Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Human critical success factors for kaizen and its impacts in industrial performance

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article presents the results of a survey with 13 main activities related to human factors that are executed during kaizen implementation process and were integrated in four independent latent variables (management commitment, education, communication and motivation) that are associated to 14 benefits obtained after its implementation that were grouped in three dependent latent variables (process, workers and customers). The survey was applied to persons with responsibilities in continuous improvement programs and projects in companies located in Mexico. Independent and dependent variables were integrated in a structural equation model that was evaluated using partial least squares algorithms WarpPLS® for finding causal relations among them. Results indicate that management commitment and education are the main factors that guarantee the success for kaizen implementation programs, but that is moderated by a good communication for having good operational process performance for better workers and customer satisfaction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Imai M (1996) Kaizen: the key to Japan’s competitive success. Editorial CECSA, Mexico. In Spanish

  2. Nemoto M (1987) Total quality control for management. Strategies and techniques from Toyota and Toyoda Gosei. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cheser R (1998) The effect of Japanese Kaizen on employee motivation in US manufacturing. Int J Org Anal 6(3):197–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Aoki K (2008) Transferring Japanese Kaizen activities to overseas plants in China. Int J Oper Prod Manag 28(6):518–539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Tanner C, Roncarti J (1994) Kaizen leads to breakthroughs in responsiveness and the Shingo prize at Critikon. Natl Prod Rev 13(4):517–531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Rink J (2005) Lean can save American manufacturing. Reliable plant. http://www.rmdonovan/articles/pdf_2005/Lean_. Accessed 15 September 2011

  7. Jaca C, Mateo R, Tanco M, Viles E, Santos J (2010) Sustainability of continuous improvement systems in industry: a survey in the Basque and Navarre. Intangible Cap 6(1):51–77, In Spanish

    Google Scholar 

  8. Suárez B, Miguel J (2009) In search of an area of sustainability: an empirical study of the implementation of continuous improvement process in Spanish City Councils. INNOVAR J Admin Soc Sci 19(35):47–64, In Spanish

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rockart JF (1979) Chief executives define their own data needs. Harv Bus Rev 2:81–93

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rockart JF (1981) A primer on critical success factors. In: Bullen CV (ed) The rise of managerial computing: the best of the center for information systems research. McGraw-Hill School Education Group (1986). Dow Jones-Irwin, Homewood, IL

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kaye M, Anderson R (1999) Continuous improvement: the ten essential criteria. Int J Qual Reliab Manag 16(5):485–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Tapias A, Yeison A, Correa R, Hernan J (2010) KAIZEN: a case of study. Scien Et Techn 16(45):59–64, In Spanish

    Google Scholar 

  13. Romero R, Noriega S, Escobar C, Ávila D (2009) Critical success factors: a competitiveness strategy. CULCYT 6(31):5–14, In Spanish

    Google Scholar 

  14. Landa A (2009) Key success factors for Kaizen events and its permanence. Sinnco 1–20. In Spanish

  15. Rapp C, Eklund J (2002) Sustainable development of improvement activities—the long-term operation of a suggestion scheme in a Swedish company. Total Qual Manag 13(7):945–969

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jørgensen F, Boer H, Gertsen F (2004) Development of a team-base framework for conducting self-assessment of continuous improvement. J Manuf Tech Manag 15(4):343–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Cox A, Zagelmeyer S, Marchington M (2006) Embedding employee involvement and participation at work. Hum Resour Manag J 16(3):250–267

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bhuiyan N, Baghel A, Wilson J (2007) A sustainable continuous improvement methodology at an aerospace company. Int J Prod Perform Manag 55(8):671–687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bisgaard S (2007) Quality management and Juran’s legacy. Qual Reliab Eng Int 23:665–677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Upton D (1996) Mechanism for building and sustaining operations improvemente. Eur Manag J 14(3):1996

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bateman N (2005) Sustainability: the elusive element of process improvement. Int J Oper Prod Manag 25(3):261–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Cooney R, Sohal A (2004) Teamwork and total quality management: a durable partnership. Total Qual Manag Bus Excell 15(8):1131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Farris JA (2003) A standard frame work for sustaining Kaizen events. Master’s thesis. Department of Industrial and Manufacturing, Wichita, KS, USA

