Abstract
This chapter introduces the field of biomedical informatics, explaining that it addresses underlying scientific issues (basic research) while also having major applied goals and an opportunity to transform life science research, health, and health care in positive ways. It acknowledges that the full potential of the field has not yet been realized and points to some issues that remain for the discipline to address in the future. It also emphasizes the interplay between informatics and a wide variety of economic and social issues that characterize modern health care.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The Institute of Medicine, part of the National Academy of Sciences, is now known as the National Academy of Medicine.
- 2.
- 3.
This section is adapted from a discussion that originally appeared in (Shortliffe and Sondik 2004).
- 4.
- 5.
7 https://nam.edu/programs/value-science-driven-health-care/learning-health-system-series/ (Accessed 05/29/19)
- 6.
7 https://medicine.umich.edu/dept/learning-health-sciences (Accessed 05/03/2020)
- 7.
7 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/23796146 (Accessed 05/03/2020)
- 8.
7 https://www.hcinnovationgroup.com/policy-value-based-care/staffing-professional-development/news/13024360/report-health-informatics-labor-market-lags-behind-demand-for-workers (Accessed 5/30/2019); 7 https://www.bestvalueschools.com/faq/job-outlook-health-informatics-graduates/ (Accessed 5/30/2019).
- 9.
7 https://www.burning-glass.com/wp-content/uploads/BG-Health_Informatics_2014.pdf (Accessed 5/30/2019).
- 10.
A directory of some existing training programs is available at 7 http://www.amia.org/education/programs-and-courses (Accessed 5/30/19).
- 11.
7 https://www.ornl.gov/sci/techresources/Human_Genome/home.shtml (Accessed 5/31/2019).
- 12.
Available at 7 https://acd.od.nih.gov/documents/reports/060399_Biomed_Computing_WG_RPT.htm (Accessed 5/31/2019).
- 13.
See 7 http://www.bisti.nih.gov/. (Accessed 5/31/2019).
- 14.
7 http://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-biomedical-informatics (Accessed 5/30/19).
- 15.
7 https://www.amia.org/about-amia/science-informatics (Accessed 5//27/19).
- 16.
The latter system was later taken over and further developed by the Technicon Corporation (subsequently TDS Healthcare Systems Corporation). Later the system was part of the suite of products available from Eclipsys, Inc. (which in turn was acquired by Allscripts, Inc in 2010).
- 17.
- 18.
Clinical informatics was approved in 2013 by the American Board of Medical Specialties as a formal subspecialty of medicine (Finnell and Dixon, 2015), with board certification examinations offered for eligible candidates by the American Board of Preventive Medicine (7 https://www.theabpm.org/become-certified/subspecialties/clinical-informatics/ (Accessed 6/1/19)). AMIA is formulating a similar certification program, AMIA Health Informatics Certification (AHIC) for non-physicians who are working in the clinical informatics area (7 https://www.amia.org/ahic, Accessed 1/5/2020).
- 19.
7 https://www.amia.org/COVID19 (Accessed 05/03/2020)
- 20.
See also the diagram in (Kulikowski et al. 2012), which shows how these two disciplines span all areas of applied biomedical informatics.
- 21.
7 https://ncats.nih.gov/ctsa (Accessed 6/2/2019).
- 22.
7 https://www.amia.org/meetings-and-events (Accessed 6/2/2019)
- 23.
Many current biomedical informatics training programs were designed with this perspective in mind. Students with interests in clinical, imaging, public health, and biologic applications are often trained together and are required to learn something about each of the other application areas, even while specializing in one subarea for their own research. Several such programs were described in a series of articles in the Journal of Biomedical Informatics in 2007 (Tarczy-Hornoch et al. 2007) and many more have been added since that time.
- 24.
Many interesting problems cannot be computed in a reasonable time and require heuristics. Computability theory is the foundation for assessing the feasibility and cost of computation to provide the complete and correct results to a formally stated problem.
- 25.
In fact, the multidisciplinary nature of biomedical informatics has led the informatics term to be borrowed in other disciplines, including computer science organizations, even though the English name for the field was first adopted in the biomedical context. Today we even have generic full departments of informatics in the US (e.g., see 7 https://informatics.njit.edu, Accessed 11/28/2020) and in other parts of the world as well (e.g., 7 http://www.sussex.ac.uk/informatics/. Accessed 1/5/2020). In the US, there are full schools with informatics in their title (e.g., 7 https://luddy.indiana.edu/index.html. Accessed 1/5/2020) and even a School of Biomedical Informatics (7 https://sbmi.uth.edu/. Accessed 1/2/2020).
- 26.
By the late 1960s the first BME departments were formed in the US at the University of Virginia, Case Western Reserve University, Johns Hopkins University, and Duke University (see 7 https://navigate.aimbe.org/why-bioengineering/history/, Accessed 6/2/2019). Duke’s undergraduate degree program in BMI was the first to be accredited by the Engineering Council for Professional Development (September 1972).
- 27.
Technological progress in this area is occurring at a dizzying rate. Consider, for example, the announcement that scientists are advancing the notion of using DNA for data storage and can store as much as 704 terabytes of information in a gram of DNA. 7 http://www.engadget.com/2012/08/19/harvard-stores-704tb-in-a-gram-of-dna; 7 https://homes.cs.washington.edu/~bornholt/dnastorage-asplos16/ (Accessed 5/30/19).
- 28.
