Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The autologous osteochondral transplantation of the knee: clinical results, radiographic findings and histological aspects

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction: The osteochondral transplantation (OCT) is a well accepted treatment option for focal cartilage lesions in the knee joint, whereas the fate of the transplanted cartilage is still unclear and the clinical outcome is variable. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the histological character of autologous transplanted cartilage and to correlate technical aspects and the patients’ history with the clinical outcome. Material and Methods: The OCT was performed in 27 patients (median age of 32 (22–43) years) with a focal chondral lesion at the medial femoral condyle. We investigated the clinical outcome after a median follow-up of 13.5 (5–28) months using the Lysholm-score and the integration of the transplanted plugs using an MRI-scoring system. Biopsy specimens from representative patients (n=8) were evaluated with histological staining and immunohistochemistry. Results: The median Lysholm-score was 80 (range 45–98). The wide range of the Lysholm-score in clinical outcome did not show significant differences in: follow-up, concomitant injuries, defect size or genesis. The MRI analysis revealed in all cases a regular osseous integration of the subchondral bone, but a failed chondral integration. The congruency of the plugs to the joint surface was often incorrect, however a correlation between the MRI-score and the clinical outcome could not be shown. Histology of the transplanted cartilage revealed small changes in immunohistochemistry after a relatively short-term follow-up, whereas the cartilage has still the typical hyaline character. Often, the surrounding cartilage consists of fibrous and granulation tissue. Conclusion: The congruency of the joint surface can not be restored to the original status, particularly in larger defects with irregular shapes. However, we did not find any aspects which affected the function of the knee joint following OCT. It can be assumed that remaining lesions at the surrounding cartilage could maintain the inflammatory process and therefore maintain the pain and a low knee function. Further investigations are needed to specify the effects of the OCT on the transplanted cartilage and its influence on the later clinical outcome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Agneskirchner J, Brucker P, Burkart A, Imhoff A (2002) Large osteochondral defects of the femoral condyle: press-fit transplantation of the posterior femoral condyle (MEGA-OATS). Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 10:160–168

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Anderson A, Richards D, Pagnani M, Hovis W (1997) Antegrade drilling for osteochondritis dissecans of the knee. Arthroscopy 13:319–324

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Aubin PP, Cheah HK, Davis AM, Gross AE (2001) Long-term followup of fresh femoral osteochondral allografts for posttraumatic knee defects. Clin Orthop: S318–S327

  4. Beaver RJ, Mahomed M, Backstein D, Davis A, Zukor DJ, Gross AE (1992) Fresh osteochondral allografts for post-traumatic defects in the knee. A survivorship analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 74:105–110

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bobic V (1996) Arthroscopic osteochondral autograft transplantation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a preliminary clinical study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 3:262–264

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Buckwalter JA (2002) Articular cartilage injuries. Clin Orthop: 21–37

  7. Czitrom A, Keating S, Gross A (1990) The viability of articular cartilage in fresh osteochondral allografts after clinical transplantation. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 72:574–81

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Garrett JC (1986) Treatment of osteochondral defects of the distal femur with fresh osteochondral allografts: a preliminary report. Arthroscopy 2:222–226

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Goymann V (1999) Abrasionschondroplastik. Orthopäde 28:11–18

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Grigolo B, Roseti L, De Franceschi L, Piacentini A, Cattini L, Manfredini M, Faccini R, Facchini A (2005) Molecular and immunohistological characterization of human cartilage two years following autologous cell transplantation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87-A:46–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hangody L, Karpati Z, Szerb I, Eberhart R (1996) Autologous osteochondral mosaic.like graft technique for replacing weight bearing cartilage defects. Abstract, 7th Congress of the ESSKA, Budapest, Hungary

  12. Hangody L, Kish G, Karpati Z, Szerb I, Udvarhelyi I (1997) Arthroscopic autogenous osteochondral mosaicplasty for the treatment of femoral condylar articular defects. A preliminary report. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 5:262–267

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hangody L, Feczko P, Bartha L, Bodo G, Kish G (2001) Mosaicplasty for the treatment of articular defects of the knee and ankle. Clin Orthop: S328–S336

  14. Hangody L, Kish G, Modis L, Szerb I, Gaspar L, Dioszegi Z, Kendik Z (2001) Mosaicplasty for the treatment of osteochondritis dissecans of the talus: two to seven year results in 36 patients. Foot Ankle Int 22:552–558

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hangody L, Fules P (2003) Autologous osteochondral mosaicplasty for the treatment of full-thickness defects of weight-bearing joints: ten years of experimental and clinical experience. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A:25–32

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hangody L, Rathonyi GK, Duska Z, Vasarhelyi G, Fules P, Modis L (2004) Autologous osteochondral mosaicplasty. Surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A:65–72

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Herber S, Runkel M, Pitton MB, Kalden P, Thelen M, Kreitner KF (2003) [Indirect MR-arthrography in the follow up of autologous osteochondral transplantation]. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 175:226–233

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Hesse W, Hesse I (1979) [Cartilage transplantation in the knee joint experiment—clinic—technique (author’s transl)]. Zentralbl Chir 104:1269–1279

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Horas U, Schnettler R, Pelinkovic D, Herr G, Aigner T (2000) [Osteochondral transplantation versus autogenous chondrocyte transplantation. A prospective comparative clinical study]. Chirurg 71:1090–1097

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Horas U, Pelinkovic D, Herr G, Aigner T, Schnettler R (2003) Autologous chondrocyte implantation and osteochondral cylinder transplantation in cartilage repair of the knee joint. A prospective, comparative trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A:185–192