    Google Scholar 

  24. Melnyk SA, Calantone RJ, Montabon FL, Smith RT (1998) Short-term action in pursuit of long-term improvements: introducing Kaizen events. Prod Invent Manag J 39(4):69–76

    Google Scholar 

  25. Prajogo D, Sohal A (2004) The sustainability and evolution of quality improvement Programmes—an Australian case study. Total Qual Manag 15(2):205–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Dale B, Boaden R, Wilcox M, McQuarter R (1997) Sustaining total quality management: what are the key issues? TQM Mag 9(2):372–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Bessant J, Caffyn S (1997) High-involvement innovation through continuous improvement. Int J Technol Manag 14(1):7–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Melnyk S (1998) Short-term action in pursuit of long-term improvements: introducing Kaizen. Prod Invent Manag J 39(4):69–76

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. Readman J (2007) What challenges lie ahead for improvement programmes in the UK? Lessons from the CINet continuous improvement survey 2003. Int J Technol Manag 37(3):290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Vasilash GS (1993) Walking the talk of Kaizen at Freudenberg-NOK. Production 105(12):66–71

    Google Scholar 

  31. Taylor DL, Ramsey RK (1993) Empowering employees to ‘just do it’. Train Dev 47(5):71–76

    Google Scholar 

  32. Rusiniak S (1996) Maximizing your IE value. IIE Solutions 28(6):12–16

    Google Scholar 

  33. Sheridan JH (1997) Kaizen blitz. Ind Week 246(16):18–27

    Google Scholar 

  34. Cuscela KN (1998) Kaizen blitz attacks work processes at Dana Corp. IIE Solutions 30(4):29–31

    Google Scholar 

  35. LeBlanc G (1999) Kaizen at Hill-Rom. Ctr Qual Manag J 8(2):49–53

    Google Scholar 

  36. Wheatley B (1998) Innovation in ISO registration. CMA 72(5):23

    Google Scholar 

  37. McNichols T, Hassinger R, Bapst GW (1999) Quick and continuous improvement through Kaizen blitz. Hosp Mater Manage Q 20(4):1–7

    Google Scholar 

  38. Hasek G (2000) Extraordinary extrusions. Ind Week 249(17):79–80

    Google Scholar 

  39. Creswell J (2001) America’s elite factories. Fortune 144(4):206A

    Google Scholar 

  40. Bane R (2002) Leading edge quality approaches in non-manufacturing organizations, quality congress. ASQ’s Ann Qual Proc 245–249

  41. Redding R (1996) Lantech ‘Kaizen’ process draws 63 observers from across the globe, Business first of Louisville. http://louisville.bizjournals.com/louisville/stories/1996/09/30/story3.html. Accessed 10 June 2004

  42. Oakeson M (1997) Kaizen makes dollars & sense for Mercedes-Benz in Brazil. IIE Solutions 29(4):32–35

    Google Scholar 

  43. Minton E (1998) Profile: Luke Faulstick—‘Baron of blitz’ has boundless vision of continuous improvement. Ind Manag 40(1):14–21

    Google Scholar 

  44. Suárez B, Miguel J, Castillo I (2011) The application of Kaizen in Mexican organizations: an empirical study. GCG 5(4):60–74

    Google Scholar 

  45. Likert R (1932) A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Arch Psychol 22(140):1–55

    Google Scholar 

  46. Glover W, Farris JA, Van Aken EM, Doolen TL (2011) Critical success factors for the sustainability of Kaizen event human resource outcomes: an empirical study. Int J Prod Econ 132(2):197–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Holtskog H (2013) Continuous improvement beyond the lean understanding. Procedia CIRP 7:575–579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Cua A, Mckone K, Schroedr R (2001) Relationships between implementation of TQM, JIT and TPM and manufacturing performance. J Oper Manag 19(6):675–694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Denneberg D, Grabisch M (2004) Measure and integral with purely ordinal scales. J Math Psychol 48(1):15–22