The Institute of Medicine (IOM), part of the former National Academy of Sciences (NAS) was reorganized in 2015 to become the National Academy of Medicine (NAM). The NAS is now known as the National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM).
References
Balas, E. A., & Boren, S. A. (2000). Managing clinical knowledge for health care improvement. In Yearbook of medical informatics 2000: Patient-centered systems (pp. 65–70). Stuttgart: Schattauer.
Begun, J. W., Zimmerman, B., & Dooley, K. (2003). Health care organizations as complex adaptive systems. In S. M. Mick & M. Wyttenbach (Eds.), Advances in health care organization theory (pp. 253–288). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Blois, M. S. (1984). Information and medicine: The nature of medical descriptions. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Bowie, J., & Barnett, G. O. (1976). MUMPS: An economical and efficient time-sharing system for information management. Computer Programs in Biomedicine, 6, 11–22.
Collen, M. F. (1995). A history of medical informatics in the United States, 1950 to 1990. Bethesda: American Medical Informatics Association.
Daley, K. A. (2013). A continuously learning health care system in the United States. In NAM perspectives. Washington, DC: Commentary, National Academy of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.31478/201307b.
Dick, R., & Steen, E. (Eds.). (1991). The computer – Based patient record : An essential technology for HealthCare. (Rev. 1997). Washington, D.C.: Institute of Medicine, National Academy Press.
Elstein, K. A., Shulman, L. S., & Sprafka, S. A. (1978a). Medical problem solving: An analysis of clinical reasoning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Finnell, J. T., & Dixon, B. E. (2015). Clinical informatics study guide: Text and review. London: Springer.
Greenes, R. A., & Shortliffe, E. H. (1990). Medical informatics: An emerging academic discipline and institutional priority. Journal of the American Medical Association, 263(8), 1114–1120.
Greenes, R. A., Barnett, G. O., Klein, S. W., Robbins, A., & Prior, R. E. (1970). Recording, retrieval, and review of medical data by physician-computer interaction. The New England Journal of Medicine, 282(6), 307–315.
James, G., Witten, D., Hastie, T., & Tibshirani, R. (2013). An introduction to statistical learning: With applications in R, (Springer texts in statistics). New York: Springer.
Krumholz, H. M., Radford, M. J., Wang, Y., Chen, J., Heiat, A. & Marciniak, T. A. (1998). National use and effectiveness of beta-blockers for the treatment of elderly patients after acute myocardial infarction: National Cooperative Cardiovascular Project. JAMA, 19; 280(7), 623–9.
Kulikowski, C. A., Shortliffe, E. H., et al. (2012). AMIA Board white paper: Definition of biomedical informatics and specification of core competencies for graduate education in the discipline. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 19(6), 931–938.
Ozkaynak, M., Brennan, P. F., Hanauer, D. A., Johnson, S., Aarts, J., Zheng, K., & Haque, S. N. (2013). Patient-centered care requires a patient oriented workflow model. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association: JAMIA, 20(e1), e14–e16.
Patel, V. L., & Groen, G. J. (1986). Knowledge based solution strategies in medical reasoning. Cognitive Science, 10(1), 91–116.
Reeves, J. J., Hollandsworth, H. M., Torriani, F. J., et al. (2020). Rapid response to COVID-19: Health informatics support for outbreak management in an academic health system. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association: JAMIA, ocaa037. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocaa037.
Schwartz, W. B. (1970). Medicine and the computer: The promise and problems of change. The New England Journal of Medicine, 283(23), 1257–1264.
Shortliffe, E. H. (1993a). Doctors, patients, and computers: Will information technology dehumanize health-care delivery? Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 137(3), 390–398.
Shortliffe, E. H. (1998a). The next generation internet and health care: A civics lesson for the informatics community. In Proceedings of the AMIA annual fall symposium (pp. 8–14). Orlando.
Shortliffe, E. H. (1998b). The evolution of health-care records in the era of the internet, proceedings of Medinfo 98. Seoul/Amsterdam: IOS Press.
Shortliffe, E. H. (2000). Networking health: Learning from others, taking the lead. Health Affairs, 19(6), 9–22.
Shortliffe, E. H. (2005). Strategic action in health information technology: Why the obvious has taken so long. Health Affairs, 24, 1222–1233.
Shortliffe, E. H. (2010). Biomedical informatics in the education of physicians. Journal of the American Medical Association, 304(11), 1227–1228.
Shortliffe, E. H., & Sondik, E. (2004). The informatics infrastructure: Anticipating its role in cancer surveillance. Proceedings of the C-change summit on cancer surveillance and information: The next decade, Phoenix, AZ.
Simborg, D. W., Chadwick, M., Whiting-O’Keefe, Q. E., Tolchin, S. G., Kahn, S. A., & Bergan, E. S. (1983). Local area networks and the hospital. Computers and Biomedical Research, 16(3), 247–259.
Tarczy-Hornoch, P., Markey, M. K., Smith, J. A., & Hiruki, T. (2007). Biomedical informatics and genomic medicine: Research and training. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 40, 1–4.
Yasnoff, W. A., Sweeney, L., & Shortliffe, E. H. (2013). Putting health IT on the path to success. Journal of the American Medical Association, 309(10), 989–990.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Shortliffe, E.H., Chiang, M.F. (2021). Biomedical Informatics: The Science and the Pragmatics. In: Shortliffe, E.H., Cimino, J.J. (eds) Biomedical Informatics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58721-5_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58721-5_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-58720-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-58721-5
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)