Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Safety of Magnetic Resonance Imaging After Implantation of Stainless Steel Embolization Coils

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Cardiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Stainless steel embolization coils (SSEC) have been used for over four decades for vascular occlusion. Recently, the safety of these coils in a magnetic resonance environment has been called into question, with important ramifications for thousands of patients with existing coils in place. We performed a retrospective chart review at five tertiary care pediatric centers evaluating all children and young adults with implanted SSEC who underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Data reviewed included demographics, coil implantation, MRI studies, and follow-up evaluations. Complications such as heating, discomfort, or device migration were specifically sought. Two hundred and ninety-seven patients with implanted SSEC underwent 539 MRI examinations. The median age at SSEC implantation was 2.3 years (1 week–23.2 years). The MRI studies were performed a median of 7.4 years (4 days–23.1 years) after implantation. No patients experienced any reported complications associated with their MRI examinations during the study or at median follow-up post-MRI of 4.8 years (1 day–23 years). In this large, retrospective review of patients with implanted SSEC undergoing MRI, there were no reported adverse events. These findings support the recent change by Cook Medical Inc. of their standard embolization coils from a designation of magnetic resonance unsafe to conditional.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ASTM:

American Society for Testing and Materials

MR:

Magnetic resonance

MRI:

Magnetic resonance imaging

SSEC:

Stainless steel embolization coils

References

  1. ASTM F2052–06e1 (2006) Standard test method for measurement of magnetically induced displacement force on medical devices in the magnetic resonance environment. ASTM International, West Conshohocken

    Google Scholar 

  2. ASTM F2119–01 (2001) Standard test method for evaluation of MR image artifacts from passive implants. ASTM International, West Conshohocken

    Google Scholar 

  3. ASTM F2182–02a (2002) Standard test method for measurement of radio frequency induced heating near passive implants during magnetic resonance imaging. ASTM International, West Conshohocken

    Google Scholar 

  4. ASTM F2213–06 (2006) Standard test method for measurement of magnetically induced torque on medical devices in the magnetic resonance environment. ASTM International, West Conshohocken

    Google Scholar 

  5. ASTM F2503–05 (2005) Standard practice for marking medical devices and other items for safety in the magnetic resonance environment. ASTM International, West Conshohocken

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cook Medical memo for discontinuation of stainless steel embolization coils (2012). http://www.cookmedical.com/di/content/mmedia/PI_SS_Coil_Discontinuation.pdf. Accessed 1 Aug 2013

  7. Cook Medical MReye embolization coil brochure (2006). http://www.cookmedical.com/di/content/mmedia/MREYE306.pdf. Accessed Jan 8 2013

  8. Dedini RD, Karacozoff AM, Shellock FG, Xu D, McClellan RT, Pekmezci M (2013) MRI issues for ballistic objects: information obtained at 1.5-, 3- and 7-Tesla. Spine J 13:815–822

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Garg R, Powell AJ, Sena L, Marshall AC, Geva T (2005) Effects of metallic implants on magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of Fontan palliation. Am J Cardiol 95:688–691

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gianturco C, Anderson JH, Wallace S (1975) Mechanical devices for arterial occlusion. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med 124:428–435

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Goldstein HM, Wallace S, Anderson JH, Bree RL, Gianturco C (1976) Transcatheter occlusion of abdominal tumors. Radiology 120:539–545

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Grifka RG, Fenrich AL, Tapio JB (2008) Transcatheter closure of patent ductus arteriosus and aorto-pulmonary vessels using non-ferromagnetic Inconel MReye embolization coils. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 72:691–695

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gurtcheff SE (2008) Introduction to the MAUDE database. Clin Obstet Gynecol 51:120–123

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kainz W (2007) MR heating tests of MR critical implants. J Magn Reson Imaging 26:450–451

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Liu Y, Chen J, Shellock FG, Kainz W (2013) Computational and experimental studies of an orthopedic implant: MRI-related heating at 1.5-T/64-MHz and 3-T/128-MHz. J Magn Reson Imaging 37:491–497

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. McComb C, Allan D, Condon B (2009) Evaluation of the translational and rotational forces acting on a highly ferromagnetic orthopedic spinal implant in magnetic resonance imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 29:449–453

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Published memo from cook medical on designation change for stainless steel embolization coils to MR conditional. Dated March 14 2012

  18. Published memo from cook medical on designation of stainless steel embolization coils changing to MR unsafe. Dated Feb 25 2011

  19. Shellock FG (2007) Comments on MR heating tests of critical implants. J Magn Reson Imaging 26:1182–1185

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Shellock FG, Slimp G (1990) Eddy-current-induced artifacts caused by an “MR-compatible” halo device. Radiology 175:586

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Shellock FG, Slimp G (1990) Halo vest for cervical spine fixation during MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 154:631–632

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Shellock FG, Morisoli S, Kanal E (1993) MR procedures and biomedical implants, materials, and devices: 1993 update. Radiology 189:587–599

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. U.S. FDA, CDRH (1997) A primer on medical device interactions with magnetic resonance imaging systems. http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/GuidanceDocuments/ucm107721.htm. Accessed 16 Dec 2012

  24. Wallace S, Gianturco C, Anderson JH, Goldstei NH, Davis LJ, Bree RL (1976) Therapeutic vascular occlusion utilizing steel coil technique: clinical applications. AJR Am J Roentgenol 127:381–387

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

There are no specific acknowledgements. None of the authors received any funding for this project or manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Timothy C. Slesnick.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Slesnick, T.C., Schreier, J., Soriano, B.D. et al. Safety of Magnetic Resonance Imaging After Implantation of Stainless Steel Embolization Coils. Pediatr Cardiol 37, 62–67 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-015-1240-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-015-1240-3

Keywords

Navigation