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  50. Flynn BB, Sakakibara S (1995) Relationship between JIT and TQM: practices and performance. Acad Manage J 38(5):1325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Kaya N (2006) The impact of human resource management practices and corporate entrepreneurship on firm performance: evidence from Turkish firms. Int J Hum Resour Manag 17(12):2074–2090

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  52. Long RJ, Shields JL (2005) Best practice or best fit? High involvement management and base pay practices in Canadian and Australian firms. Asia Pac J Hum Resour 43(1):52–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Ooi KB, Arumugam V, Safa MS, Bakar NA (2007) HRM and TQM: association with job involvement. Pers Rev 36(6):939–962

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Schroeder RG, Bates KA, Junttila MA (2002) A resource-based view of manufacturing strategy and the relationship to manufacturing performance. Strat Manag J 23(3):105–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Zacharatos A, Barling J, Iverson RD (2005) High-performance work systems and occupational safety. J Appl Psychol 90(1):77–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Butterworth C (2001) In: Taylor D, Brunt D (eds) From value stream mapping to shop floor improvement: a case study of Kaikaku, manufacturing operations and supply chain management: the lean approach. Thomson Learning, London, UK, pp 185–193

    Google Scholar 

  57. Hair JF, Anderson RE, Tatham RL (1987) Multivariate data analysis. Macmillan, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  58. Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE (2009) Multivariate data analysis. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  59. Giaquinta M (2009) Mathematical analysis: an introduction to functions of several variables. Springer, New York, NY

    Book  Google Scholar 

  60. Kaiser HM (2010) Mathematical programming for agricultural, environmental, and resource economics. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  61. Rosenthal R, Rosnow RL (1991) Essentials of behavioral research: methods and data analysis. McGraw Hill, Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  62. Wold S, Trygg J, Berglund A, Antti H (2001) Some recent developments in PLS modeling. Chemom Intell Lab Syst 58(2):131–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Cronbach LJ (1951) Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 16(3):297–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Nunnally JC (1978) Psychometric theory, 1st edn. McGraw Hill, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  65. Fornell C, Larcker DF (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Mark Res 18(1):39–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Nunnally JC, Bernstein H (2005) Psychometric theory, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill Interamericana, México, DF (In Spanish)

    Google Scholar 

  67. Kock N (2013) WarpPLS© 3.0 user manual. ScriptWarp Systems™. Laredo, TX, USA

  68. Cenfetelli R, Bassellier G (2009) Interpretation of formative measurement in information systems research. MIS Q 33(4):689–708

    Google Scholar 

  69. Petter S, Straub D, Rai A (2007) Specifying formative constructs in information systems research. MIS Q 31(4):623–656

    Google Scholar 

  70. Kline RB (1998) Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford Press, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  71. Hahn C, Johnson MD, Herrmann A, Huber F (2002) Capturing customer heterogeneity using a finite mixture pls approach. Schmalenbach Bus Rev 54(July):243–269

    Google Scholar 

  72. Sarstedt M (2008) A review of recent approaches for capturing heterogeneity in partial least squares path modeling. J Model Manag 3(2):140–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Lin C, Chow W, Madu CN, Kuei CH, Pei YP (2005) A structural equation model of supply chain quality management and organizational performance. Int J Prod Econ 96(3):355–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Jabbour CJC, Jabbour AB, Govindan K, Teixeira AA, Freitas W (2013) Environmental management and operational performance in automotive companies in Brazil: the role of human resource management and lean manufacturing. J Clean Prod 47:129–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Sawhney R (2013) Implementing labor flexibility: a missing link between acquired labor flexibility and plant performance. J Oper Manag 31(1–2):98–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Industrial Engineering and Manufacturing, Autonomous University of Ciudad Juarez, Av. Del Charro 450 Norte, Ciudad Juarez, Chihuahua, Mexico, 32310

    Jorge L. García, Aidé A. Maldonado, Alejandro Alvarado & Denisse G. Rivera

Authors
  1. Jorge L. García
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Aidé A. Maldonado
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Alejandro Alvarado
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Denisse G. Rivera
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jorge L. García.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

García, J.L., Maldonado, A.A., Alvarado, A. et al. Human critical success factors for kaizen and its impacts in industrial performance. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 70, 2187–2198 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-013-5445-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-013-5445-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation