Abstract
To show the effects of different concentrations of contrast agent on signal time curves and image contrast of abdominal aorta, vena cava and portal vein in comparison to each other as well as liver and spleen. Imaging was carried out in a 1.0 Tesla clinical scanner. Sixty patients were prospectively included and divided into three contrast agent (Gd-DTPA) dosage groups (0.1 mmol/kg, 0.2 mmol/kg and 0.3 mmol/kg). All patients were scanned using a time-resolved 3D FLASH sequence (58 phases) with a 3.75 second acquisition time per phase. Signal time curves and image contrast levels were evaluated. No significant differences were found for the maximum signal enhancement between the groups in the investigated vessels. Image masking, the subtraction of the baseline images, resulted in a substantial improvement in image contrast. However, statistically significant differences between the contrast agent dosage groups could only be found for vena cava and liver. Vessel conspicuity is not significantly improved with an increase of contrast agent dose. However, an increase in contrast agent dosage increases vessel contrast. Our findings suggest that a single dose single station investigation seems to be sufficient for high quality abdominal MRA.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ho KY, Leiner T, de Haan MW et al (1999) Peripheral MR angiography. Eur.Radiol 9:1765–1774
Prince MR, Narasimham DL, Stanley JC et al (1995) Breath-hold gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of the abdominal aorta and its major branches. Radiology 197:785–792
Rofsky NM, Adelman MA (2000) MR angiography in the evaluation of atherosclerotic peripheral vascular disease. Radiology 214:325–338
Meaney JF, Prince MR (1999) Pulmonary MR angiography. Magn Reson.Imaging Clin N Am 7:393–409, x
Foo TK, Ho VB, Choyke PL (1999) Contrast-enhanced carotid MR angiography. Imaging principles and physics. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 9:263–284
Leiner T, de Haan MW, Nelemans PJ et al (2005) Contemporary imaging techniques for the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis. Eur Radiol 15:2219–2229
Schmitt R, Coblenz G, Cherevatyy O et al (2005) Comprehensive MR angiography of the lower limbs: a hybrid dual-bolus approach including the pedal arteries. Eur Radiol 15:2513–2524
Korner M, Baumgartner I, Do DD et al (1999) PTA of the subclavian and innominate arteries: long-term results. Vasa 28:117–122
Sawlani V, Phadke RV, Baijal SS et al (1996) Arterial complications of pancreatitis and their radiological management. Australas Radiol 40:381–386
Patel YD (1993) Vascular interventions in the abdomen: current status. Ann Acad Med Singapore 22:768–775
Dunnick NR, Sfakianakis GN (1991) Screening for renovascular hypertension. Radiol Clin North Am 29:497–510
Douek PC, Revel D, Chazel S, et al (1995) Fast MR angiography of the aortoiliac arteries and arteries of the lower extremity: value of bolus-enhanced, whole-volume subtraction technique. AJR Am J Roentgenol 165:431–437
Korosec FR, Frayne R, Grist TM et al (1996) Time-resolved contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography. Magn Reson Med 36:345–351
Merlino B, Salcuni M, Salute L et al (2001) Total body MR angiography and atherosclerosis. Rays 26:305–314
Saini S, Fretz CJ, Fisel CR et al (1991) In vitro evaluation of a mechanical injector for infusion of magnetic resonance contrast media. Invest Radiol 26:748–751
Frayne R, Grist TM, Swan JS et al (2000) 3D MR DSA: effects of injection protocol and image masking. J Magn Reson Imaging 12:476–487
Miller RG (1981) Simultaneous statistical inference. 2nd edn, Springer Berlin Heidelberlg New York
Hommel G (1988) A stagewise rejective multiple test procedure based on a modified Bonferroni test. Biometrika 75:383–386
Svensson J, Petersson JS, Stahlberg F et al (1999) Image artifacts due to a time-varying contrast medium concentration in 3D contrast-enhanced MRA. J Magn Reson Imaging 10:919–928
Earls JP, Rofsky NM, DeCorato DR et al (1996) Breath-hold single-dose gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional MR aortography: usefulness of a timing examination and MR power injector. Radiology 201:705–710
Boos M, Lentschig M, Scheffler K et al (1998) Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of peripheral vessels. Different contrast agent applications and sequence strategies: a review. Invest Radiol 33:538–546
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Heverhagen, J.T., Reitz, I., Pavlicova, M. et al. The impact of the dosage of intravenous gadolinium-chelates on the vascular signal intensity in MR angiography. Eur Radiol 17, 626–637 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-006-0419-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-006-0419-7