Skip to main content
Log in

Water and soil biotic relations in mercury distribution

  • Published:
Water, Air, and Soil Pollution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The distribution of Hg is considered both in terms of its availability in soil fractions and the relationship between Hg in plant samples and Hg in ambient soils or other supportive media. The plants were grouped by habitat into epipedic-epiphytic (mosses, lichens) and endopedic-aquaticmarine (Basidiomycetes and algae) samples; non-vacular and vascular forms were also distinguished. Sources included Alaska, Hawaii, New England and Iceland. Brief consideration was also given to Hg distribution in a plant-animal-soil community. Data were expressed in terms of plant Hg content and plant substratum concentration ratio. Average Hg contents and concentration ratios, and modal ranges for the ratios were determined. The results showed similar average Hg contents in all groups (126 to 199 ppb) but a low value (84 ppb) in the lichens; terrestrial forms had ratios of 3.5 to 7.6 whereas the marine algae yielded a figure of 78.7. The modal ranges were 1 to 2 fold for mosses and lichens, 2 to 10 fold for Basidiomycetes and vascular plants and > 10 fold for algae. In addition to the modal ratio in the range 2–10 common to all 275 vascular plant samples, a secondary mode in the range 0 to 0.1 appeared only in the Alaska-New England group, over 500 km distant from active thermal sites. Thus evidence for both exclusion and concentration behavior was obtained.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Curley, A., Sedlak, V., Girling, E., Hawk, R., and Barthel, W.: 1971,Science 172, 65.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eshelman, A., Siegel, S., and Siegel, B.: 1971,Nature 233, 471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, A.: 1971,Science 171, 788.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hatch, W. and Ott, W.: 1968,Anal. Chem. 40, 2085.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joensuu, O.: 1971,Science 172, 1027.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katsuna, M.: 1968,Study Group of Minamata Disease, Kumamoto University.

  • Mittelhauser, H.: 1970,At. Absorp. Newsl. 9, 134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, N.: 1971,Hazards of Mercury. Special Report to the Secretary's Advisory Committee, Department of Health, Education and Welfare,Environ. Res. 4, 1.

  • Siegel, S.: 1973,Environ. Biol. Med. 2, 19.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, B., Siegel, S., and Thorarinsson, F.: 1973a,Nature 241, 526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, S., Siegel, B., Eshleman, A., and Bachmann, K.: 1973b,Environ. Biol. Med. 2, 81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, S., Eshleman, A., Umeno, I., Puerner, N., and Smith, C.: 1973c, in D. Buhler, (ed.),Mercury in the Western Environment, Proceedings of the Workshop, DCE Press, Oregon State University, Corvallis.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Geological Survey: 1970,Prof: Paper No. 713.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Siegel, S.M., Siegel, B.Z., Puerner, N. et al. Water and soil biotic relations in mercury distribution. Water Air Soil Pollut 4, 9–18 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01794128

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01794128

Keywords

Navigation