Skip to main content
Log in

Shockwave–turbulent boundary layer interaction control using magnetically driven surface discharges

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experiments in Fluids Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study demonstrates the potential for shockwave–turbulent boundary layer interaction control in air using low current DC constricted surface discharges forced by moderate strength magnetic fields. An analytical model describing the physics of magnetic field forced discharge interaction with boundary layer flow is developed and compared to experiments. Experiments are conducted in a Mach 2.6 indraft air tunnel with discharge currents up to 300 mA and magnetic field strengths up to 5 Tesla. Separation- and non-separation-inducing shocks are generated with diamond-shaped shockwave generators located on the wall opposite to the surface electrodes, and flow properties are measured with schlieren imaging, static wall pressure probes and acetone flow visualization. The effect of plasma control on boundary layer separation depends on the direction of the Lorentz force (j × B). It is observed that by using a Lorentz force that pushes the discharge upstream, separation can be induced or further strengthened even with discharge currents as low as 30 mA in a 3-Tesla magnetic field. If shock-induced separation is present, it is observed that by using Lorentz force that pushes the discharge downstream, separation can be suppressed, but this required higher currents, greater than 80 mA. Acetone planar laser scattering is used to image the flow structure in the test section and the reduction in the size of recirculation bubble and its elimination are observed experimentally as a function of actuation current and magnetic field strength.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bookey P, Wyckham C, Smits A (2005) Experimental investigations of Mach 3 shock-wave turbulent boundary layer interactions, AIAA 2005-4899. In: 35th AIAA fluid dynamics conference and exhibit, Toronto, 6–9 June

  • Chapman DR, Kuehn DM, Larson HK (1958) Investigation of separated flows in supersonic and subsonic streams with emphasis on the effect of transition. NACA Rept. 1356

  • Delery J, Marvin JG (1986) Shockwave boundary layer interactions, AGARD-AG-280

  • Dolling DS (2001) Fifty years of shock-wave/boundary-layer interaction research: what next? AIAA J 30(8):1517–1531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fujino T, Funaki I, Mizuno M, Sugita H, Ishikawa M (2004) Numerical studies of influences of hall effect on MHD flow control around blunt body OREX. In: 35th AIAA plasmadynamics and lasers conference, Portland, 28 June–1 July, AIAA 2004-2561

  • Gaitonde DV (2008) High-speed magnetohydrodynamic flow control analyses with three-dimensional simulations. J Propuls Power 24:946

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jesse L, Nishihara M, Adamovich I, Samimy M (2009) High-lift airfoil trailing edge separation control using a single dielectric barrier discharge plasma actuator. Exp Fluids 0723-4864

  • Kalra CS, Shneider MN, Miles RB (2009) Numerical study of boundary layer separation control using magnetogasdynamic plasma actuators. Phys Fluids 21:106101. doi:10.1063/1.3233658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kral L (1999, Spring) Active flow control technology. ASME Fluids Engineering Division Newsletter, pp 3–6

  • Lin JC (2002) Review of research on low-profile vortex generators to control boundary layer separation. Prog Aerosp Sci 38:389–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lineberry JT, Bityurin VA, Bocharov AN (2002) Analytical study of MHD flow interaction around a right circular cylinder in transverse hypersonic flow. In: 33rd Plasmadynamics and lasers conference, Maui, 20–23 May, AIAA-2002-2112

  • McCormick DC (1992) Shock-boundary layer interaction control with low-profile vortex generator s and passive cavity. In: AIAA Paper 92-0064, 30th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, January 6–9

  • Nishihara M, Jiang N, Rich JW, Lempert WR, Adamovich IV (2005) Low-temperature supersonic boundary layer control using repetitively pulsed magnetohydrodynamic forcing. Phys Fluids 17:106102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Opaits DF, Neretti G, Likhanskii AV, Zaidi S, Shneider MN, Miles RB, Macheret SO (2007) Experimental investigation of DBD plasma actuators driven by repetitive high voltage nanosecond pulses with DC or low frequency sinusoidal bias. In: 38th Plasma dynamics and lasers conference, Miami, 25–28 June, AIAA Paper No. 2007-4532

  • Raizer YP (1997) Gas discharge physics. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Shang JS, Kimmel R, Hayes J, Tyler C, Menart J (2005) Hypersonic experimental facility for magnetoaerodynamic interactions. J Spacecr Rockets 42(5), September–October

  • Wu M, Bookey P, Martin MP, Smits AJ (2005) Analysis of shockwave/turbulent boundary layer interaction using DNS and experimental data. In: 43rd AIAA aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit, Reno, 10–13 January, AIAA Paper No. 2005-0310

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the AFOSR Unsteady Aerodynamics and Hypersonic Program, by a DARPA STTR program with CMI Inc., and by an AFOSR SBIR program (also with CMI. Inc.).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chiranjeev S. Kalra.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kalra, C.S., Zaidi, S.H., Miles, R.B. et al. Shockwave–turbulent boundary layer interaction control using magnetically driven surface discharges. Exp Fluids 50, 547–559 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-010-0898-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-010-0898-9

Keywords

Navigation