Skip to main content
Log in

Ultrasound of the joints and entheses in healthy children

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Tendon insertion pathologies such as enthesitis and apophysitis in children can result from trauma, overuse syndrome and arthritis. Knowledge of the US appearance of normal joints by age might aid diagnosis of pathologies.

Objective

We describe the age-related sonographic features of the elbows, knees and feet in healthy children, providing a reference for the normal appearance of tendon insertions, apophyseal cartilage and bursae.

Materials and methods

This is a prospective cross-sectional study of 30 healthy children. Children were grouped according to age: group 1 (4–9 years, n = 11), group 2 (10–13 years, n = 9) and group 3 (14–18 years, n = 10). Children completed pain and function questionnaires and underwent a standardized joint examination by a pediatric rheumatologist. The common extensor, common flexor, quadriceps, patellar and Achilles tendons and plantar fascia insertions were evaluated with gray-scale and power Doppler ultrasound. The anterior elbow, suprapatellar and retrocalcaneal bursae were evaluated for fluid. We measured the apophyseal cartilage thickness at the enthesis. Correlation analyses examined associations between age and tendon thickness. We used ANOVA, with location as a repeated measure, to test for gender differences in cartilage thickness.

Results

Children had a median age of 12.4 years and 55% were boys. All 360 entheses appeared normal on gray-scale imaging. There was a strong linear relationship between tendon thickness and age. Tendon vascularity was only present in young children (group 1), in 7/22 (32%) quadriceps tendons. Peri-tendinous power Doppler signal was seen at seven sites: two patellar, four quadriceps and one common flexor tendon, and all these children were in group 2. Suprapatellar bursal fluid <3 mm was detected in 9/60 (15%) knees. Of the children in group 1, boys had thicker apophyseal cartilage than girls at the medial epicondyle, patellar poles and os calcis (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Tendon vascularity may be a normal finding in young children, and mild peri-tendinous vascularity is not uncommon in children 10–13 years of age. Tendon thickness has a linear relationship with age; however cartilage thickness varies across sites and also differs as a function of gender

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adler RS, Finzel KC (2005) The complementary roles of MR imaging and ultrasound of tendons. Radiol Clin North Am 43:771–807

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Janow GL, Panghaal V, Trinh A et al (2011) Detection of active disease in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: sensitivity and specificity of the physical examination vs ultrasound. J Rheumatol 38:2671–2674

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lee D, Bouffard JA (2001) Ultrasound of the knee. Eur J Ultrasound 14:57–71

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Draghi F, Danesino GM, de Gautard R et al (2007) Ultrasound of the elbow: examination techniques and US appearance of the normal and pathologic joint. J Ultrasound 10:76–84

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Shah SH, Callahan MJ (2013) Ultrasound evaluation of superficial lumps and bumps of the extremities in children: a 5-year retrospective review. Pediatr Radiol 43:S23–40

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Friedman L, Finlay K, Jurriaans E (2001) Ultrasound of the knee. Skeletal Radiol 30:361–377

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. De Maeseneer M, Marcelis S, Cattrysse E et al (2012) Ultrasound of the elbow: a systematic approach using bony landmarks. Eur J Radiol 81:919–922

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lee MJ, Chow K (2007) Ultrasound of the knee. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 11:137–148

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fornage BD (1986) Achilles tendon: US examination. Radiology 159:759–764

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Pascual Huerta J, Alarcon Garcia JM (2007) Effect of gender, age and anthropometric variables on plantar fascia thickness at different locations in asymptomatic subjects. Eur J Radiol 62:449–453

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Matsos M, Harish S, Zia P et al (2009) Ultrasound of the hands and feet for rheumatological disorders: influence on clinical diagnostic confidence and patient management. Skeletal Radiol 38:1049–1054

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Balint PV, Kane D, Wilson H et al (2002) Ultrasonography of entheseal insertions in the lower limb in spondyloarthropathy. Ann Rheum Dis 61:905–910

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. De Miguel E, Cobo T, Munoz-Fernandez S et al (2009) Validity of enthesis ultrasound assessment in spondyloarthropathy. Ann Rheum Dis 68:169–174

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gandjbakhch F, Terslev L, Joshua F et al (2011) Ultrasound in the evaluation of enthesitis: status and perspectives. Arthritis Res Ther 13:R188

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Weiss PF, Chauvin NA, Klink AJ et al (2014) Detection of enthesitis in children with enthesitis-related arthritis: dolorimetry compared to ultrasonography. Arthritis Rheumatol 66:218–227

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Jousse-Joulin S, Breton S, Cangemi C et al (2011) Ultrasonography for detecting enthesitis in juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Arthritis Care Res 63:849–855

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lazovic D, Wegner U, Peters G et al (1996) Ultrasound for diagnosis of apophyseal injuries. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 3:234–237

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Pisacano RM, Miller TT (2003) Comparing sonography with MR imaging of apophyseal injuries of the pelvis in four boys. AJR Am J Roentgenol 181:223–230

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Klepper SE (2011) Measures of pediatric function: Child Health Assessment Questionnaire (C-HAQ), Juvenile Arthritis Functional Assessment Scale (JAFAS), Pediatric Outcomes Data Collection Instrument (PODCI), and Activities Scale for Kids (ASK). Arthritis Care Res 63:S371–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Jacobson JA (2007) Fundamentals of musculoskeletal ultrasound. Elsevier, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  21. Grechenig W, Mayr JM, Peicha G et al (2004) Sonoanatomy of the Achilles tendon insertion in children. J Clin Ultrasound 32:338–343

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wakefield RJ, Balint PV, Szkudlarek M et al (2005) Musculoskeletal ultrasound including definitions for ultrasonographic pathology. J Rheumatol 32:2485–2487

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Grassi W, Gutierrez M, Filippucci E (2010) The sound of enthesis. J Rheumatol 37:1986–1988

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Sherry DD, Sapp LR (2003) Enthesalgia in childhood: site-specific tenderness in healthy subjects and in patients with seronegative enthesopathic arthropathy. J Rheumatol 30:1335–1340

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ying M, Yeung E, Li B et al (2003) Sonographic evaluation of the size of Achilles tendon: the effect of exercise and dominance of the ankle. Ultrasound Med Biol 29:637–642

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Terslev L, Torp-Pedersen S, Qvistgaard E et al (2003) Estimation of inflammation by Doppler ultrasound: quantitative changes after intra-articular treatment in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 62:1049–1053

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Koski JM, Saarakkala S, Helle M et al (2006) Power Doppler ultrasonography and synovitis: correlating ultrasound imaging with histopathological findings and evaluating the performance of ultrasound equipments. Ann Rheum Dis 65:1590–1595

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Mandl P, Naredo E, Wakefield RJ et al (2011) A systematic literature review analysis of ultrasound joint count and scoring systems to assess synovitis in rheumatoid arthritis according to the OMERACT filter. J Rheumatol 38:2055–2062

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Newman JS, Adler RS, Bude RO et al (1994) Detection of soft-tissue hyperemia: value of power Doppler sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 163:385–389

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kelly S, Taylor P, Pitzalis C (2008) Ultrasound imaging in spondyloathropathies: from imaging to diagnostic intervention. Curr Opin Rheumatol 20:408–415

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Riente L, Delle Sedie A, Filippucci E et al (2007) Ultrasound imaging for the rheumatologist IX Ultrasound imaging in spondyloarthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 25:349–353

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Cook JL, Ptazsnik R, Kiss ZS et al (2005) High reproducibility of patellar tendon vascularity assessed by colour doppler ultrasonography: a reliable measurement tool for quantifying tendon pathology. Br J Sports Med 39:700–703

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Collado P, Naredo E, Calvo C et al (2007) Assessment of the joint recesses and tendon sheaths in healthy children by high-resolution B-mode and power Doppler sonography. Clin Exp Rheumatol 25:915–921

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Court-Payen M (2004) Sonography of the knee: intra-articular pathology. J Clin Ultrasound 32:481–490

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Naredo E, Bonilla G, Gamero F et al (2005) Assessment of inflammatory activity in rheumatoid arthritis: a comparative study of clinical evaluation with grey scale and power doppler ultrasonography. Ann Rheum Dis 64:375–381

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Spannow AH, Stenboeg E, Pfeiffer-Jensen M et al (2011) Ultrasound and MRI measurements of joint cartilage in healthy children: a validation study. Ultraschall Med 32:S110–116

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Spannow AH, Pfeiffer-Jensen M, Andersen NT et al (2010) Ultrasonographic measurements of joint cartilage thickness in healthy children: age- and sex-related standard reference values. J Rheumatol 37:2595–2601

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This manuscript was supported by a National Institutes of Health grant, as well as a Radiology Associates of Children’s Hospital at The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia intradepartmental grant.

Conflicts of interest

None

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nancy A. Chauvin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chauvin, N.A., Ho-Fung, V., Jaramillo, D. et al. Ultrasound of the joints and entheses in healthy children. Pediatr Radiol 45, 1344–1354 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-015-3313-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-015-3313-0

Keywords

Navigation