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Albrecht Stenzinger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mindaugas Andrulis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Werner Schlake
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Gisela Kempny
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Peter Schirmacher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Wilko Weichert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arne Warth.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Warth, A., Stenzinger, A., Andrulis, M. et al. Individualized medicine and demographic change as determining workload factors in pathology: quo vadis?. Virchows Arch 468, 101–108 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-015-1869-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-015-1869-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation