Skip to main content
Log in

Somatosensory evoked potential correlates of psychophysical magnitude estimations for tactile air-puff stimulation in man

  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Brief air-puff stimuli were applied to the volar surface of the right hand to obtain both psychophysical and neurophysiological responses. The detection threshold (So) was first determined (0.56 kg · cm-2±0.20 kg · cm-2, mean±SD) and six levels of the stimulus intensities (So + 0.25 kg · cm-2, So + 1.25 kg · cm-2, So + 2.50 kg · cm-2, So + 3.75 kg · cm-2, So + 5.00 kg · cm-2, and So + 6.25 kg · cm-2) were employed for magnitude estimation using the stimulus level of So + 2.50 kg · cm-2 as the standard stimulus. The subject was asked to estimate numerically the series of stimulus intensities randomly presented. Cortical SEPs were recorded over the hand sensory area in response to a set of 120 air-puffs at the identical intensity level. Thus SEPs for six sets of stimulus intensities given in a random order were obtained from each subject. Six components (N20, P27, N35, P45, N60, and P75) were recorded within 100 ms following stimulation. It was seen that a simple power function with an exponent of 0.81 could be an adequate description of the stimulus-response function for magnitude estimation, as was also revealed by the high correlation coefficient (r=0.98). Similarly, stimulus-amplitude functions of different SEP components were well represented by straight lines in double logarithmic plots. The function of the early P27-N35 had the highest exponent (0.56) and also the highest correlation coefficient (r=0.91). Plotting subjective magnitude on the abscissa produced power functions similar to the stimulus-amplitude functions. However, higher correlations were observed for later components. The amplitudes of the four earlier components correlated with stimulus intensity when the effect of subjective magnitudes was removed. In contrast, the correlation between amplitudes and subjective magnitudes with stimulus intensity held constant was positive and significant for the later three components. These results may indicate that early SEP components represent neural coding of physical intensity while later components are more closely related to the subjective judgment of the stimulus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allison T, Goff WR, Williamson PD, VanGilder JC (1980) On the neural origin of early components of the human somatosensory evoked potential. In: Desmedt JE (ed) Clinical uses of cerebral, brainstem and spinal somatosensory evoked potentials. Progress in clinical neurophysiology, Vol 7. Karger, Basel, pp 51–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards AL (1972) Experimental design in psychological research. Holt Rinehart and Winston, New York, pp 330–362

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhart C (1947) The assumptions underlying the analysis of variance. Biometrics 3: 1–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Franzén O, Offenloch K (1969) Evoked response correlates of psychophysical magnitude estimates for tactile stimulation in man. Exp Brain Res 8: 1–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Gandevia SC, Burke D, McKeon BB (1983) Convergence in the somatosensory pathway between cutaneous afferents from the index and middle fingers in man. Exp Brain Res 50: 415–425

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner EP, Costanzo RM (1980) Spatial integration of multiplepoint stimuli in primary somatosensory cortical receptive fields of alert monkeys. J Neurophysiol 43: 420–443

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner EP, Hämäläinen HA, Warren S, Davis J, Young W (1984) Somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) and cortical single unit responses elicited by mechanical tactile stimuli in awake monkeys. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 58: 537–552

    Google Scholar 

  • Goff GD, Matsumiya J, Allison T, Goff WR (1977) The scalp topography of human somatosensory and auditory evoked potentials. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 42: 57–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Goff WR, Williamson PD, VanGilder JC, Allison T, Fisher TC (1980) Neural origin of long latency evoked potentials recorded from the depth and from the cortical surface of the brain in man. In: Desmedt JE (ed) Clinical uses of cerebral, brainstem and spinal somatosensory evoked potentials. Progress in clinical neurophysiology, Vol 7. Karger, Basel, pp 126–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrington T, Merzenich MH (1970) Neural coding in the sense of touch: human sensations of skin indentation compared with the response of slowly adapting mechanoreceptive afferents innervating the hairy skin of monkeys. Exp Brain Res 10: 251–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Hashimoto I (1987a) Somatosensory evoked potentials elicited by sharp-fronted air-puff stimuli in man. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 66: 93p

  • Hashimoto I (1987b) Somatosensory evoked potentials elicited by air-puff stimuli generated by a new high-speed air control system. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 67: 231–237

    Google Scholar 

  • Hashimoto I (1988) Trigeminal evoked potentials following brief air puff: enhanced signal-to-noise ratio. Ann Neurol 23: 332–338

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishiko N, Hanamori T, Murayama N (1980) Spatial distribution of somatosensory responses evoked by tapping the tongue and finger in man. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 58: 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Järvilehto T, Hämäläinen H, Soininen K (1981) Peripheral neural basis of tactile sensations in man. II. Characteristics of human mechanoreceptors in the hairy skin and correlations of their activity with tactile sensations. Brain Res 219: 13–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansson RS, Vallbo ÅB (1979) Detection of tactile stimuli. Thresholds of afferent units related to psychophysical threshold in the human hand. J Physiol 297: 405–422

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson D, Jürgens R, Kongehl G, Kornhuber HH (1975) Somatosensory evoked potentials and magnitude of perception. Exp Brain Res 22: 231–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Kakigi R, Shibasaki H (1984) Scalp topography of mechanically and electrically evoked somatosensory potentials in man. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 59: 44–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Knibestöl M (1973) Stimulus-response functions of rapidly adapting mechano-receptors in the human glabrous skin area. J Physiol 232: 427–452

    Google Scholar 

  • Knibestöl M, Vallbo ÅB (1980) Intensity of sensation related to activity of slowly adapting mechanoreceptive units in the human hand. J Physiol 300: 251–267

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruger L, Kenton B (1973) Quantitative neural and psychophysical data for cutaneous mechanoreceptor function. Brain Res 49: 1–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesser RP, Koehle R, Lueders H (1979) Effect of stimulus intensity on short latency somatosensory evoked potentials. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 47: 377–382

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsumiya Y, Mostofsky DI (1972) Somatosensory evoked responses elicited by corneal and nostril air puff stimulation. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 33: 225–227

    Google Scholar 

  • Mountcastle VB (1967) The problem of sensing and the neural coding of sensory events. In: Quarton GC, Melnechuk T, Schmitt FO (eds) The neurosciences. Rockefeller Univ Press, New York, pp 393–408

    Google Scholar 

  • Murayama N (1985) Correlation of subjective assessments with somatosensory evoked potentials to electrical stimulation of finger in man. Physiol Soc Jpn 47: 171–181 (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ochoa J, Torebjörk E (1983) Sensations evoked by intraneural microstimulation of single mechanoreceptor units innervating the human hand. J Physiol 342: 663–654

    Google Scholar 

  • Papakostopoulos D, Crow HJ (1980) Direct recording of the somatosensory evoked potentials from the cerebral cortex of man and the difference between precentral and postcentral potentials. In: Desmedt JE (ed) Clinical uses of cerebral, brainstem and spinal somatosensory evoked potentials. Progress in clinical neurophysiology, Vol 7. Karger, Basel, pp 15–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosner BS, Goff WR (1967) Electrical response of the nervous system and subjective scales of intensity. In: Neff WD (ed) Contribution to sensory physiology, Vol 2. Academic Press, London, pp 169–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan TA (1960) Significance tests for multiple comparison of proportions, variances, and other statistics. Psychol Bull 57: 318–328

    Google Scholar 

  • Schieppati M, Ducati A (1984) Short latency cortical potentials evoked by tactile air-jet stimulation of body and face in man. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 58: 418–425

    Google Scholar 

  • Snedecor GW, Cochran WG (1967) Statistical methods, 6th edn. The Iowa State University Press, Ames Iowa, pp 432–436

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens JC, Mack JD (1959) Scales of apparent force. J Exp Psychol 58: 405–413

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens SS (1971) Sensory power functions and neural events. In: Lowenstein WR (ed) Handbook of sensory physiology, Vol 1. Springer, Berlin, pp 226–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Timm NH, Carlson JE (1976) Part and bipartial canonical correlation analysis. Psychometrika 41: 159–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Vallbo ÅB, Olsson KÅ, Westberg KG, Clark FJ (1984) Microstimulation of single tactile afferents from the human hand. Sensory attributes related to unit type and properties of receptive fields. Brain 104: 727–749

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner G, Mountcastle VB (1965) Neuronal activity in mechanoreceptive cutaneous afferents: stimulus-response relations, Weber functions, and information transmission. J Neurophysiol 28: 359–397

    Google Scholar 

  • Westling G, Johansson R, Vallbo ÅB (1976) A method for mechanical stimulation of skin receptors. In: Zotterman Y (ed) Sensory function of the skin in primates. Pergamon, Oxford, pp 151–158

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hashimoto, I., Yoshikawa, K. & Sasaki, M. Somatosensory evoked potential correlates of psychophysical magnitude estimations for tactile air-puff stimulation in man. Exp Brain Res 73, 459–469 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00406602

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00406602

Key words

Navigation