Skip to main content
Log in

Geographical approaches to crop conservation: The partitioning of genetic diversity in andean potatoes

  • Published:
Economic Botany Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The geographical concepts of spatial scale and the human-geographic region offer significant contributions to the conservation of crop genetic resources. They are used in the present study to examine the partitioning of genetic diversity along two axes: geographical location and landrace population.

Locations in the study consist of three micro-regions within the highland Paucartambo region of southern Peru. Six widely distributed landraces of the potato species Solatium stenotomum Juz. et Buk. and S. tuberosum subsp. andigena (Juz. et Buk.) Hawkes are evaluated. Electrophoretic analysis of isozyme loci demonstrates that the majority of allelic variation is contained within the geographical and landrace populations. Geographically, greater than 99% of total variation is found within single micro-regions. Taxonomically, approximately 75% of variation occurs within individual landraces. The weak geographical partitioning of allelic variation is due in part to formerly high rates of seed-tuber exchange. The weak-moderate taxonomic partitioning of variation is attributed to common parentage and shared introgression. Unique genotypes are microgeographically concentrated.

Findings recommend that conservation strategies focus on intensive sampling or preservation in micro-regional areas due to the concentration of unique genotypes. Evaluation of the spatial patterning of diversity and recognition of the taxonomic specificity of results (not necessarily applicable even to related potato landraces) rely on biogeographical and human-geographic concepts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Alcorn, J. B. 1984. Huastec Mayan ethnobotany. Univ. Texas Press, Austin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altieri, M. A., and L. C. Merrick. 1987.In situ conservation of crop genetic resources through maintenance of traditional farming systems. Econ. Bot. 41:86–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, E. 1952. Plants, man, and life. Univ. California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw, A. D. 1975. Population structure and the effects of isolation and selection. Pages 37–51in O. H. Frankel and J. G. Hawkes, eds., Crop genetic resources for today and tomorrow. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A. H. D. 1978. Isozymes, plant population genetic structure and genetic conservation. Theor. Appl. Gen. 52:145–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brush, S. B. 1986. Genetic diversity and conservation in traditional farming systems. J. Ethnobiol. 6:151–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1989. Rethinking crop genetic resource conservation. Biol. Conser. 3:1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —,Carney, H. J., and Z. Huamán. 1981. Dynamics of Andean potato agriculture. Econ. Bot. 35:70–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • -,and S. Vaupel. n.d. Maintaining genetic diversity in agricultural development, in prep.

  • Cain, S. A. 1944. Foundations of plant geography. Harper, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douches, D. S., and C. F. Quiros. 1988. Additional isozyme loci in tuber-bearingSolariums: inheritance and linkage relationships. J. Heredity 79:377–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankel, O. H., and M. E. Soulé. 1981. Conservation and evolution. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frère, M., Rea, J., and J. Q. Rijks. 1975. Estudio agroclimatológico de la zona andina. FAO, Rome.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gade, D. W. 1975. Plants, man, and the land in the Vilcanota Valley of Peru. Dr. Junk, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1981. Some research themes in the cultural geography of the Central Andean highlands. Pages 123–128in P. Baker and C. Jest, eds., L’homme et son environnement à haute altitude. Editions CNRS, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, A. 1988. The new regional geography in English and French-speaking countries. Progress Human Geogr. 12:209–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grun, P. 1990. The evolution of cultivated potatoes. Econ. Bot. (Supp.) 44(3):39–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamrick, J.L. 1983. The distribution of genetic variation within and among natural plant populations. Pages 335–348in C. M. Schonewald-Cox, S. M. Chambers, B. MacBryde, and L. Thomas, eds., Genetics and conservation: a reference for managing wild animal and plant populations. Benjamin/Cummings, Menlo Park, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,and R. W. Allard. 1972. Microgeographical variation in allozyme frequencies inAvena barbata. Proc. Natl. Acad. U.S.A. 69:2100–2104.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harlan, J. R. 1951. Anatomy of gene centers. Amer. Naturalist 85:97–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1971. Agricultural origins: centers and noncenters. Science 174:468–474.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1975a. Crops and man. American Soc. Agron. and Crop Science Soc. Amer., Madison, Wisconsin.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1975b. Our vanishing genetic resources. Science 188:618–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkes, J. G. 1978. Biosystematics of the potato. Pages 15–69in P. M. Harris, ed., The potato crop: the scientific basis for improvement. Chapman and Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1983. The diversity of crop plants. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1990. The potato: Evolution, biodiversity, and genetic resources. Smithsonian Inst. Press, Washington, D.C..

