Skip to main content
Log in

Testing values of crested porcupine habitats by experimental food patches

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

We established depletable, artificial food patches in three habitats used by Indian crested porcupines (Hystrix indica) in a desert biome, and measured the number of food items remaining (i.e., “giving up density”=GUD) following nightly foraging bouts. Porcupines discriminated between resource types (peanuts vs. garbanzo beans), and exhibited clear habitat preferences in the face of uniform resource availability in time and space. Lowest GUD's (=lowest foraging costs) were in the habitat of densest cover, and during dark (little or no moon) nights. The results indicated a high sensitivity to predation risk. Crested porcupines behaved as expected of optimal foragers, and appear to be excellent subjects for further field experiments using the GUD approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alkon PU, Olsvig-Whittaker L (1989) Crested porcupine digs in Negev habitats: patterns of density, size, and longevity. J Arid Environ 17: 255–266

    Google Scholar 

  • Alkon PU, Saltz D (1985) Potatoes and the nutritional ecology of crested porcupines (Hystrix indica) in a desert biome. J Appl Ecol 22: 727–737

    Google Scholar 

  • Alkon PU, Saltz D (1988) Influence of season and moonlight on temporal-activity patterns of Indian crested porcupines (Hystrix indica). J Mammal 69: 71–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Alkon PU, Degen AA, Cohen A, Pollack H (1986) Seasonal energy requirements and water intakes of Indian crested porcupines (Hystrix indica) in captivity. J Mammal 67: 333–342

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair WF (1943) Activities of the Chihuahua deer-mouse in relation to light intensity. J Wild Mgmt 7: 92–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown JS (1988) Patch use as an indicator of habitat preference, predation risk and competition. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 23: 27–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown JS (1989) Desert rodent community structure: A test of four mechanisms of coexistence. Ecol Monogr 59: 1–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown JS, Mitchell WA (1989) Diet selection on depletable resources. Oikos 54: 33–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown JS, Kotler BP, Smith RJ, Wirtz WO II (1988) The effects of owl predation on the foraging behavior of heteromyid rodents. Oecologia 76: 408–415

    Google Scholar 

  • Brownlee KA (1965) Statistical Theory and Methodology in Science and Engineering, 2nd Edition. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Butynski TM (1984) Nocturnal ecology of the spring hare, Pedetes capensis, in Botswana. Afr J Ecol 22: 7–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Caraco T (1979) Time budgeting and group size: a theory. Ecology 60: 611–617

    Google Scholar 

  • Hay ME, Renaud PE, Fenical W (1988) Large mobile versus small sedentary herbivores and their resistance to seaweed chemical defenses. Oecologia 75: 246–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodges CM, Wolf LL (1981) Optimal foraging in bumblebees: Why is nectar left behind in flowers? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 9: 41–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotler BP (1984a) Risk of predation and the structure of desert rodent communities. Ecology 65: 689–701

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotler BP (1984b) Harvesting rates and predatory risk in desert rodents: a comparison of two communities on different continents. J Mammal 65: 91–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotler BP, Brown JS, Smith RJ, Wirtz WO II (1988) The effects of morphology and body size on rates of owl predation on desert rodents. Oikos 53: 145–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Lima SL, Valone TJ, Caraco T (1985) Foraging efficiency-predation risk tradeoff in the gray squirrel. Anim Behav 33: 155–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockard RB, Owings DH (1974a) Moon-related surface activity of bannertali (Dipodomys spectabilis) and Fresno (D. nitratoides) kangaroo rats. Anim Behav 22: 262–273

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockard RB, Owings DH (1974b) Seasonal variation in moonlight avoidance by bannertail kangaroo rats. J Mammal 55: 189–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimm SL, Rosenzweig ML, Mitchell W (1985) Competition and food selection: field tests of a theory. Ecology 66: 798–807

    Google Scholar 

  • Price MV, Waser NW, Bass TA (1984) Effects of moonlight on microhabitat use by desert rodents. J Mammal 65: 353–356

    Google Scholar 

  • Saltz D, Alkon PU (1989) On the spatial behaviour of Indian crested porcupines. J Zool Lond 217: 255–266

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1981) Biometry, 2nd Edition. WH Freeman, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg PD (1988) Effects of quantitative and qualitative variation in phenolic compounds on feeding in three species of marine invertebrate herbivores. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 120: 221–237

    Google Scholar 

  • Valone TJ, Brown JS (1989) Measuring patch assessment abilities of desert granivores. Ecology 70: 1800–1810

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner EE, Gilliam JF, Hall DJ, Mittlebach GG (1983) An experimental test of the effects of predation risk on habitat use in fish. Ecology 64: 1540–1548

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson DS (1976) Deducing the energy available in the environment: an application of optimal foraging theory. Biotropica 8: 96–103

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brown, J.S., Alkon, P.U. Testing values of crested porcupine habitats by experimental food patches. Oecologia 83, 512–518 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00317202

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00317202

Key words

Navigation