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Hunter W (1743) On the structure and deseases of articulating cartilages. Philos Trans R Soc Lond 19:236

    Google Scholar 

  22. Imhoff A, Öttl G, Burkart A, Traub S (1999) Autologous osteochondral transplantation on various joints. Orthopäde 28:33–44

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Imhoff AB, Oettl GM (2000) Arthroscopic and Open Techniques for Transplantation of Osteochondral Autografts and Allografts in Various Joints. Surg Technol Int VIII: 249–252

  24. Jakob RP, Franz T, Gautier E, Mainil-Varlet P (2002) Autologous osteochondral grafting in the knee: indication, results, and reflections. Clin Orthop: 170–84

  25. Krueger JA, Thisse P, Ewers BJ, Dvoracek-Driksna D, Orth MW, Haut RC (2003) The extent and distribution of cell death and matrix damage in impacted chondral explants varies with the presence of underlying bone. J Biomech Eng 125:114–119

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Lane JG, Tontz WL Jr, Ball ST, Massie JB, Chen AC, Bae WC, Amiel ME, Sah RL, Amiel D (2001) A morphologic, biochemical, and biomechanical assessment of short-term effects of osteochondral autograft plug transfer in an animal model. Arthroscopy 17: 856–863

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Laprell H, Petersen W (2001) Autologous osteochondral transplantation using the diamond bone-cuttin system (DBCS): 6–12 years’ follow up of 35 patients with osteochondral defects at the knee joint. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 121:248–253

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Laprell H, Petersen W (2001) Autologous osteochondral transplantation using the diamond bone-cutting system (DBCS): 6–12 years’ follow-up of 35 patients with osteochondral defects at the knee joint. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 121:248–53

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Lysholm J, Gillquist J (1982) Evaluation of knee ligament surgery results with special emphasis on use of scoring scale. Am J Sports Med 10:150–154

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Makino T, Fujioka H, Kurosaka M, Matsui N, Yoshihara H, Tsunoda M, Mizuno K (2001) Histologic analysis of the implanted cartilage in an exact-fit osteochondral transplantation model. Arthroscopy 17:747–751

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Matsusue Y, Yamamuro T, Hama H (1993) Arthroscopic multiple osteochondral transplantation to the chondral defect in the knee associated with anterior cruciate ligament disruption. Arthroscopy 9:318–321

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Meyers MH, Jones RE, Bucholz RW, Wenger DR (1983) Fresh autogenous grafts and osteochondral allografts for the treatment of segmental collapse in osteonecrosis of the hip. Clin Orthop: 107–12

  33. Nabavi-Tabrizi A, Turnbull A, Dao Q, Appleyard R (2002) Chondrocyte damage following osteochondral grafting using metal and plastic punches: comparative study in an animal model. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 10:170–172

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Outerbridge R (1961) The etiology of chondromalacia patellae. J Bone Joint Surg Br 43:752–757

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Rinaldi E (1982) Treatment of osteochondritis dissecans and cartilaginous fractures of the knee by osteo-cartilaginous autografts. Ital J Orthop Traumatol 8:17–21

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Sanders TG, Mentzer KD, Miller MD, Morrison WB, Campbell SE, Penrod BJ (2001) Autogenous osteochondral ``plug'' transfer for the treatment of focal chondral defects: postoperative MR appearance with clinical correlation. Skeletal Radiol 30:570–578

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Schottle PB, Oettl GM, Agneskirchner JD, Imhoff AB (2001) [Operative therapy of osteochondral lesions of the talus with autologous cartilage-bone transplantation]. Orthopade 30:53–58

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Siebert C, Miltner O, Weber M, Niedhart C (2001) Einwachsverhalten von osteochondralen Transplantaten–eine tierexperimentelle Studie. Sport Orthop Traumatol 17:120

    Google Scholar 

  39. Steadman JR, Rodkey WG, Briggs KK (2002) Microfracture to treat full-thickness chondral defects: surgical technique, rehabilitation, and outcomes. J Knee Surg 15:170–176

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Sternberger LA (1969) Some new developments in immunocytochemistry. Mikroskopie 25:346–361

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Tibesku CO, Szuwart T, Kleffner TO, Schlegel PM, Jahn UR, Van Aken H, Fuchs S (2004) Hyaline cartilage degenerates after autologous osteochondral transplantation. J Orthop Res 22:1210–1214

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Wagner H (1964) Operative Behandlung der Osteochondrosis dissecans des Kniegelenkes. Z Orthopädie: 62–64

  43. Yamashita F, Sakakida K, Suzu F, Takai S (1985) The transplantation of an autogenetic osteochondral fragment for osteochondritis dissecans of the knee. Clin Orthop: 43–50

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department for Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany

    Tim Rose, Pierre Hepp, Conrad Raczynski, Christoph Josten & Helmut Lill

  2. Institute of Anatomy, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany

    Steffen Craatz & Joachim Weiss

  3. Arzt für Chirurgie und Sportmedizin Oberarzt Abteilung für Sportorthopädie, Technische Universität München Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Connolly Strasse 32, 80809, München, Germany

    Tim Rose

Authors
  1. Tim Rose
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Steffen Craatz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Pierre Hepp
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Conrad Raczynski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Joachim Weiss
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Christoph Josten
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Helmut Lill
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tim Rose.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rose, T., Craatz, S., Hepp, P. et al. The autologous osteochondral transplantation of the knee: clinical results, radiographic findings and histological aspects. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 125, 628–637 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-005-0010-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-005-0010-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation