Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comparison of two electromyographical endotracheal tube systems for intraoperative recurrent laryngeal nerve monitoring: reliability and side effects

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) monitoring systems should be reliable and safe. Monitoring via electromyographical systems on an endotracheal tube (ETT) is widely spread. The MagStim™ system consists of an adhesive electrode to be fixed on an endotracheal tube. The Xomed™ endotracheal tube provides integrated electrodes. Reliability and side effects had never been compared. As both systems have very different morphological properties, we hypothesized that there might be differences in reliability and the incidence of side effects.

Methods

In a retrospective quality management analysis of 118 patients (MagStim™ electrode, 57 patients; Xomed™ ETT, 61 patients), we compared laryngeal side effects according to the Chilla score and detection rate of the RLN.

Results

Both systems had comparable detection rates of the RLN above 95%. Both electrode systems seemed to have similar reliability. Difficulties to detect the nerve were observed in seven patients (four with MagStim, three with Xomed). In the group with the Xomed™ ETT, significantly less mild laryngeal side effects were observed.

Conclusion

Both MagStim™ and Xomed™ ETT were reliable in detecting the RLN. The Xomed™ ETT, however, might cause milder laryngeal side effects compared with the MagStim™ electrode.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bouaggad A, Nejmi SE, Bouderka MA et al (2004) Prediction of difficult tracheal intubation in thyroid surgery. Anesth Analg 99:603–606 (table of contents)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chiang FY, Lee KW, Chen HC et al (2010) Standardization of intraoperative neuromonitoring of recurrent laryngeal nerve in thyroid operation. World J Surg 34:223–229

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Chilla R, Gabriel P, Ilse H (1976) The short-time-intubation as a cause of morphological and functional disorders of the larynx (author’s translation). Laryngol Rhinol Otol 55:118–123

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Connolly TM, Watters DA (2010) Monitoring performance in thyroidectomy: cumulative sum analysis of outcomes. Thyroid 20:407–412

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dralle H (2006) Impact of modern technologies on quality of thyroid surgery. Langenbeck’s Archives of Surgery/Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Chirurgie 391:1–3

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Dralle H, Sekulla C, Haerting J et al (2004) Risk factors of paralysis and functional outcome after recurrent laryngeal nerve monitoring in thyroid surgery. Surgery 136:1310–1322

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fruhwald H, Schmiedl R (1980) [Cuff damage of the tracheal mucosa in intubation. Experimental examinations of the trachea of the human corpse (author’s translation)]. Laryngol Rhinol Otol 59:737–742

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gabriel P, Chilla R (1978) [Dysphonia following strumectomy. Laryngeal and vocal cord changes as sequelae of thyroid surgery]. Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der Operativen Medizen 49:576–579

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hemmerling TM, Schmidt J, Wolf T et al (2000) Surface vs intramuscular laryngeal electromyography. Can J Anaesth 47:860–865

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hemmerling TM, Schurr C, Dern S et al (2000) Intraoperative electromyographic recurrent laryngeal nerve identification as a routine measure. Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen 71:545–550

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hemmerling TM, Schmidt J, Bosert C et al (2001) Intraoperative monitoring of the recurrent laryngeal nerve in 151 consecutive patients undergoing thyroid surgery. Anesthesia and Analgesia 93:396–399 (393rd contents page)

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Khan A, Pearlman RC, Bianchi DA et al (1997) Experience with two types of electromyography monitoring electrodes during thyroid surgery. Am J Otolaryngol 18:99–102

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Grunebaum LD, Rosen D, Krein HD et al (2005) Nerve monitoring and stimulation during endoscopic neck surgery in the pig. Laryngoscope 115:712–716

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mencke T, Echternach M, Kleinschmidt S et al (2003) Laryngeal morbidity and quality of tracheal intubation: a randomized controlled trial. Anesthesiology 98:1049–1056

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Proschel U, Eysholdt U (1993) Short-term changes in the larynx and voice after intubation. Laryngorhinootologie 72:93–97

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Pearlman RC, Isley MR, Ruben GD et al (2005) Intraoperative monitoring of the recurrent laryngeal nerve using acoustic, free-run, and evoked electromyography. J Clin Neurophysiol 22:148–152

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Anaesthesiology, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Krankenhausstr 12, 91054, Erlangen, Germany

    Torsten Birkholz, Christina Saalfrank-Schardt, Andrea Irouschek, Sven Albrecht & Joachim Schmidt

  2. Department of Surgery, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany

    Peter Klein

Authors
  1. Torsten Birkholz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Christina Saalfrank-Schardt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Andrea Irouschek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Peter Klein
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Sven Albrecht
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Joachim Schmidt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Torsten Birkholz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Birkholz, T., Saalfrank-Schardt, C., Irouschek, A. et al. Comparison of two electromyographical endotracheal tube systems for intraoperative recurrent laryngeal nerve monitoring: reliability and side effects. Langenbecks Arch Surg 396, 1173–1179 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-011-0819-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-011-0819-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation