Skip to main content
Log in

Modeling of kinematics errors and alignment method of a swing arm ultra-precision diamond turning machine

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ultra-precision machining has been widely used in the manufacturing of optical components. Volumetric error analysis and error compensation are essential issues that must be considered to improve the accuracy of the machining process. However, analysis of the effects of kinematics errors on surface generation by ultra-precision machining using a swing arm ultra-precision diamond turning machine (SA-UDTM) and the alignment methods required have received little research attention to date. This paper presents the development of a kinematics error model of the SA-UDTM that accounts for geometric errors by simplifying the machining system and considering it as a rigid multi-body system. Then, the main error contributions to the processing precision can be derived from sensitivity analysis of error components. Finally, an alignment method is developed to reduce or eliminate the corresponding positioning errors of the mechanical system and thus improves the form accuracy of processed surface. To verify the theoretical kinematics model and the proposed alignment method, a series of contrast machining experiments have been performed, and the experimental results indicate that the proposed method is effective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Eman KF, Wu BT, DeVries MF (1987) A generalized geometric error model for multi-axis machines. CIRP Ann Manuf Tech 36(1):253–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Rahman M, Heikkala J, Lappalainen K (2000) Modeling, measurement and error compensation of multi-axis machine tools. Part I: theory. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 40(10):1535–1546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Okafor AC, Ertekin YM (2000) Derivation of machine tool error models and error compensation procedure for three axes vertical machining center using rigid body kinematics. Int J Mach Tool Manu 40(8):1199–1213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kong LB, Cheung CF, To S, Lee WB, Du JJ, Zhang ZJ (2008) A kinematics and experimental analysis of form error compensation in ultra-precision machining. Int J Mach Tool Manu 48(12–13):1408–1419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Schwenke H, Knapp W (2008) Geometric error measurement and compensation of machines—an update. CIRP Ann Manuf Tech 57(2):660–675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen G, Liang Y, Sun Y, Chen W, Wang B (2013) Volumetric error modeling and sensitivity analysis for designing a five-axis ultra-precision machine tool. Int J Adv Manu Tech 68(9–12):2525–2534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tian W, Gao W, Chang W, Nie Y (2014) Error modeling and sensitivity analysis of a five-axis machine tool. Math Probl Eng 30(1):135–142

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lee ES, Suh SH, Shon JW (1998) A comprehensive method for calibration of volumetric positioning accuracy of CNC-machines. Int J Adv Manu Tech 14(1):43–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hsu WY, Chen JS (2004) Error analysis and auto-calibration for a cartesian-guided tripod machine tool. Int J Adv Manu Tech 24(11–12):899–909

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Liu Y, Gao D, Lu Y (2015) Volumetric calibration in multi-space in large-volume machine based on measurement uncertainty analysis. Int J Adv Manu Tech 76(9–12):1493–1503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Givi M, Mayer JRR (2015) Volumetric error formulation and mismatch test for five-axis CNC machine compensation using differential kinematics and ephemeral G-code. Int J Adv Manu Tech 77(9–12):1645–1653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Huang T, Whitehouse DJ, Chetwynd DG (2002) A unified error model for tolerance design, assembly and error compensation of 3-DOF parallel kinematic machines with parallelogram struts. CIRP Ann Manuf Tech 51(1):297–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Huang T, Li Y, Tang G, Li S, Zhao X, Whitehouse DJ, Chetewyn DG, Liu X (2002) Error modeling, sensitivity analysis and assembly process of a class of 3-DOF parallel kinematic machines with parallelogram struts. Sci China 45(5):467–476

    Google Scholar 

  14. Chen Y, Xie F, Liu X, Zhou Y (2014) Error modeling and sensitivity analysis of a parallel robot with SCARA (selective compliance assembly robot Arm) motions. Chinese J Mech Eng 27(4):693–702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dias JMP, Pereira MS (1997) Sensitivity analysis of rigid-flexible multibody systems. Multibody Syst Dyn 1(3):303–322

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Honghui Yao or Zengqiang Li.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yao, H., Li, Z., Zhao, X. et al. Modeling of kinematics errors and alignment method of a swing arm ultra-precision diamond turning machine. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 87, 165–176 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-8451-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-8451-5

Keywords

Navigation