Skip to main content
Log in

Brain responses to pictures of children in men with pedophilic disorder: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Structural and functional neuroimaging techniques have recently been used to investigate the mechanisms of sexual attraction to children, a hallmark of pedophilic disorder, and have reported many contradictory or non-replicated findings. Here, our purpose was to identify through functional magnetic resonance imaging the brain responses of 25 male outpatients with pedophilic disorder to visual stimuli depicting children (VSc) and to compare them with 24 male healthy controls matched on sexual orientation (to female or male adults), age, and handedness. No region was differentially activated across the two groups in response to VSc. However, as shown by a random-effects statistical analysis (cluster-level pFWE-corrected < 0.05), in patients with pedophilia, but not in controls, the presentation of VSc induced a bilateral activation in the lateral occipital and temporal cortices, in particular in the right inferior temporal gyrus, as well as an activation in the declive of the cerebellar vermis. In addition, in patients the level of bilateral activation in the above-mentioned regions was positively correlated with ratings of perceived sexual arousal elicited by VSc. These results implicate these regions as possible candidate areas mediating sexual arousal in patients with pedophilic disorder.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Figures were produced by using SPM software

Fig. 2

Figures were produced by using SPM software

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barth J, Bermetz L, Heim E, Trelle S, Tonia T (2013) The current prevalence of child sexual abuse worldwide: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Public Health 58:469–483. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-012-0426-1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kendler KS, Bulik CM, Silberg JS, Hettema JM, Myers J, Prescott CA (2000) Childhood sexual abuse and adult psychiatric and substance use disorders in women. An epidemiological and cotwin control analysis. Arch Gen Psychiatry 57:953–959

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Nelson EC, Heath AC, Madden PA, Cooper ML, Dinwiddie SH, Bucholz KK et al (2002) Association between self-reported childhood sexual abuse and adverse psychosocial outcomes: results from a twin study. Arch Gen Psychiatry 59:139–145. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.59.2.139

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Pérez-Fuentes G, Olfson M, Villegas L, Morcillo C, Wang S, Blanco C (2013) Prevalence and correlates of child sexual abuse: a national study. Compr Psychiatry 54:16–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2012.05.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Seto MC (2008) Pedophilia and sexual offending against children: theory, assessment, and intervention, 1st edn. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. American Psychiatric Association (2013) DSM-5: diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 5th edn. American Psychiatric Association, Washington, DC

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Blanchard R, Kuban ME, Klassen P, Dickey R, Christensen BK, Cantor JM et al (2003) Self-reported head injuries before and after age 13 in pedophilic and nonpedophilic men referred for clinical assessment. Arch Sex Behav 32:573–581

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cantor JM, Blanchard R, Christensen BK, Dickey R, Klassen PE, Beckstead AL et al (2004) Intelligence, memory, and handedness in pedophilia. Neuropsychology 18:3–14. https://doi.org/10.1037/0894-4105.18.1.3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cantor JM, Blanchard R, Robichaud LK, Christensen BK (2005) Quantitative reanalysis of aggregate data on IQ in sexual offenders. Psychol Bull 131:555–568. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.131.4.555

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Joyal CC, Black DN, Dassylva B (2007) The neuropsychology and neurology of sexual deviance: a review and pilot study. Sex Abuse 19:155–173. https://doi.org/10.1177/107906320701900206

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fabian JM (2012) Neuropsychology, neuroscience, volitional impairment and sexually violent predators: a review of the literature and the law and their application to civil commitment proceedings. Aggress Violent Behav 17:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2011.07.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Stoléru S, Fonteille V, Cornélis C, Joyal C, Moulier V (2012) Functional neuroimaging studies of sexual arousal and orgasm in healthy men and women: a review and meta-analysis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 36:1481–1509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.03.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Burns JM, Swerdlow RH (2003) Right orbitofrontal tumor with pedophilia symptom and constructional apraxia sign. Arch Neurol 60:437–440. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.60.3.437

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mendez M, Shapira JS (2011) Pedophilic behavior from brain disease. J Sex Med 8:1092–1100. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.02172.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mohnke S, Müller S, Amelung T, Krüger TH, Ponseti J, Schiffer B et al (2014) Brain alterations in paedophilia: a critical review. Prog Neurobiol 122:1–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pneurobio.2014.07.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Schiltz K, Witzel J, Northoff G, Zierhut K, Gubka U, Fellmann H et al (2007) Brain pathology in pedophilic offenders: evidence of volume reduction in the right amygdala and related diencephalic structures. Arch Gen Psychiatry 64:737. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.64.6.737

