Skip to main content
Log in

Reliability of cone beam computed tomography in scalar localization of the electrode array: a radio histological study

  • Otology
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Postoperative imaging plays a growing role in clinical studies concerning prognostic factors in cochlear implantation. Indeed, intracochlear position of the cochlear implant has recently been identified as a contributor in functional outcomes and radiological tools must be accurate enough to determine the final placement of the electrode array. The aim of our study was to validate cone beam computed tomography as a reliable technique for scalar localization of the electrode array. We performed therefore a temporal bone study on ten specimens that were implanted with a perimodiolar implant prototype. Cone beam reconstructions were performed and images were analyzed by two physicians both experienced in cochlear implant imaging, who determined the scalar localization of the implant. Temporal bones then underwent histological control to document this scalar localization and hypothetical intracochlear lesions. In four cases, a dislocation from scala tympani to scala vestibuli was suspected on cone beam reconstructions of the ascending part of the basal turn. In three of these four specimens, dislocation in pars ascendens was confirmed histologically. In the remaining temporal bone, histological analysis revealed an elevation with rupture of the basilar membrane. Histological assessment revealed spiral ligament tearing in another bone. We conclude that cone beam is a reliable tool to assess scalar localization of the selectrode array and may be used in future clinical studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Blamey P, Arndt P, Bergeron F, Bredberg G, Brimacombe J, Facer G, Larky J, Lindstrom B, Nedzelski J, Peterson A, Shipp D, Staller S, Whitford L (1996) Factors affecting auditory performance of postlinguistically deaf adults using cochlear implants. Audiol Neurootol 1:293–306

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. UK Cochlear Implant Study Group (2004) Criteria of candidacy for unilateral cochlear implantation in postlingually deafened adults iii: prospective evaluation of an actuarial approach to defining a criterion. Ear Hear 25:361–374

    Google Scholar 

  3. Blamey P, Artieres F, Baskent D, Bergeron F, Beynon A, Burke E, Dillier N, Dowell R, Fraysse B, Gallego S, Govaerts PJ, Green K, Huber AM, Kleine-Punte A, Maat B, Marx M, Mawman D, Mosnier I, O’Connor AF, O’Leary S, Rousset A, Schauwers K, Skarzynski H, Skarzynski PH, Sterkers O, Terranti A, Truy E, Van de Heyning P, Venail F, Vincent C, Lazard DS (2012) Factors affecting auditory performance of postlinguistically deaf adults using cochlear implants: an update with 2251 patients. Audiol Neurootol 18:36–47

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wilson BS, Dorman MF (2008) Cochlear implants: a remarkable past and a brilliant future. Hear Res 242:3–21

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Aschendorff A, Kromeier J, Klenzner T, Laszig R (2007) Quality control after insertion of the nucleus contour and contour advance electrode in adults. Ear Hear 28:75S–79S

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Finley CC, Holden TA, Holden LK, Whiting BR, Chole RA, Neely GJ, Hullar TE, Skinner MW (2008) Role of electrode placement as a contributor to variability in cochlear implant outcomes. Otol Neurotol 29:920–928

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Shepherd RK, Hatsushika S, Clark GM (1993) Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: the effect of electrode position on neural excitation. Hear Res 66:108–120

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lecerf P, Bakhos D, Cottier JP, Lescanne E, Trijolet JP, Robier A (2011) Midmodiolar reconstruction as a valuable tool to determine the exact position of the cochlear implant electrode array. Otol Neurotol 32:1075–1081

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Dahmani-Causse M, Marx M, Deguine O, Fraysse B, Lepage B, Escude B (2011) Morphologic examination of the temporal bone by cone beam computed tomography: comparison with multislice helical computed tomography. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis 128:230–235

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cushing SL, Daly MJ, Treaba CG, Chan H, Irish JC, Blaser S, Gordon KA, Papsin BC (2012) High-resolution cone-beam computed tomography: a potential tool to improve atraumatic electrode design and position. Acta Otolaryngol 132:361–368

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Briggs RJ, Tykocinski M, Lazsig R, Aschendorff A, Lenarz T, Stover T, Fraysse B, Marx M, Roland JT Jr, Roland PS, Wright CG, Gantz BJ, Patrick JF, Risi F (2011) Development and evaluation of the modiolar research array–multi-centre collaborative study in human temporal bones. Cochlear Implants Int 12:129–139

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Biedron S, Prescher A, Ilgner J, Westhofen M (2010) The internal dimensions of the cochlear scalae with special reference to cochlear electrode insertion trauma. Otol Neurotol 31:731–737

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Briggs RJ, Tykocinski M, Xu J, Risi F, Svehla M, Cowan R, Stover T, Erfurt P, Lenarz T (2006) Comparison of round window and cochleostomy approaches with a prototype hearing preservation electrode. Audiol Neurootol 11(Suppl 1):42–48

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lenarz T, Stover T, Buechner A, Paasche G, Briggs R, Risi F, Pesch J, Battmer RD (2006) Temporal bone results and hearing preservation with a new straight electrode. Audiol Neurootol 11(Suppl 1):34–41

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Eshraghi AA, Yang NW, Balkany TJ (2003) Comparative study of cochlear damage with three perimodiolar electrode designs. Laryngoscope 113:415–419

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lane JI, Driscoll CL, Witte RJ, Primak A, Lindell EP (2007) Scalar localization of the electrode array after cochlear implantation: a cadaveric validation study comparing 64-slice multidetector computed tomography with microcomputed tomography. Otol Neurotol 28:191–194

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lane JI, Witte RJ, Driscoll CL, Shallop JK, Beatty CW, Primak AN (2007) Scalar localization of the electrode array after cochlear implantation: clinical experience using 64-slice multidetector computed tomography. Otol Neurotol 28:658–662

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Teymouri J, Hullar TE, Holden TA, Chole RA (2011) Verification of computed tomographic estimates of cochlear implant array position: a micro-ct and histologic analysis. Otol Neurotol 32:980–986

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Aschendorff A, Kubalek R, Turowski B, Zanella F, Hochmuth A, Schumacher M, Klenzner T, Laszig R (2005) Quality control after cochlear implant surgery by means of rotational tomography. Otol Neurotol 26:34–37

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Wardrop P, Whinney D, Rebscher SJ, Roland JT Jr, Luxford W, Leake PA (2005) A temporal bone study of insertion trauma and intracochlear position of cochlear implant electrodes. I: comparison of nucleus banded and nucleus contour electrodes. Hear Res 203:54–67

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Stover T, Issing P, Graurock G, Erfurt P, ElBeltagy Y, Paasche G, Lenarz T (2005) Evaluation of the advance off-stylet insertion technique and the cochlear insertion tool in temporal bones. Otol Neurotol 26:1161–1170

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Handzel O, Burgess BJ, Nadol JB Jr (2006) Histopathology of the peripheral vestibular system after cochlear implantation in the human. Otol Neurotol 27:57–64

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Tien HC, Linthicum FH Jr (2002) Histopathologic changes in the vestibule after cochlear implantation. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 127:260–264

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Todt I, Basta D, Ernst A (2008) Does the surgical approach in cochlear implantation influence the occurrence of postoperative vertigo? Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 138:8–12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The implant prototypes were provided by Cochlear Limited. Histological evaluation was performed by Cochlear Limited.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mathieu Marx.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Marx, M., Risi, F., Escudé, B. et al. Reliability of cone beam computed tomography in scalar localization of the electrode array: a radio histological study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 271, 673–679 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-013-2448-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-013-2448-6

Keywords

Navigation