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedrick, P. W. 1986. Genetic polymorphisms in heterogenous environments: a decade later. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 17:535–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iltis, H. H. 1974. Freezing the genetic landscape— the preservation of diversity in cultivated plants as an urgent social responsibility of the plant geneticist and plant taxonomist. Maize Gen. Coop. Newsl. 48:199–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingram, G. B., and J. T. Williams. 1984.In situ conservation of wild relatives of crops. Pages 163–179in J. H. W. Holden and J. T. Williams, eds., Crop genetic resources: Conservation and evaluation. Allen and Unwin, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M. T., J. G. Hawkes, and P. R. Rowe. 1980. An ethnobotanical field study of primitive potato varieties in Peru. Euphytica 29:107–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jain, S. K. 1969. Comparative ecogenetics ofAvena fatua andA. barbata occurring in central California. Evol. Biol. 3:73–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1975. Population structure and the effects of breeding system. Pages 15–36in O. H. Frankel and J. G. Hawkes, eds., Crop genetic resources for today and tomorrow. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johannessen, C. L., Wilson, M. R., and W. A. Davenport. 1970. The domestication of maize: process or event? Geogr. Rev. 60(3):393–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolasa, J. 1989. Ecological systems in hierarchical perspective: breaks in community structure and other consequences. Ecology 70:36–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyman, J. K. 1984. Progress and planning for germplasm conservation of major food crops. Plant Gen. Resources Newsl. 60:3–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur, R. H., and E. O. Wilson. 1967. The theory of island biogeography. Monographs in Population Biology, No. 1. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morishima, H., Sano, Y., and H. I. Oka. 1984. Differentiation of perennial and annual types due to habitat conditions in the wild riceOryza perennis. Pl. Syst. Evol. 144:119–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nabhan, G. P. 1985. Native crop diversity and Aridoamerica: conservation of regional gene pools. Econ. Bot. 39:387–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nevo, E., Zohary, D., Brown, A. H. D., and M. Haber. 1979. Genetic diversity and environmental associations of wild barley,Hordeum spontaneum, in Israel. Evolution 33:815–833.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oldfield, M.L., and J.B. Alcorn. 1987. Conservation of traditional agro-ecosystems. BioScience 37:199–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlove, B.S., and R. Godoy. 1986. Sectoral fallowing systems in the Central Andes. J. Ethnobiol. 6:169–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polunin, N. 1960. Introduction to plant geography and some related sciences. Longmans Group, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pudup, M. B. 1988. Arguments within regional geography. Progress Human Geogr. 12:369–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quiros, C.F. 1981. Starch gel electrophoresis techniques used with alfalfa and otherMedicago species. Can. J. Pl. Science 61:745–749.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • —,and N. McHale. 1985. Genetic analysis of isozyme variants in diploid and tetraploid potatoes. Genetics 111:131–145.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • —,Brush, S. B., Douches, D. S., Zimmerer, K. S., and G. Huestis. 1990. Biochemical and folk assessment of variability of Andean cultivated potatoes. Econ. Bot. 44:254–266.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rapoport. 1982. Areography: geographical strategies of species. Pergamon Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rick, C. M., Fobes, J. F., and M. Holle. 1977. Genetic variation inLycopersicon pimpinellifolium: evidence of evolutionary change in mating systems. Pl. Syst. Evol. 127:139–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sauer, C. O. 1950. Cultivated plants of South and Central America. Pages 487–543in J. H. Steward, ed., Handbook of South American Indians, Vol. 6. Smithsonian Inst. Bureau Amer. Ethn. Bull. 143, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1952. Agricultural origins and dispersals. The American Geographical Society, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sauer, J. D. 1988. Plant migration: the dynamics of geographic patterning in seed plant species. Univ. California Press, Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schonewald-Cox, S. N., S. M. Chambers, B. MacBryde, and L. Thomas, eds. 1983. Genetics and conservation: a reference for managing wild animal and plant populations. Benjamin/Cummings, Menlo Park, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff, D., and L. G. Abele. 1982. Refuge design and island biogeographical theory: effects of fragmentation. Amer. Naturalist 120:41–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soulé, M. E., and B. A. Wilcox, eds. 1980. Conservation biology: an evolutionary/ecological perspective. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuber, C. W., J. F. Wendel, M. M. Goodman, and J. S. C. Smith. 1988. Techniques and scoring procedures for starch gel electrophoresis of enzymes from maize(Zea mays L.). Tech. Bull. 286, N.C. Agri. Res. Service, N. Carolina State Univ., Raleigh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Troll, C. 1966. The Cordilleras of the Tropical Amer icas: aspects of climatic, phytogeographical and agrarian ecology. Pages 15–56in C. Troll, ed., Geoecology of the mountainous regions of the Tropical Americas. Proc. 1966 UNESCO Symp. (Mexico). Ferd Dummlers, Bonn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Udvardy, M. D. F. 1969. Dynamic zoogeography. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ugent, D. 1970. The potato. Science 170:1161–1166.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vallejos, C. E. 1983. Enzyme activity staining. Pages 469–516in S. D. Tanksley and T. Orton, eds., Isozymes in plant genetics and breeding. Vol. A. Elsevier, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vargas, C. 1949. Las papas sud peruanos. I Parte. Editorial Leon, Cuzco.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1956. Las papas sud peruanos. II Parte. Editorial Leon, Cuzco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vavilov, N. I. 1926. Studies on the origin of cultivated plants. Inst. of Applied Botany and Plant Breeding, Leningrad.

    Google Scholar 

  • -. 1950. The origin, variation, immunity, and breeding of cultivated plants. Chronica Botanica (Waltham, Mass.), Vol. 13, Nos. 1-6, pp. 14-54.

  • White, J. W. 1983. Pollination of potatoes under natural conditions. CIP Circular 11:1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkes, H. G., and S. Wilkes. 1972. The Green Revolution. Environ. 14(8):32–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeven, A. C., and J. M. J. de Wet. 1982. Dictionary of cultivated plants and their regions of diversity. Centre for Agricultural Publishing and Documentation, Wageningen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhukovsky, P. M. 1975. World gene pools for plant breeding: mega-genecenters and endemic micro-ge-necenters. USSR Academy of Sciences, Leningrad.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerer, K. S. n.d., a. The regional biogeography of native potato cultivars in highland Peru. J. Biogeogr., in press.

  • -. n.d., b. Maintaining diversity in maize and potato fields of the Peruvian Andes. J. Ethnobiol., in press.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Presented at the Symposium on New Directions in Crop Genetic Resource Conservation, Thirtieth Annual Meeting, Society for Economic Botany, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, 12–13 June 1989; symposium organized by Stephen B. Brush.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zimmerer, K.S., Douches, D.S. Geographical approaches to crop conservation: The partitioning of genetic diversity in andean potatoes. Econ Bot 45, 176–189 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02862046

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02862046

Keywords

Navigation