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Poeppl TB, Nitschke J, Santtila P, Schecklmann M, Langguth B, Greenlee MW et al (2013) Association between brain structure and phenotypic characteristics in pedophilia. J Psychiatr Res 47:678–685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2013.01.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Gerwinn H, Pohl A, Granert O, van Eimeren T, Wolff S, Jansen O et al (2015) The (in)consistency of changes in brain macrostructure in male paedophiles: a combined T1-weighted and diffusion tensor imaging study. J Psychiatr Res 68:246–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2015.07.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sartorius A, Ruf M, Kief C, Demirakca T, Bailer J, Ende G et al (2008) Abnormal amygdala activation profile in pedophilia. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 258:271–277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00406-008-0782-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Poeppl TB, Nitschke J, Dombert B, Santtila P, Greenlee MW, Osterheider M et al (2011) Functional cortical and subcortical abnormalities in pedophilia: a combined study using a choice reaction time task and fMRI. J Sex Med 8:1660–1674. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2011.02248.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Schiffer B, Krueger T, Paul T, de Greiff A, Forsting M, Leygraf N et al (2008) Brain response to visual sexual stimuli in homosexual pedophiles. J Psychiatry Neurosci 33:23–33

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Schiffer B, Paul T, Gizewski E, Forsting M, Leygraf N, Schedlowski M et al (2008) Functional brain correlates of heterosexual paedophilia. Neuroimage 41:80–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.02.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Habermeyer B, Esposito F, Händel N, Lemoine P, Klarhöfer M, Mager R et al (2013) Immediate processing of erotic stimuli in paedophilia and controls: a case control study. BMC Psychiatry 13:88. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-13-88

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Polisois-Keating A, Joyal CC (2013) Functional neuroimaging of sexual arousal: a preliminary meta-analysis comparing pedophilic to non-pedophilic men. Arch Sex Behav 42:1111–1113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-013-0198-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ponseti J, Granert O, Jansen O, Wolff S, Beier K, Neutze J et al (2012) Assessment of pedophilia using hemodynamic brain response to sexual stimuli. Arch Gen Psychiatry 69:187. https://doi.org/10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.130

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Tenbergen G, Wittfoth M, Frieling H, Ponseti J, Walter M, Walter H et al (2015) The neurobiology and psychology of pedophilia: recent advances and challenges. Front Hum Neurosci 9:344. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00344

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Redouté J, Stoléru S, Grégoire M C, Costes N, Cinotti L, Lavenne F et al (2000) Brain processing of visual sexual stimuli in human males. Hum Brain Mapp 11:162–77. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0193(200011)11:3<162::AID-HBM30>3.0.CO;2-A

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Redouté J, Stoléru S, Pugeat M, Costes N, Lavenne F, Le Bars D et al (2005) Brain processing of visual sexual stimuli in treated and untreated hypogonadal patients. Psychoneuroendocrinology 30:461–482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2004.12.003

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. American Psychiatric Association (2000) Desk reference to the diagnostic criteria from DSM-IV-TR. American Psychiatric Association, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  30. World Health Organization (1992) The ICD-10 Classification of Mental and Behavioural Disorders: Clinical Descriptions and Diagnostic Guidelines. World Health Organization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  31. Rosen RC, Beck JG (1988) Concerns involving human subjects in sexual psychophysiology. In: Rosen RC, Beck JG (eds) Patterns of sexual arousal. Psychophysiological processes and clinical applications. The Guilford Press, New York, pp 345–355

    Google Scholar 

  32. Oldfield RC (1971) The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh Inventory. Neuropsychologia 9:97–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Axelrod B (2001) Evaluation of seven-subtest short forms of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-III in a referred sample. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 16:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0887-6177(99)00054-2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Raymond NC, Coleman E, Ohlerking F, Christenson GA, Miner M (1999) Psychiatric comorbidity in pedophilic sex offenders. Am J Psychiatry 156:786–788

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Langevin R, Paitich D (2002) Sex history questionnaire for males—revised. Multi-Health Systems, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  36. Stoléru S, Moulier V, Fonteille V, Cazala F (2011) Développement du Questionnaire sur l’intensité des Fantasmes, des Désirs et des Comportements Sexuels chez les Auteurs de Violences Sexuelles sur Enfants. In Cahiers des Résumés, 6e congrès international francophone sur l’agression sexuelle—CIFAS. Montreux, Switzerland

  37. Bancroft J, Tennent G, Loucas K, Cass J (1974) The control of deviant sexual behaviour by drugs: I. Behavioural changes following oestrogens and anti-androgens. Br J Psychiatry 125:310–315. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.125.3.310

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Reynolds CF, Frank E, Thase ME, Houck PR, Jennings JR, Howell JR et al (1988) Assessment of sexual function in depressed, impotent, and healthy men: factor analysis of a brief sexual function questionnaire for men. Psychiatry Res 24:231–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1781(88)90106-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Hoon EF, Hoon PW, Wincze JP (1976) An inventory for the measurement of female sexual arousability. Arch Sexual Behav 5:291–300. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01542081

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Derogatis LR (1977) The SCL-90-R manual. I: scoring, administration and procedures for the SCL-90. Clinical Psychometrics, Baltimore

  41. Beck AT (1978) Depression Inventory. Center for Cognitive Therapy, Philadelphia

  42. Patton JH, Stanford MS (1995) Factor structure of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale. J Clin Psychol 51(199511):97–113. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4679(199511)51:6%3C768::AID-JCLP2270510607%3E3.0.CO;2-1

    Google Scholar 

  43. Déchaud H, Lejeune H, Garoscio-Cholet M, Mallein R, Pugeat M (1989) Radioimmunoassay of testosterone not bound to sex-steroid-binding protein in plasma. Clin Chem 35:1609–1614

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Mouras H, Stoléru S, Moulier V, Pélégrini-Issac M, Rouxel R, Grandjean B et al (2008) Activation of mirror-neuron system by erotic video clips predicts degree of induced erection: an fMRI study. Neuroimage 42:1142–1150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.05.051

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Deichmann R, Gottfried JA, Hutton C, Turner R (2003) Optimized EPI for fMRI studies of the orbitofrontal cortex. Neuroimage 19:430–441. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00073-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Poeppl TB, Langguth B, Laird AR, Eickhoff SB (2014) The functional neuroanatomy of male psychosexual and physiosexual arousal: a quantitative meta-analysis. Hum Brain Mapp 35:1404–1421. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.22262

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Maldjian JA, Laurienti PJ, Burdette JB, Kraft RA (2003) An automated method for neuroanatomic and cytoarchitectonic atlas-based interrogation of fMRI data sets. NeuroImage 19:1233–1239. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00169-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Woo CW, Krishnan A, Wager TD (2014) Cluster-extent based thresholding in fMRI analyses: pitfalls and recommendations. Neuroimage 91:412–419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.12.058

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Shostakovich BV, Smirnova LK, Tkachenko AA, Ushakova IM, Kartelishev AV, Nikolaeva TN (1992) A comparative evaluation of the biochemical and psychopathological characteristics in subjects with signs of pedophilia. Zhurnal Nevropatol I Psikhiatrii Imeni SS, Korsakova (Moscow, Russia: 1952) 92(5–12):83–88

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Moulier V, Fonteille V, Pélégrini-Issac M, Cordier B, Baron-Laforêt S, Boriasse E et al (2012) A pilot study of the effects of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist therapy on brain activation pattern in a man with pedophilia. Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol 56:50–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X10392191

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Walter M, Witzel J, Wiebking C, Gubka U, Rotte M, Schiltz K et al (2007) Pedophilia is linked to reduced activation in hypothalamus and lateral prefrontal cortex during visual erotic stimulation. Biol Psychiatry 62:698–701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.10.018

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Arnow BA, Desmond JE, Banner LL, Glover GH, Solomon A, Polan ML et al (2002) Brain activation and sexual arousal in healthy, heterosexual males. Brain 125:1014–1023. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awf108

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Walter M, Bermpohl F, Mouras H, Schiltz K, Tempelmann C, Rotte M et al (2008) Distinguishing specific sexual and general emotional effects in fmri—subcortical and cortical arousal during erotic picture viewing. Neuroimage 40:1482–1494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.01.040

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Moulier V, Mouras H, Pélégrini-Issac M, Glutron D, Rouxel R, Grandjean B et al (2006) Neuroanatomical correlates of penile erection evoked by photographic stimuli in human males. Neuroimage 33:689–699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.06.037

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Stoleru S, Gregoire MC, Gerard D, Decety J, Lafarge E, Cinotti L et al (1999) Neuroanatomical correlates of visually evoked sexual arousal in human males. Arch Sex Behav 28:1–21

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Sennwald V, Pool E, Brosch T, Delplanque S, Bianchi-Demicheli F, Sander D (2016) Emotional attention for erotic stimuli: Cognitive and brain mechanisms. J Comp Neurol 1:524:1668–1675. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.23859

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Berridge KC, Robinson TE (2003) Parsing reward. Trends Neurosci 26:507–513

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research project has been made possible by a grant from the Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique (PHRC 2008 No. 27.42; Promoter: Hospices Civils de Lyon; Principal Investigator: Michel Pugeat). We thank D. Berges, E. Bardinet, E. Bertasi, A. Burgos, N. Cohen, O. Cousson, M. Didier, N. Domanger, E. Guilloux, C. Guivarch, J. Krebs, B. Marcepoil, F. Meissonnier, P. Molin, F. Mulliez, N. Nicolas, K. Nigaud, A. Petiau, L. Tabet, and R. Valabrègue for their help in data collection as well as V. Raverot for hormonal measurements.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Serge Stoléru.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

The study was approved by the local ethics committee (CPP Sud-Est: No. A00451-56) and was performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments.

Informed consent

Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects after complete description of the study.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cazala, F., Fonteille, V., Moulier, V. et al. Brain responses to pictures of children in men with pedophilic disorder: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 269, 713–729 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00406-018-0933-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00406-018-0933-z

Keywords

Navigation